Ufa Archaeological Herald

The article analyzes the outside ditch-wall earthworks. A ditch-wall is a structural element of the belting structures in Bronze Age Sintashta-Petrovka fortified settlements located in the Southern Trans-Urals and Northern Kazakhstan. The aim of the study is to determine the place and role of outside structures in the context of discussing the functional purpose of fortified settlement fencing systems. The proposed work implies analyzing the array of data obtained with decryption of aerial photography, geophysical surveys and excavations of archeological sites of this type. The studied materials reveal outside ditch-wall earthworks systems or their components (extra mounds) in 21 out of 29 settlements studied. Such consistency may indirectly indicate the utilitarian significance of the discussed features. The characteristics of the structures vary significantly depending on the research methods. Based on the revealed outside earthworks, the settlements under consideration are divided into three categories: settlements where no outside structures are found, settlements with an extra mound (or "glacis"), settlements where an outside ditch-wall earthworks system is identified by various methods. There are two main approaches to explaining the origin and functional purpose of these structures. The first approach is associated with a group of settlements where only outside mounds are found. It involves the unintentional formation of a "glacis" during the ditch sampling or cleaning. The second approach is associated with a larger group of sites where outside ditch-wall earthworks are identified. It involves the construction of these systems to serve as an additional line of defense. The additional defense line provided a tactical advantage to the defenders, which must be taken into account when analyzing the functional purpose of the enclosing systems of Sintashta-Petrovka fortified settlement.

Southern Trans-Urals, Bronze Age, fortified settlements, ditch-wall systems, outside earthworks, glacis

• Alayeva, I.P., Muravyev, L.A., Molchanov, I.V., 2024, “Experience of electrical survey of the Bronze Age Zvyagino-4 settlement site (Southern Trans-Urals)”, Ufa Archaeological Herald, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 689–696. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31833/uav/2024.24.4.045
• Anisimov, N.P., 2009, “Arkaim is the land of the cards. Empiricism of the Trans-Ural Steppe Space”, Akademicheskij vestnik UralNIIproekt RAASN, no. 2, pp. 16–21. (In Russ.)
• Balkov, E.V., Karin, Yu.G., Fadeev, D.I., 2024, “Development of low-depth electromagnetic profiling technology and testing of new approaches”, Monitoring the condition of structures and foundations: diagnostics, assessment and forecasting: Collection of materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (Sochi, April 24–26, 2024), Sochi, pp. 29–32. (In Russ.)
• Batanina, I.M., Ivanova, N.O., 1995, “Archaeological map of the Arkaim Nature Reserve”, Arkaim. Researches. The search. Discoveries, ed. G.B. Zdanovich, Kamennyj poyas, Chelyabinsk, pp. 159–195. (In Russ.)
• Batanina, N.S., Batanin, S.A., 2015, “Transformations of the architectural appearance of the Stepnoe fortified settlement according to remote sensing data”, Ethnic interactions in the Southern Urals: proceedings of the VI All-Russian Scientific Conference, Chelyabinsk, September 28, 2015, CHGKM, Chelyabinsk, pp. 52–58. (In Russ.)
• Batanina, N.S., Kupriyanova, E.V., Muraviev, L.A., 2023, “Issues in the use of remote sensing data in the tasks of a comprehensive study of bronze age settlements (on the example of the chelyabinsk region)”, Yugra State University Bulletin, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 57–69. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.18822/byusu20230457-69
• Bakhshiev, I.I., Noskevich, V.V., Nasretdinov, R.R., 2018, “Geophysical and Remote Studies of the Ulak-1 Fortified Settlement of the Bronze Age in Bashkir Trans-Urals: the Correlation of the Obtained Data with the Results of the Archaeological Excavations”, The Volga River Region Archaeology, no. 3 (25), pp. 30–44. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24852/2018.3.25.30.44
• Berseneva, N.A., Epimakhov, A.V., Noskevich, V.V., Fedorova, N.V., 2015, “Capabilities of Synthesizing Geophysical and Archaeological Information in the Interpretation of Excavation Results (By the Example of the Bronze Age Settlement of Kamenny Ambar)”, Vestnik Arheologii, Antropologii i Etnografii, no. 1 (28), pp. 4–14. (In Russ.)
• Gening, V.F., Zdanovich, G.B., Gening, V.V., 1992, Syntashta. Archaeological sites of the Aryan tribes of the Ural-Kazakh steppes. Part 1, South Ural Book Publishing House, Chelyabinsk, 407 p. (In Russ.)
• Ancient Ust’ye..., 2013, Ancient Ust’ye. The strengthened settlement of a Bronze Age in Southern Trans-Ural, ed. N.B. Vinogradov, Abris, Chelyabinsk, 482 p. (In Russ.)
• Epimakhov, A.V., 2002, The Southern Trans-Urals in the Middle Bronze Age. YuUrGU, Chelyabinsk, 170 p. (In Russ.)
• Epimakhov, A.V., 2010, Report on the archaeological excavations of the fortified settlement of Kamenny Ambar in 2008, Ekaterinburg, 198 p. (Archive of the Museum-Reserve “Arkaim”. F. R-1998. Op. № 3. D. 277). (In Russ.)
• Epimakhov, A.V., 2012, Report on the archaeological excavations of the fortified settlement of Kamenny Ambar in 2011, Chelyabinsk, 231 p. (Archive of the Museum-Reserve “Arkaim”. F. R-1998. Op. № 3. D. 278). (In Russ.)
• Epimakhov, A.V., Semyan, I.A., 2013, “Parameter estimation of Bronze Age fortified settlement Kamennyj Ambar”, Science of SUSU: Proceedings of the 65th Scientific Conference, Chelyabinsk, April 15–17, 2013, vol. 1, YuUrGU, Chelyabinsk, pp. 175–178. (In Russ.)
• Epimakhov, A.V., Semyan, I.A., 2014, “Fortified settlements of the Bronze Age in the Southern Urals: key features and functions”, Dialogue of Eurasian cultures in the archeology of Kazakhstan. A collection of scientific articles dedicated to the 90th anniversary of the birth of the outstanding archaeologist K.A. Akishev, Saryarka, Astana, pp. 334–340. (In Russ.)
• Zdanovich, G.B., 1988, The Bronze Age of the Ural-Kazakh steppes (fundamentals of periodization). UrFU, Sverdlovsk, 184 p. (In Russ.)
• Zdanovich, G.B., Batanina, I.M., Levit, N.V., Batanin, S.A., 2003, Archaeological atlas of the Chelyabinsk region. Iss. 1. Steppe-forest-steppe. Kizilsky district. South-Ural Publishing house, Chelyabinsk, 239 p. (In Russ.)
• Zdanovich, G.B., Batanina, I.M., 2007, Arkaim – the Land of Cities: Space and Images (Arkaim – Research Horizons). Krokus, South-Ural publishing house, Chelyabinsk, 260 p. (In Russ.)
• Zdanovich, G.B., Malyutina, T.S., Zdanovich, D.G., 2020, Arkaim. The Archaeology of fortified settlements: Monograph in 2 books. Book 1: Dwellings and living space. ChelGU, Chelyabinsk, 450 p. (In Russ.)
• Zdanovich, G.B., Malyutina, T.S., Zdanovich, D.G., 2022, Arkaim. The Archaeology of fortified settlements: Monograph in 2 books. Book 2: Fortifications and public space. ChelGU, Chelyabinsk, 383 p. (In Russ.)
• Zdanovich, G.B., Malyutina, T.S., 2004, “The fortified settlement Alandskoe. Building horizons and ceramic complexes (on the problem of interrelation of the Sintashta-Arkaim and Petrovskaya cultures)”, Ethnic interactions in the Southern Urals: proceedings of the II Regional Scientific and Practical Conference, Chelyabinsk, October 25–27, 2004, Rifey, Chelyabinsk, pp. 56–61. (In Russ.)
• Ivanova, N.O., 1996, Report. Security excavations of the Bersuat settlement. Chelyabinsk, 25 p. (Archive of the Museum-reserve “Arkaim”. F. R-1998. Op. № 3. D. 146). (In Russ.)
• Kupriyanova, E.V., Zdanovich, D.G., Hanks, B.K., 2023, “Materials of the excavations of the Stepnoye settlement in 2008–2009”, Stepnoye: New Horizons, ed. E.V. Kupriyanova, ChelGU, Chelyabinsk, pp. 7–65. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.47475/9785727119280
• Malyutina, T.S., 1998, Report. Archaeological investigations of the fortified settlement of Kuisak in 1992. Chelyabinsk, 57 p. (Archive of the Museum-reserve “Arkaim”. F. R-1998. Op. № 3. D. 136). (In Russ.)
• Muraviev, L.A., Batanina, N.S., Kupriyanova, E.V., Mamontov, A.V., 2025, “Changes in the architecture of the fortified settlement of Stepnoye: climate, Migration and modern interventions (according to remote research data)”, Ufa Archaeological Herald, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 290–306. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31833/uav/2025.25.2.022
• Noskevich, V.V., Fedorova, N.V., Bebnev, A.S., Vdovin, A.G., Mekhonshina, T.L., 2014, “Resalts of the geophysical research of Bronze Age archaeological monuments Andreevskoe (Southern Ural Mountains)”, Ural’skij geofiziceskij vestnik, no. 1 (23), pp. 72–80. (In Russ.)
• Noskevich, V.V., Fedorova, N.V., Muraviev, L.A., 2010, “Mapping of archaeological settlement by means of magnetometer”, Ural’skij geofiziceskij vestnik, no. 2 (17), pp. 47–52. (In Russ.)
• Noskevich, V.V., Fedorova, N.V., 2020, “Geophysical researches of the settlements of the Bronze century Konoplyanka-1 and Konoplyanka-2 (South Ural)”, Geophysics, no. 2, pp. 51–57. (In Russ.)
• Noskevich, V.V., Fedorova, N.V., Petrov, F.N., Batanina, N.S., 2021, “Reconstruction of the Settlement Levoberezhnoe Plan of the Bronze Age (South Ural, Russia)”, The Volga River Region Archaeology, no. 3 (37), pp. 142–154. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24852/pa2021.3.37.142.154
• Petrov, F.N., 2020, Levoberezhnoye – the fortified settlement of cattle breeders and metallurgists of the Bronze Age. Materials of the exhibition of the Arkaim Museum-Reserve. Nasledie, Chelyabinsk, 20 p. (In Russ.)
• Punegov, B.N., 1996, Report on the results of geophysical research at the Bronze Age settlement of Bersuat and the Chekotai mound in 1996. Chelyabinsk, 21 p. (Personal archive of the author of the article). (In Russ.)
• Punegov, B.N., 1997, Report on the results of geophysical research at the Bronze Age settlement of Aland in 1997. Chelyabinsk, 20 p. (Personal archive of the author of the article). (In Russ.)
• Punegov, B.N., Batanina, I.M., 2020, “Geophysical methods in the study of the fortified settlement of Arkaim. Methodology and research results”, Zdanovich, G.B., Malyutina, T.S., Zdanovich, D.G. Arkaim. The Archaeology of fortified settlements: Monograph in 2 books. Book 1: Dwellings and living space, ChelGU, Chelyabinsk, pp. 421–428. (In Russ.)
• Semyan, I.A., 2014, “Military factor in cultural genesis of Sintashta culture based on materials of fortified settlements”, Process of the cultural genesis at the early stage of the Late Bronze age in the Volga-Ural region: problems of chronology, periodisation and historiography: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, Samara, May 12–14, 2014, PGSGA, Samara, pp. 107–113. (In Russ.)
• Soldatkin, N.V., 2020, “Architecture of fortified settlements belonging to the Sintashta-Petrovka type in the existing versions of visual reconstructions”, Vestnik Arheologii, Antropologii i Etnografii, no. 1, pp. 15–24. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2020-48-1-2
• Soldatkin, N.V., 2021, “Configurations of Fortified Settlements of the Sintashta-Petrovka Type: Forms, Sizes, Transformations”, Tomsk State University Journal, no. 462, pp. 161–172. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/462/20
• Soldatkin, N.V., 2024, “Criteria for identifying, number and territory of Sintashta-Petrovka type fortified settlements”, Kazakhstan Archeology, no. 1 (23), pp. 218–232. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.52967/akz2024.1.23.218.232
• Stokolos, V.S., 1972, Report on the field work of the Chelyabinsk archaeological expedition. Chelyabinsk, 28 fig., 15 p. (Scientific archive of IA RAN. F-1. R-1. No. 4745. 15 l. No. 4745a). (In Russ.)
• Ulchitsky, O.A., 2022, “The typology of South Ural fortified settlements Bronze Age”, Akademicheskij vestnik UralNIIproekt RAASN, no. 3 (54), pp. 15–20. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.25628/UNIIP.2022.54.3.003
• Fedorova, N.V., Noskevich, V.V., Ivanchenko, V.S., Bebnev, A.S., Malikov, A.V., 2013, “Geophysical methods of research of archaeological monuments Sarym-Sakly and Vorovskaya Yama (Southern Ural Mountains)”, Ural’skij geofiziceskij vestnik, no. 2 (22), pp. 46–53. (In Russ.)
• Chechushkov, A.V., 2012, Report on archaeological exploration in the valley of the Nizhny Toguzak River in the territory of the Varnensky district of the Chelyabinsk region in 2012. Chelyabinsk, 37 p. (Scientific archive of IA RAN). (In Russ.)
• Chechushkov, I.V., Yakimov, A.S., Dakovich, G., 2018, “Architectural and planning design of Sintashta-Petrovka settlements and the issue of the Bronze Age warfare”, Russian Archeology, no. 3, pp. 75–92. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S086960630001661-6
• Chechushkov, I.V., Yakimov, A.S., Dakovich, G., 2019, “Towards the Archaeological Interpretation for the Ditch and Wall Systems and the Issue of Defensibility of the Sintashta-Petrovka Forts”, Stratum Plus, no. 2, pp. 345–357. (In Russ.)
• Sharapov, D.V., Petrova, L.Yu., Yakimov, A.S., Toporkov, I.N., Batanina, N.S., 2024, “Phosphorus as a predictor of Bronze Age settlement architecture in the Southern Trans-Urals”, Geoarchaeology and Archaeological Mineralogy-2024. Proceedings of XI All-Russian Scientific Conference with international participation named after Prof. V.V. Zaykov, YuUrGGPU, Miass, Chelyabinsk, pp. 63–69. (In Russ.)
• Sharapova, S.V., 2007, Report on the excavations of the Kamenny Ambar settlement (Olgino) in the Kartalinsky district of the Chelyabinsk region in 2006. Ekaterinburg, 37 p. (Archive of the Arkaim Museum-Reserve, F. R-1998, Op. no. 3, D. 276). (In Russ.)
• Sharapova, S.V., Krause, R., Molchanov, I.V., Shtobbe, A., Soldatkin, N.V., 2014, “Multidisciplinary investigations of Konoplyanka settlement in the Southern Trans-Urals: preliminary results”, Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 101–109. (In Russ.)
• Fornasier, J. 2014, “Befestigte Siedlungen der Bronzezeit im Trans-Ural – eine Bestandsaufnahme”, Zwischen Tradition und Innovation: Studien zur Bronzezeit im Trans-Ural (Russische Fuderation), eds. R. Krause, L.N. Korjakova, Verlag Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn, p. 1–137.
• Epimakhov, A.V., Berseneva, N.A., Fedorova, N.V., Noskevich, V.V., Panteleeva, S.E., 2021, “Fortification lines of the Kamennyi Ambar settlement”, The Bronze Age in the Karagaily-Ayat Region (Trans-Urals, Russia): Culture, Environment and Economy, eds. R. Krause, L.N. Korjakova, Verlag Dr.Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn, p. 101–158.
• The Bronze Age, 2021, The Bronze Age in the Karagaily-Ayat Region (Trans-Urals, Russia): Culture, Environment and Economy. eds. R. Krause, L.N. Korjakova, Verlag Dr.Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn, 556 p.
• Schmidt, A, Linford, P, Linford, N, David, A, Gaffney, C, Sarris, A., Fassbinder, J., 2015, EAC Guidelines for the use of Geophysics in Archaeology: Questions to Ask and Points to Consider. EAC Guidelines 2. Europae Archaeologia Consilium (EAC), Association Internationale sans But Lucratif (AISBL), Namur, 135 p.