ISSN: 1814-1692 eISSN: 2782-2842 DOI: 10.31833/UAV

Attributing Hand-Made Ceramic Vessels to a “Single Potter”: Method and Preliminary Findings

Year: 2026

Pages: 446–464

UDC: 903.023

Number: Volume 26, issue 2

Type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31833/uav/2026.26.2.024

Topic: Integrated Researches: Metallurgy, Livestock Keeping, Ceramics

Authors: Sukhanov Evgeny V., Klimova Anna D.

Summary:

Study of ancient ceramics most often begins with their systematization. This usually involves creating a typology or classification. When doing this, researchers must decide an appropriate level of detail for distinguishing form-types, yet archaeological guidance for making that choice remains limited. One promising way to address this problem is to search for criteria that allow identification of vessels produced by a “single potter”. Here the term denotes pottery whose variation does not exceed the range of random fluctuation expected from items made by the same person. This study aims to develop and test quantitative criteria for identifying single-maker products on the basis of the shapes of hand-made pottery, which forms a numerous part of ceramic assemblages across many archaeological contexts. To this end, we have analyzed roughly 40 experimental series of hand-made vessels produced by individual makers, covering several vessel categories (jugs, pots, jars and bowls). We derived and validated minimum pairwise similarity thresholds for vessel shape that, on the experimental material, allow items made by the same hand to be identified with high accuracy. Application of the method to archaeological ceramics (Srubnaya and Alakul cultures from the Southern Urals; Roman-period vessels from South-Western Crimea) demonstrates the ability to reveal series of vessels and associated assemblages that are internally coherent in cultural or chronological terms. The procedures presented here should therefore be of interest to researchers working on ancient ceramics, and may prove especially useful where historical and archaeological context is incomplete or where the conventional data used for interpreting typologies and classifications are poor.

Keywords:

vessel shapes, pairwise comparison, vessels of a “single potter”, Southern Urals, South-Western Crimea

References:

  • Bobrinsky, A.A., 1978, Pottery of Eastern Europe. Sources and methods of study. Nauka, Moscow, 272 p. (In Russ.)
  • Volkova, E.V., 1998, Ceramics of the Volosovo-Danilovsky burial ground of the Fatyanovo culture as a historical source. Staryj sad, Moscow, 260 p. (In Russ.)
  • Volkova, E.V., 2021, "«One craftsman’s» vessels from the ceramic assemblage of the Balanovo cemetery", KSIA, iss. 264, pp. 388–406. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.25681/IARAS.0130-2620.264.388-406
  • Epimakhov, A.V., 2023, "Alakul culture chronology (new materials for discussion)", KSIA, iss. 270, pp. 171–186. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.25681/IARAS.0130-2620.270.171-186
  • Ismagil, R., Morozov, Yu.A., Chaplygin, M.S., 2009, Nikolaevsky mounds ("Elena") on the Sterlya River in Bashkortostan. DesignPolygraphService, Ufa, 240 p. (In Russ.)
  • Klein, L.S., 1991, Archaeological typology. LF CENDISI, LNIAO, Leningrad, 447 p. (In Russ.)
  • Morgunova, N.L., Golyeva, A.A., Degtyareva, A.D., Evgeniev, A.A., Kuptsova, L.V., Salugina, N.P., Khokhlova, O.S., Khokhlov, A.A., 2010, Skvortsy Barrow Burial Ground. OGPU, Orenburg, 160 p. (In Russ.)
  • Morgunova, N.L., Golyeva, A.A., Evgeniev, A.A., Kryukova, E.A., Kuptsova, L.V., Roslyakova, N.V., Salugina, N.P., Turetsky, M.A., Khokhlov, A.A., Khokhlova, O.S., 2014, Bogolyubovsky kurgan cemetery of Srubnaya culture in Orenburg region. OGPU, Orenburg, 172 p. (In Russ.)
  • Mylnikova, L.N., Selin, D.V., 2017, "Vessels of one morphological tradition (based on materials of the Andronovo (Fedorovka) culture from the Tartas-1 site)", Proceedings of the V (XXI) All-Russian Archaeological Congress in Barnaul – Belokurikha, vol. I, AltGU, Barnaul, pp. 317–321. (In Russ.)
  • Sazanov, A.V., 2022, "C Snp I amphorae: problems of classification and chronology", Journal of Historical, Philological and Cultural Studies, no. 1, pp. 90–144. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.18503/1992-0431-2022-1-75-90–14
  • Sazanov, A.V., 2024, "Roman period narrow-necked light-clay amphorae of the type “D” (C IV D). Typology and chronology", Journal of Historical, Philological and Cultural Studies, no. 3, pp. 30–72. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.18503/1992-0431-2024-3-85-30–72
  • Sviridov, A.N., 2024, Funerary rites of the population in the vicinity of Chersonesos in Roman times: based on materials from the Frontovoe 3 cemetery. Dissertation ... Candidate of Historical Sciences. Moscow, 666 p. (In Russ.)
  • Sviridov, A.N., Yazikov, S.V., 2023, Roman period cemetery Frontovoe 3 in South-Western Crimea: in three parts. Pt. 1. IA RAN, Moscow, 460 p. (In Russ.) http://10.25681/IARAS.2023.978-5-94375-414-2
  • Sviridov, A.N., Yazikov, S.V., 2024a, Roman period cemetery Frontovoe 3 in South-Western Crimea: in three parts. Pt. 2. IA RAN, Moscow, 452 p. (In Russ.) http://10.25681/IARAS.2024.978-5-94375-444-9
  • Sviridov, A.N., Yazikov, S.V., 2024b, Roman period cemetery Frontovoe 3 in South-Western Crimea: in three parts. Pt. 3. IA RAN, Moscow, 436 p. (In Russ.) http://10.25681/IARAS.2024.978-5-94375-445-6
  • Smokotina, A.V., 2018, "Import of goods in amphorae and red slip ware into Bosporus in the late 4th – first half of the 7th centuries", Stratum plus, no. 4, pp. 263–279. (In Russ.)
  • Sukhanov, E.V., 2023, "On the stability of different parameters of the functional parts of clay vessels", "History of ceramics" Bulletin, iss. 5, IA RAN, Moscow, pp. 8–28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25681/IARAS.2023.978-5-94375-401-2.8-28
  • Sukhanov, E.V., 2024a, "Pottery traditions of barbarian population from the South-Western Crimea: some results of research (based on hand-made pottery from Frontovoe 3 necropolis)", Stratum plus, no. 4, pp. 353–369. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55086/sp244353369
  • Sukhanov, E.V., 2024b, "New data about the stability of skills for creating clay vessel shapes", Russian Archaeology, no. 2, pp. 195–211. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869606324020129
  • Sukhanov, E.V., 2024c, "New experiments to study the stability of skills in shaping of clay vessels", "History of ceramics" Bulletin, iss. 6, IA RAN, Moscow, pp. 133–156. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25681/IARAS.2024.978-5-94375-434-0.133-156
  • Sukhanov, E.V., 2025a, "The method for comparison of each other vessel’s shapes (preliminary report)", "History of ceramics" Bulletin, iss. 7, IA RAN, Moscow, pp. 90–125. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25681/IARAS.2025.978-5-94375-467-8.90-125
  • Sukhanov, E.V., 2025b, "On the origin of some forms of clay vessels of the Saltovo-Mayaki culture on the Middle Don", Proceedings of the VII (XXIII) All-Russian Archaeological Congress. Vol. II. Krasnoyarsk, October 6–10, 2025, SFU, Krasnoyarsk, pp. 255–257. (In Russ.)
  • Sukhanov, E.V., 2026, "Single-potter’s vessel shapes: from ethnographic and experimental data to archaeological practice", The Lower Volga Archaeological Bulletin, № 2. (in print) (In Russ.)
  • Tsetlin, Yu.B., 2016, "Random variations in the shape of clay vessels", KSIA, iss. 245-II, pp. 265–274. (In Russ.)
  • Tsetlin, Yu.B., 2018, "On general approach and methods of vessels’ shapes systematic study", Shapes of clay vessels as an object of study. Historical-and-cultural approach, IA RAN, Moscow, pp. 124–179. (In Russ.)
  • Gandon, E., Coyle, T., Bootsma, R.J., Roux, V., Endler, J., 2018, "Individuals Among the Pots: How Do Traditional Ceramic Shapes Vary Between Potters?", Ecological Psychology, 30 (4), pp. 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2018.1438200
  • Gandon, E., Nonaka, T., Coyle, T., Coyle, E., Sonabend, R., Ogbonnaya, C., Endler, J., Roux, V., 2021, "Cultural transmission and perception of vessel shapes among Hebron potters", Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 63, no. 101334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2021.101334
  • Graves, M.W., 1991, "Pottery Production and Distribution Among the Kalinga: A Study of Household and Regional Organization and Differentiation", Ceramic ethnoarchaeology, The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 112–143.
  • Harush, O., Glauber, N., Zoran, A., Grosman, L., 2019, "On quantifying and visualizing the potter's personal style", Journal of Archaeological Science, vol. 108, no. 104973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2019.104973
  • Harush, O., Roux, V., Karasik, A., Grosman, L., 2020, "Social signatures in standardized ceramic production – A 3-D approach to ethnographic data", Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, vol. 60, no. 101208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2020.101208
  • Kramer, C., 1985, "Ceramic ethnoarchaeology", Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 14, pp. 77–102.
  • Longacre, W., 1991, "Sources of Ceramic Variability Among the Kalinga of Northern Luzon", Ceramic ethnoarchaeology, The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 95–111.
  • Roux, V., Karasik, A., 2018, "Standardized Vessels and number of potters: looking for individual production", Artisans Rule: Product Standardization and Craft Specialization in Prehistoric Society, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Cambridge, pp. 20–39.
Download pdf
up
Search
ISSN: 1814-1692 eISSN: 2782-2842 DOI: 10.31833/UAV