Ufa Archaeological Herald

This research enhances the academic discourse with chemical composition data of non-ferrous metal artefacts from the Pyany Bor culture, specifically trilobate bronze arrowheads. The objective of the study is to verify and refine the previously proposed thesis regarding the predominance of pure copper in these weapons. The paper presents elemental composition of 167 samples from ten Pyany Bor culture burial mounds located in the Republic of Bashkortostan. The artefacts were examined with X-ray fluorescence analysis on an expanded source base which ensures a high representativeness of the sample. The results show that over 94 % of the artefacts were manufactured from pure copper (97–100 % Cu). This fact confirms the hypothesis that it was reasonable to use readily available metal for single-use items that do not require special casting properties. Cases of intentional alloying are rare (less than 6 %): there are five samples of leaded bronze, one sample of lead-tin bronze, and two samples of arsenical bronze, which suggests occasional use of scrap metal or imported raw materials. A comparative analysis with 32 samples from the Bishungarovo burial mound of the Early Sarmatian culture reveals a fundamentally different metallurgical tradition, where nearly half of the arrowheads (about 46 %) are made of high-arsenical bronzes (13-22 % As) indicating active and deliberate alloying. The comparison makes it possible to contrast the process strategies of two different ethnocultural population groups - the sedentary forest-steppe population (Pyany Bor culture) and the nomadic population (Early Sarmatian culture). It is evident that each community has their own set of economic and cultural characteristics. The identified differences are probably conditioned not by technological backwardness, but rather by a conscious cultural choice, raw material base, and established traditions of metalworking inherited from previous eras. The obtained findings make a significant contribution to the study of the technological aspects of weapon production in the Volga-Ural region during the Early Iron Age.

Volga-Ural region, Early Iron Age, Pyany Bor culture, arrowheads, X-ray fluorescence analysis, pure copper, leaded bronze, arsenic bronze, Early Sarmatian culture

• Blinov, I.A., Tairov, A.D., 2022, “Сhemical composition of metal in copper and bronze arrowheads from the Kichigino I burial ground”, The Lower Volga archaeological bulletin, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 91–118. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15688/nav.jvolsu.2022.1.5
• Gening, V.F., 1970, History of the population of the Udmurt Prikamye in the Pianoborsky era. Ch. 1: Cheganda Culture (III century BC – II century AD). UrGU, Sverdlovsk, 224 p. (Questions of Archeology of the Urals, no. 10) (In Russ.)
• Goldina, R.D., Perevoshchikov, S.E., 2017. “Bladed weapons of the 1st–5th centuries from Tarasovo burial site in the Middle Kama region”, Ural Historical Journal, no. 1 (54), pp. 113–123. (In Russ.)
• Goldina, R.D., Perevoshchikov, S.E., Sabirova, T.M., 2012, “On the composition of the metal of some ornaments from the Nyrgynda I burial ground of the 1st–3rd centuries AD in the Middle Kama region”, Nyrgynda I burial ground of the 2nd – 3rd centuries on the middle Kama, Udmurtskij universitet, Izhevsk, pp. 341–349. (Proceedings and research of the Kama-Vyatka archaeological expedition, vol. 22) (In Russ.)
• Zhuravleva, G.N., 2014, “Preliminary results of the Nyrgyndinsky II cemetery researches according to Gening’s excavations”, The Volga River Region Archaeology, no. 1 (7), pp. 69–91. (In Russ.)
• Zubov, S.E., 2009, “Pianobor culture”, History of the Bashkir people: in 7 vols., vol. I, Nauka, Moscow, pp. 255–267. (In Russ.)
• Zubov, S.E., Sattarov, R.R., 2014, “Sarmatian imports and influence on the weapons of tribes of Pyanoborskaya culture of the Ick and Belaya interfluve”, Izvestiya of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 314–320. (In Russ.)
• Zubov, S.E., Sattarov, R.R., 2018. “Arrowheads of the Pianoborsk culture as chronological markers (based on burial materials from the Kipchakovsky I burial mound-ground cemetery)”, XXI Ural archaeological meeting dedicated to the 85th anniversary of G.I. Matveeva and the 70th anniversary of I.B. Vasiliev. Proceedings of the All-Russian scientific conference with international participation, SGSPU, Samara, pp. 210–214. (In Russ.)
• Ivanov, V.A., 1984, Weapons and military affairs of the Finno-Ugrians of the Urals in the Early Iron Age (1st millennium BC – first half of the 1st millennium AD). Nauka, Moscow, 88 p. (In Russ.)
• Kazantseva, O.A., Perevoshchikov, S.E., Sabirova, T.M., 2015, “Composition of objects from non-ferrous metals from Krasnoyarsky I burial ground”, Proceedings of the Komi Science Center Ural Branch Russian Academy of Sciences, iss. 4 (24), pp. 100–107. (In Russ.)
• Kondrashin, V.V., 2008, “Results of metallographic analysis of blacksmithing equipment from the Kipchak burial ground”, Actual Archaeological Problems of Ural and Volga Regions, SOIKM P.V. Alabin, SamGU, Samara, pp. 271–276. (In Russ.).
• Kondrashin, V.V., Perevoshchikov, S.E., 2012, “Materials on ironworking of the Pyanobor culture”, Voyager: World and Man, no. 3, pp. 240–246.
• Krasnoperov, A.A., 2006, Costume of the population of the Chegandin culture in the Kama region: 2nd century BC – 5th century AD. Dissertation … Candidate of Historical Science. Izhevsk, 273 p. (In Russ.)
• Kuzminykh, S.V., 1983, Metallurgy of the Volga-Kama region in the early Iron Age (copper and bronze), Nauka, Moscow, 257 p. (In Russ.)
• Orekhov, P.M., 2006, Bronze Casting in the Kama Region during the Post-Ananyino Period. Dissertation abstract … Candidate of Historical Science. Izhevsk, 24 p. (In Russ.)
• Perevoshchikov, S.E., Sabirova, T.M., 2014, “Non-ferrous metal from the Oshkin burial ground of the late 1st – 3rd centuries based on X-ray fluorescence analysis”, The Vyatka region in the Pyanobor era (based on materials from burial sites of the 1st – 5th centuries AD), adj. II, UdmGU, Izhevsk, pp. 452–470. (Materials and research of the Kama-Vyatka archaeological expedition, vol. 27) (In Russ.)
• Prokopyeva, T.Yu., Chernykh, E.M., 2025, “The chemical composition of the metal ornaments of the Boyarsky (“Aray”) burial ground (adj. 2)”, Chernykh E.M., Khairullina O.F. The Boyar burial ground “Arai” of the Mazunin type in the Udmurt Kama region, Udmurtskij universitet, Izhevsk, pp. 357–370. (Materials and research of the Kamsko-Vyatka archaeological expedition, vol. 34) (In Russ.)
• Sabirova, T.M., 2019, “Composition of metal fibulae from the Middle Kama region (based on the materials of the Udmurt State University collection)”, The Volga River Region Archaeology, no. 1 (27), pp. 180–193. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24852/2019.1.27.180.193
• Sattarov, R.R., Dotkin, K.V., 2020, “Archaeological Objects from Non-Ferrous Metals and Alloys from Kipchakovo II Burial Ground of the Piany Bor Culture”, Archaeology of the Eurasian Steppes, no. 5, pp. 119–129. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24852/2587-6112.2020.5.119.129