Ufa Archaeological Herald

The Mangyshlak Peninsula is revealed with the Shebir type of the Khvalynsk culture. It raises a number of issues regarding the migration processes associated with the Khvalynsk population. The Chalcolithic sites in the area are discovered with materials close to the early Caspian culture ceramics or the late Altatin pottery. The conclusions are mainly based on stone tool analysis. This study presents findings on ceramics obtained with A.A. Bobrinsky’s method of instrumental analysis. The research analyses 92 ceramic samples attributed to Shebir, Kuiruk, and Sazdinsky types. The findings establish mass pottery traditions. They imply fat silt as plastic raw materials and Inoceramus shells as admixtures, patchwork, hot and cold treatment of vessels to make them stronger. The way the Shebir people viewed the raw material selection and the way they composed their compounds make their tradition resemble the Khvalynsk culture pottery traditions in the Lower Volga region. However, these traditions differ in the Shebir tribes that used contaminated silty clays, white mineral grus and chamotte admixtures. The Mangyshlak Peninsula shows no substrate for forming the Shebir type. In addition, the Lower Volga Khvalynsk ancientries prevail chronologically over the Mangyshlak ancientries. This allows assuming that the Khvalynsk people appeared on the Caspian shore driven by the impetus from the Northern Caspian. The Kuiruk ceramics stands out with a thickened exterior - a collar. This feature equates this ceramics with the Caspian culture pottery found in the Lower Volga region prior to the Khvalynsk Culture. Presumably, certain groups of Caspian people could have reached the Magyshlak Peninsula earlier than the Khvalynsk people did.

Chalcolithic, Mangyshlak Peninsula, ceramics morphology, pottery technology, ceramics instrumental analysis

• Enshin, D.N., Skochina, S.N., 2023, “The Lower Ishim Basin in the Sociocultural Space of the Trans-Ural Neolithic (based on data from the Mergen archaeological microregion)”, Vestnik Arheologii, Antropologii i Etnografii, no. 3 (62), pp. 5–13. (In Russ.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2023-62-3-1 
• Zhilin, M.G., Savchenko, S.N., Kosinskaya, L.L., Serikov, Yu.B., Alexandrovsky, A.L., Lapteva, E.G., Korona, O.M., Kosintsev, P.A., 2020, Mesolithic Sites in Gorbunovsky Peat Bog. Nestor-Istoriya, Moscow, St. Petersburg, 368 p. (In Russ.)
• Seibert, V.F., Potemkina, T.M., 1981, “On the question of the Mesolithic of the forest-steppe part of the Tobolsk-Irtysh Interfluve”, Sovetskaya arheologiya, no. 3, pp. 107–129. (In Russ.)
• Zaibert, V.F., Pleshakov, A.A., Tyulebaev, A.Zh., 2012, Atbasarian culture. IA A.H. Margulan, Astana, 352 p. (In Russ.)
• Zakh, V.A., Zimina, O.Yu., Ryabogina, N.E., Skochina, S.N., Usacheva, I.V., 2008, Holocene landscapes and cultural interaction in the Tobolsk-Ishim interfluve. Nauka, Novosibirsk, 212 p. (In Russ.)
• Zykin, V.S., Zykina, V.S., Orlova, L.A., 2000, “Stratigraphy and basic patterns of changes in the natural environment and climate in the Pleistocene and Holocene of Western Siberia”, Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia, no. 1, pp. 3–22. (In Russ.)
• The Stone Age, 2021, ed. M.Sh. Galimova, AN RT, Kazan, 444 p. (Archeology of Volga-Urals. Vol. 1) (In Russ.)
• Krizhevskaya L.Ya., 1991, “The Mesolithic settlement of Tashkovo IV and some general issues of the Mesolithic of the Urals”, Ural Archaeology Issues, vol. 20, ed. V.T. Kovaleva, UrGU, Ekaterinburg, pp. 30–45. (In Russ.)
• Matyushin, G.N., 1976, The Mesolithic of the Southern Urals. Nauka, Moscow, 368 p. (In Russ.)
• Mosin, V.S., 2010, “The ecosocial adaptation of the population of the center of Northern Eurasia in the Late Pleistocene – Early Holocene (experience of archaeological modeling)”, Ural Historical Journal, vol. 2 (27), pp. 4–12. (In Russ.)
• Mosin, V.S., 2016, “Sociocultural Space in the Late Stone Age”, Perm University Herald. History, vol. 1 (32), pp. 19–27. (In Russ.)
• Mosin, V.S., Nikolsky, V.Yu., 2008, Flint and jasper in the material culture of the Stone Age population of the Southern Urals. UrO RAN, Ekaterinburg, 196 p. (In Russ.)
• Mosin, V.S., 2012, “Mesolithic sites of the forest-steppe Trans-Urals”, Perm University Herald. History, vol. 1 (18), pp. 50–66. (In Russ.)
• Nekhoroshev, P.E., Girya, E.Yu., 2004, “Some research results of the Upper Paleolithic site in the Kulyurt-Tamak cave (Southern Urals)”, Ufa Archaeological Herald, vol. 5, pp. 12–35. (In Russ.)
• Pavlov, P.Y., 2008, “The Paleolithic of Northeastern Europe: New Data”, Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia, no. 1 (33), pp. 33–45. (In Russ.)
• Pavlov, P.Y., 2012, “Cultural interactions of the inhabitants of the Urals during the Paleolithic age”, Perm University Herald. History, vol. 1 (18), pp. 6–23. (In Russ.)
• Panova, N.K., Bykova, G.V., 1992, “Palynological characteristics of Ignatievskaya Cave deposits”, Petrin, V.T. Paleolithic sanctuary in Ignatievskaya Cave in the Southern Urals, Nauka, Novosibirsk, pp. 192–196. (In Russ.)
• Petrin, V.T., Smirnov, N.G., 1975, “Paleolithic site in Shikaevka on the right bank of the Tobol”, Ural Archaeology Issues, iss. 13, ed. V.F. Gening, UrGU, Sverdlovsk, pp. 75–85. (In Russ.)
• Petrin, V.T., 1992, Paleolithic sanctuary in Ignatievskaya cave in the Southern Urals. Nauka, Novosibirsk, 208 p. (In Russ.)
• Serikov, Yu.B., 1988, “The material culture of the Mesolithic population of the Middle Urals”, The material culture of the ancient population of the Urals and Western Siberia, ed. V.T. Kovaleva, UrGU, Sverdlovsk, pp. 14–18. (In Russ.)
• Serikov, Yu.B., 1989, “Productive forms of labor of the population of the Middle Urals in the Stone Age”, The formation and development of a productive economy in the Urals, eds. V.D. Viktorova, N.G. Smirnov. UrO AN USSR, Sverdlovsk, pp. 32–45. (In Russ.)
• Serikov, Yu.B., 2007, Garinskaya Paleolithic site and some issues of Ural paleolithic studies. NGSPA, Nizhny Tagil, 137 p. (In Russ.)
• Serikov, Yu.B., 2008, “New finds of geometric microliths in the Middle Urals”, Proceedings of the Kama Archaeological and ethnographic expedition, iss. 5, ed. A.M. Belavin. PGPU, Perm, pp. 97–100. (In Russ.)
• Serikov, Yu.B., 2019, “Geometrical Trapezes with Side Notches on the Territory of the Middle Trans-Urals”, The Volga River Region Archaeology, no. 3 (29), pp. 8–20. (In Russ.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.24852/pa2019.3.29.8.20 
• Sorokin, P., 1992, Society, culture, and personality. Politizdat, Moscow, 543 p. (In Russ.)
• Stoyanov, V.E., Krizhevskaya, L.Ya., Starkov, V.F., 1977, “The Mesolithic site of Sukhrino I on Iseti”, Archaeological research in the Urals and Western Siberia, ed. V.E. Stoyanov, UrGU, Sverdlovsk, pp. 72–84. (In Russ.)
• Timofeev, V.I., Zaitseva, G.I., 1996, List of radiocarbon dates of the Neolithic, Neolithic of Northern Eurasia, ed. S.V. Oshibkina. Nauka, Moscow, pp. 330–348. (Archeology from ancient times to the Middle Ages) (In Russ.)
• Usacheva, I.V., 1999, “The Mesolithic site on Andreevsky Lake”, Conservation archaeological research in the Middle Urals, vol. 3, ed. S.E. Chirkin, Bank kul’turnoj informacii, Ekaterinburg, pp. 22–29. (In Russ.)
• Khotinsky, K.A., Nemkova, V.K., Surova, T.G., 1982, ”The main stages of the development of vegetation and climate of the Urals in the Holocene”, Archaeological research of the North of Eurasia, ed. V.E. Stoyanov. UrGU, Sverdlovsk, pp. 145–153. (In Russ.)
• Chirkina, N.M., Kuzmin, Ya.V., 2018, “New radiocarbon dates of the Mesolithic – Early Iron Age of the Trans-Urals”, Ural Historical Journal, no. 2 (59), pp. 124–134. (In Russ.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.30759/1728-9718-2018-2(59)-124-134 
• Shevnina, I.V., 2024, “Mahanjarian Culture in the Context of Transcultural Interactions”, Ural Historical Journal, no. 3 (84), pp. 34–45. (In Russ.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.30759/1728-9718-2024-3(84)-34-45 
• Shorin, A.F., Shorina, A.A., 2020, “Neolithic Trans-Ural Migrations in the Light of Radiocarbon Chronology”, Stratum plus, no. 2, pp. 31–55. (In Russ.)