Year: 2026
Pages: 386–408
Number: Volume 26, issue 2
Type: scientific article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31833/uav/2026.26.2.021
Topic: Integrated Researches: Metallurgy, Livestock Keeping, Ceramics
Authors: Bukacheva Anastasia O., Ankusheva Polina S., Kabanova Larisa Y., Yuminov Anatolij M.
The article is the first-time presentation of the complex of stone tools attributed to the Southern Urals Alakul culture and utilized at copper fields.The source of the study is a collection excavated at the Vorovskaya Yama mine (Kizilsky District, Chelyabinsk Region) operated in 1600s-1500s BC. 83 items are functionally attributed using a traceological analysis; the items are exposed to petrographical research and planigraphic distribution at the miners’ settlement site. The petrographic fund of the collection is represented by 11 rock types with predominant basalt, andesibasalt, serpentite and siltstone. Most of the raw materials are available for development in the nearest vicinity of the mine (up to 5–7 km). Choosing the raw materials, the miners were driven by the utilization approach and selected the rock based on its function. For instance, impact tools (pickaxes, hammers) required firm basalts and andesite-basalts, while tools for softer soil (hoes) require softer rocks, whereas mold-casting requires a more manageable and softer serpentinite. The morphology and traces peculiarities allow distinguishing and detailing three functional groups of tools: mining tools (40 items), ore-dressing tools (22 items), and metalworking tools (5 items). The spectrum of determined process operations reflect the full production cycle at the mine from ore production and dressing to metalworking, even though the metalworking scale was minor. From the planigraphic point of view, the tools are prone to be situated near building site or domestic waste disposal areas (dump site). However, zones are not clearly distinguished by their industrial intended use (e.g., ore production only or ore dressing only. It means, various process operations took place right inside dwelling areas. The study results in preliminary conclusions on the peculiarities of the tool complex from the Vorovskaya Yama mine in comparison to other Srubnaya-Alakul industrial sites. The collection in question features diverse local rocks, predominant mining tools and no bone tools for ore wet dressing or other process operations registered in a number of simultaneous sites.
Southern Trans-Urals, Late Bronze Age, mining, metal production, Alakul culture, ancient mine, stone tools, tracology, petrography of rocks
Alaeva I.P., 2014. Foundry forms of the Alakul culture of the Trans-Urals (issues of reflecting the level of development of metal production), Proceedings of the IV (XX) All-Russian Archaeological Congress in Kazan, Kazan: Fatherland, vol. I, pp. 520–524.
Ankusheva P.S., Alayeva I.P., Ankushev M.N., Fomichev A.V., Zazovskaya E.P., Blinov I.A., 2021. From Ore to Metal: Exploitation of the Novotemirskoye deposit of the Southern Trans-Urals in the II millennium BC, Archeology, Ethnography and Anthropology of Eurasia, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 30–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17746/1563-0102.2021.49.1.030-038
Ankusheva P.S., Ankushev M.N., Blinov I.A., Artemyev D.A., Alayeva I.P., 2023. Mineralogical and geochemical study of evidence of Alakul metal production at the Vorovskaya Yama mine (Southern Trans-Urals), Russian Archeology, No. 3, pp. 23-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869606323030042
Ankusheva P.S., Ankushev M.N., Blinov I.A., Epimakhov A.V., 2025. Sintashta Culture Mines: The current state of the problem and new analytical data, Ufa Archaeological Bulletin, vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 199–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31833/uav/2025.25.2.016