ISSN: 1814-1692 eISSN: 2782-2842 DOI: 10.31833/UAV

The phenomenon of big burial mounds of the Yamnaya culture in the Volga-Ural interfluve region

Year: 2026

Pages: 275–292

UDC: 903.5 (1-924.85/.86)"6373"

Number: Volume 26, issue 2

Type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi. org/10.31833/uav/2026.26.2.016

Topic: Latitudinal and Longitudinal Relations

Authors: Fayzullin Airat A., Sverchkova Alena E.

Summary:

All the large burial mounds of the Yamnaya culture from the Volga-Ural region that have been studied to date are analyzed. The burial mounds under study were located in the floodplain zone and on the first above-floodplain terraces of the Ural and Samara rivers and their tributaries, which is related to the location of summer pastures and the rich forage resources in the wide floodplains of these rivers and on the nearby watersheds. Based on stratigraphic and paleosoil science data, the main architectural elements and construction techniques of the monumental complexes of the Yamnaya culture in the Volga-Ural region have been traced. The main feature of the monumental complexes of the Yamnaya culture is their large size. The structure itself is homogeneous and was built, if not in one step, then in a short period of time, over a single central burial of a leader. There are no late additions or inhumations from the Early and Middle Bronze Ages in the burial mounds. Most of the burial mounds had rounded, enclosed circular ditches that were clearly visible in the landscape. These findings suggest that the burial mounds were architectural structures built by the Yamnaya culture using specific technologies, techniques, and ready-made building materials. This architectural design suggests that the burial mounds were not just places of burial for leaders, but also served as centers for religious gatherings, with the practical purpose of uniting pastoralist communities and marking favorable pasturelands for seasonal migrations. The origins and concept of monumental burial mound architecture in the Early Bronze Age are likely to be associated with the Maykop and later Usatovo cultures. The emergence of such structures in the Yamnaya culture is directly linked to the socio-economic and religious processes that took place in the Yamnaya culture society during the 3rd millennium BCE. These structures were a reflection of the progress in religious beliefs, which were embodied in the lavish funeral processions of leaders. The labor involved and the symbolism of the artifacts in the leaders' burials suggest that the Yamnaya culture population was at a pre-polity stage of social development, where the symbolism of labor held great significance for the highest prestige of the leader.

Keywords:

archeology, early Bronze Age, yamnaya culture, kurgan, social organization

References:

  • Bogdanov, S.V., 1998, “Bolshoy Dedurovsky Mar”, Archaeological Monuments of the Orenburg Region, iss. 2, Dimur, Orenburg, pp. 17–37. (In Russ.)
  • Bogdanov, S.V., 2000, “The ancient Yamnaya culture necropolis near Grachevka”, Archaeological Monuments of the Orenburg Region, iss. IV, Orenburgskaya guberniya, Orenburg, pp. 11–27. (In Russ.)
  • Bogdanov, S.V., 2004, The Copper Age of the Steppe Urals. Uro RAN, Ekaterinburg, 283 p. (In Russ.)
  • Vasilyev, I.B., 1980, “The Yamno-Poltavka Burial Ground near the Village of Utevka in the Middle Volga Region”, Archaeology of the Eastern European Forest-Steppe, VGPI, Voronezh, pp. 32–59. (In Russ.)
  • Vasilyev, I.B., 2015, “The Yamno-Poltavka Graveyard near the Village of Utevka in the Middle Volga Region”, Issues of Archaeology of the Volga Region, iss. 5, SamNC RAN, Samara, pp. 4–49. (In Russ.)
  • Vasilyev, I.B., Kuznetsov, P.F., 1988, “Poltavkinskiye burial grounds near the village of Krasnosamarskoye in the forest-steppe Zavolzhye”, Research of archaeological monuments of Eastern Europe, VGPI, Voronezh, pp. 39–59. (In Russ.)
  • Korenevsky, S.N., 2010, “The phenomenon of big Maikop kurgans – labour and cult aspects of construction”, KSIA, iss. 224, pp. 149–170. (In Russ.)
  • Korenevsky, S.N., 2011, “Power as a phenomenon in early agricultural and stockbreeding societies (Ethnological theory and archaeology)”, KSIA, vol. 225, pp. 175–189. (In Russ.)
  • Mimohod, R.A., 2009, Kurgans of the Bronze Age and the Early Iron Age in the Saratov Volga Region: Characteristics and Cultural and Chronological Attribution of Complexes:. Taus, Moscow, 292 p. (In Russ.)
  • Morgunova, N.L., 2000, “Bolshoy Boldyrevsky Mound”, Archaeological Monuments of the Orenburg Region, iss. 4, OGPU, Orenburg, pp. 55–62. (In Russ.)
  • Morgunova, N.L., Golieva, A.A., Kraeva, L.A., Meshcheryakov, D.V., Turetsky, M.A., Khalyapin, M.V., Khokhlova, O.S., 2003, Shumaevsky Mounds. OGPU, Orenburg, 392 p. (In Russ.)
  • Morgunova, N.L., 2014, The Ural Group of Monuments in the Volga-Ural Variant of the Yamnaya Cultural and Historical Region. OGPU, Orenburg, 348 p. (In Russ.)
  • Morgunova, N.L., Fayzullin, A.A., 2023, “Manufacturing Symbolism of Macrolytic Stone Tools in the Yamnaya Culture Funeral Rite of Southern Urals and Middle Volga Region”, The Lower Volga Archaeological Bulletin, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 25–37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15688/nav.jvolsu.2023.2.2
  • Morgunova, N.L., Fayzullin, A.A., 2018, “The Social Structure of the Yamnaуa (Pit-Grave) Culture of the Volga-Ural Interfluve”, Stratum plus, no. 2, pp. 35–60. (In Russ.)
  • Morgunova, N.L., Fayzullin, A.A., 2024, “Chronology of an Elite Mound of the Yamnaya Culture Boldyrevo IV Burial Ground in the Orenburg Region According to Stratigraphy, Burial Rite and Radiocarbon Dating”, The Volga River Region Archaeology, no. 1 (47), pp. 69–86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24852/pa2024.1.47.69.85
  • Piotrovsky, Yu.Yu., 2020, “The Maikop kurgan (OSHAD): a modern view”, Camera Praehistorica, no. 1, pp. 61–75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31250/2658-3828-2020-1-61-75
  • Semenov, Yu.I., 1993, Economic Ethnology. Primitive and early pre-class society. Book 1. Part 3. IEIA, Moscow, 710 p. (In Russ.)
  • Fayzullin, A.A., 2024, “On the need to study ditches in the barrows of the Yamnaya culture”, Traces of changes and processes in archaeological objects: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, Pechatny Dvor, Stavropol, pp. 224–232. (In Russ.)
  • Khokhlova, O.S., Sverchkova, A.E., Morgunova, N.L., Fayzullin, A.A., Myakshina, T.N., 2023, “Basic techniques of mound construction of the Yamnaya culture in the Southern Urals”, The Journal of Soils and Environment, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1–20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31251/pos.v6i2.213
  • Khokhlova, O.S., Sverchkova, A.E., Myakshina, T.N., 2025, “Earthen constructions of the Yamnaya culture kurgans in the Orenburg region: a case study of applying soil science approaches to archaeological challenges”, Lomonosov soil science journal. Series 17, Soil Science, no. 4, pp. 61–79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0137-0944-17-2025-80-4-61-79
  • Chechenov, I.M., 1984, “The Second Mound Groups near the Villages of Kishpek and Chegem II”, Archaeological Research at the New Construction Sites of Kabardino-Balkaria in 1972–1979, vol. 1, Elbrus, Nalchik, pp. 164–253. (In Russ.)
  • Chechenov, I.M., 1973, Nalchik buried tomb. Elbrus, Nalchik, 68 p.
  • Yarovoy, E.V., 1990, The Chalcolithic and Bronze Age Burial Mounds of the Lower Transnistria. Ştiinţa, Kishinev, 272 p. (In Russ.)
  • Khokhlova, O., Sverchkova, A., Myakshina, T., Kalmykov, A.A., 2022, “Geoarchaeological study of the large early Bronze Age Essentuksky 1 kurgan in Ciscaucasia, Russia”, Geoarchaeology, vol. 37, pp. 400–417. https://doi.org/10.1002/gea.21897
Download pdf
up
Search
ISSN: 1814-1692 eISSN: 2782-2842 DOI: 10.31833/UAV