ISSN: 1814-1692 eISSN: 2782-2842 DOI: 10.31833/UAV

Social & Cultural Space in the Mesolithic and Neolithic Trans-Urals

Year: 2025

Pages: 80-89

UDC: 902/903

Number: Volume 25, issue 1

Type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31833/uav/2025.25.1.006

Topic: Mesolithic and Neolithic Episodes

Authors: Mosin, Vadim S.

Summary:

The concept of social & cultural space is basic for archaeology, as it integrates the concepts of physical and social systems, social needs reflected in the tangible culture and time. This article aims to define the criteria and to consider the origins of the social & cultural space in the Neolithic Trans-Urals. The Mesolithic and Neolithic Trans-Urals stand out with technological and cultural peculiarities. These peculiarities list siliceous raw materials, the flaking system and typological set of tools, types of tools original for the mentioned territory, cultural traditions in ceramic ware (cultural and chronological complexes). One of the significant natural resources in the Stone Age is siliceous raw material for producing tools. Siliceous rocks are the most common in the bedrock and superficial deposits along the eastern slopes of the Southern and Middle Urals. Pritobolye does not reveal siliceous rocks natural deposits. It means such rocks could have been brought here only by people. Mesolithic hunter groups used Trans-Ural siliceous rocks for making tools but they never crossed the Tobol River right bank. The materials of Trans-Urals Mesolithic monuments have stone tools complexes similar to one another by their main characteristics. Some Mesolithic complexes of the Trans-Urals contain such typical tools as geometric microliths, for instance, asymmetric trapezoids and triangles, while other sites lack such artifacts. The sites in both categories are known so far to be equal in number. The sites with asymmetric trapezoids are not concentrated in a particular area, neither are the sites without them. Furthermore, they are found throughout the entire Trans-Urals. Since the workmanship technology of the mentioned complexes is the same, presumably these are two variants of the same Mesolithic tradition. In contrast Neolithic monuments are far more common and stretch across the Tobol and Ishim interfluves. The study implies the mapping of the Trans-Urals Mesolithic and Neolithic monuments that preserved the main traditions. The mapping allows determining the social & cultural space of the Trans-Urals Neolithic. This space is a historical space considered from the point of view of the existing cultural traditions in certain societies in in time and space of 7th5th millennia BC.

Keywords:

Mesolithic, Neolithic, Trans-Urals, siliceous rocks, cultural traditions, social & cultural space

References:

  • Enshin, D.N., Skochina, S.N., 2023, “The Lower Ishim Basin in the Sociocultural Space of the Trans-Ural Neolithic (based on data from the Mergen archaeological microregion)”, Vestnik Arheologii, Antropologii i Etnografii, no. 3 (62), pp. 5–13. (In Russ.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2023-62-3-1
  • Zhilin, M.G., Savchenko, S.N., Kosinskaya, L.L., Serikov, Yu.B., Alexandrovsky, A.L., Lapteva, E.G., Korona, O.M., Kosintsev, P.A., 2020, Mesolithic Sites in Gorbunovsky Peat Bog. Nestor-Istoriya, Moscow, St. Petersburg, 368 p. (In Russ.)
  • Seibert, V.F., Potemkina, T.M., 1981, “On the question of the Mesolithic of the forest-steppe part of the Tobolsk-Irtysh Interfluve”, Sovetskaya arheologiya, no. 3, pp. 107–129. (In Russ.)
  • Zaibert, V.F., Pleshakov, A.A., Tyulebaev, A.Zh., 2012, Atbasarian culture. IA A.H. Margulan, Astana, 352 p. (In Russ.)
  • Zakh, V.A., Zimina, O.Yu., Ryabogina, N.E., Skochina, S.N., Usacheva, I.V., 2008, Holocene landscapes and cultural interaction in the Tobolsk-Ishim interfluve. Nauka, Novosibirsk, 212 p. (In Russ.)
  • Zykin, V.S., Zykina, V.S., Orlova, L.A., 2000, “Stratigraphy and basic patterns of changes in the natural environment and climate in the Pleistocene and Holocene of Western Siberia”, Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia, no. 1, pp. 3–22. (In Russ.)
  • The Stone Age, 2021, ed. M.Sh. Galimova, AN RT, Kazan, 444 p. (Archeology of Volga-Urals. Vol. 1) (In Russ.)
  • Krizhevskaya L.Ya., 1991, “The Mesolithic settlement of Tashkovo IV and some general issues of the Mesolithic of the Urals”, Ural Archaeology Issues, vol. 20, ed. V.T. Kovaleva, UrGU, Ekaterinburg, pp. 30–45. (In Russ.)
  • Matyushin, G.N., 1976, The Mesolithic of the Southern Urals. Nauka, Moscow, 368 p. (In Russ.)
  • Mosin, V.S., 2010, “The ecosocial adaptation of the population of the center of Northern Eurasia in the Late Pleistocene – Early Holocene (experience of archaeological modeling)”, Ural Historical Journal, vol. 2 (27), pp. 4–12. (In Russ.)
  • Mosin, V.S., 2016, “Sociocultural Space in the Late Stone Age”, Perm University Herald. History, vol. 1 (32), pp. 19–27. (In Russ.)
  • Mosin, V.S., Nikolsky, V.Yu., 2008, Flint and jasper in the material culture of the Stone Age population of the Southern Urals. UrO RAN, Ekaterinburg, 196 p. (In Russ.)
  • Mosin, V.S., 2012, “Mesolithic sites of the forest-steppe Trans-Urals”, Perm University Herald. History, vol. 1 (18), pp. 50–66. (In Russ.)
  • Nekhoroshev, P.E., Girya, E.Yu., 2004, “Some research results of the Upper Paleolithic site in the Kulyurt-Tamak cave (Southern Urals)”, Ufa Archaeological Herald, vol. 5, pp. 12–35. (In Russ.)
  • Pavlov, P.Y., 2008, “The Paleolithic of Northeastern Europe: New Data”, Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia, no. 1 (33), pp. 33–45. (In Russ.)
  • Pavlov, P.Y., 2012, “Cultural interactions of the inhabitants of the Urals during the Paleolithic age”, Perm University Herald. History, vol. 1 (18), pp. 6–23. (In Russ.)
  • Panova, N.K., Bykova, G.V., 1992, “Palynological characteristics of Ignatievskaya Cave deposits”, Petrin, V.T. Paleolithic sanctuary in Ignatievskaya Cave in the Southern Urals, Nauka, Novosibirsk, pp. 192–196. (In Russ.)
  • Petrin, V.T., Smirnov, N.G., 1975, “Paleolithic site in Shikaevka on the right bank of the Tobol”, Ural Archaeology Issues, iss. 13, ed. V.F. Gening, UrGU, Sverdlovsk, pp. 75–85. (In Russ.)
  • Petrin, V.T., 1992, Paleolithic sanctuary in Ignatievskaya cave in the Southern Urals. Nauka, Novosibirsk, 208 p. (In Russ.)
  • Serikov, Yu.B., 1988, “The material culture of the Mesolithic population of the Middle Urals”, The material culture of the ancient population of the Urals and Western Siberia, ed. V.T. Kovaleva, UrGU, Sverdlovsk, pp. 14–18. (In Russ.)
  • Serikov, Yu.B., 1989, “Productive forms of labor of the population of the Middle Urals in the Stone Age”, The formation and development of a productive economy in the Urals, eds. V.D. Viktorova, N.G. Smirnov. UrO AN USSR, Sverdlovsk, pp. 32–45. (In Russ.)
  • Serikov, Yu.B., 2007, Garinskaya Paleolithic site and some issues of Ural paleolithic studies. NGSPA, Nizhny Tagil, 137 p. (In Russ.)
  • Serikov, Yu.B., 2008, “New finds of geometric microliths in the Middle Urals”, Proceedings of the Kama Archaeological and ethnographic expedition, iss. 5, ed. A.M. Belavin. PGPU, Perm, pp. 97–100. (In Russ.)
Download pdf
up
Search
ISSN: 1814-1692 eISSN: 2782-2842 DOI: 10.31833/UAV