ISSN: 1814-1692 eISSN: 2782-2842 DOI: 10.31833/UAV

Protovolosovskaya Ceramics from the Upper Volga Region. Parfenkovo 1 Settlement (Moscow Region) Case Study

Year: 2026

Pages: 152–166

UDC: 903.4 (470.311): 903.2

Number: Volume 26, issue 1

Type: scientific article

Summary:

The article examines the complex of Late Neolithic ceramics of the settlement of Parfenkovo 1, located in the Sergiev Posad district of the Moscow region on the left bank of the Dubna River. During the exploration in 2021, Neolithic ceramics of two traditions — combed and pit-combed - were revealed in the filling of the utility pit. Six vessels made of silty clays using organic solutions and mineral impurities (soil, chamotte, shell, mica, talc) have been reconstructed from more than three hundred fragments. The ornamentation of the vessels is characterized by the predominance of a variety of comb prints combined with rounded and conical pits, probably deposited by belemnites, which makes it possible to correlate this complex with the Protovolos ceramic tradition. The radiocarbon date 4853±40 BP (3709-3527 cal BC) indicates the existence of the complex at the turn of the Late Neolithic and Early Eneolithic. The Parfenkovo materials were compared with reference complexes of the Valdai and Lyalov cultures of the Dubna basin and peat sites of the Upper Volga. It is determined that the formation of the comb ornamental traditions of the region is explained not by population migration, but by the divergence of the types of dimpled-comb ceramics, when different systems of ornamentation develop in certain parts of its distribution area. The impulse for the development of techniques of comb ornamentation of ceramics of the Upper Volga region could have come from both the territory of the Valdai Upland and the Mari Volga region, where such ceramics date back to an earlier time.

Keywords:

Upper Volga, Neolithic, Eneolithic, pit-comb ceramics, Protovolosovskaya ceramics, Dubna River

References:

  • Bader, O.N., 1961, Settlements of the Turbine Type in the Middle Kama Region. Nauka, Moscow, 199p. (MIA, no. 99)
  • Bobrinsky, A.A., 1978, Pottery of Eastern Europe. Nauka, Moscow, 272p.
  • Bobrinsky, A.A., 1999, “Pottery technology as an object of historical and cultural study”, Current issues in the study of ancient pottery, SGPU, Samara, pp.5–109. (In Russ.)
  • Vasilyeva, I.N., Salugina, N.P., 1999, “Experimental method in the study of ancient pottery (on the problem of developing the structure of scientific research using physical modeling)”, Actual problems in the study of ancient ceramics, SGPU, Samara, pp.2–55.
  • Vasilyeva, I.N., 2015, “On the identification of the types of the original plastic raw materials of the oldest pottery and their areas of distribution in the Neolithic era (based on the materials of the Volga region)”, Modern Approaches to the Study of Ancient Pottery in Archaeology, IA RAN, Moscow SGPU, pp. 16–23.
  • Gavrilova, I.V., 1973, “Neolithic Tribes of the Kostroma Volga Region”, Ethnic and Cultural Communities of the Forest and Forest-Steppe Zones of the European Part of the USSR in the Neolithic Era, Nauka, Leningrad, pp. 130–137. (MIA, no.172)
  • Gurina, N.N., Sinitsyna, G.V., 2014, “Site Zabolotie II. Chronological groups of pottery”, Archaeology of lake settlements of the 4th–2nd millennium BC: Chronology of cultures and natural-climatic rhythms. Proceedings of the International Conference Dedicated to the Half-Century Study of Pile Settlements in the North-West of Russia, Periferia, St.Petersburg, p. 184–188.
  • Ancient Hunters..., 1997, Ancient Hunters and Fishermen of the Moscow Region: Based on the Materials of the Multilayered Stone and Bronze Age Settlement of Voymezhnoye 1. IA RAN, Moscow, 147 p.
  • Zhilin, M.G., Kostyleva, E.L., Utkin, A.V., Engovatova, A.V., 2002, Mesolithic and Neolithic Cultures of the Upper Volga Region. On Materials from Ivanovskoe VII Site. Nauka, Moscow, 245p.
  • Zimina, M.P., 1981, Neolithic of the Msta River Basin. Nauka, Moscow, 206p.
  • Korolev, A.I., Shalapinin, A.A., 2010, “The radiocarbon dating of early materials of the Volosovo culture of the Middle Volga region”, Izvestia of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 12, no.2 (34), pp. 256–260.
  • Krainov, D.A., 1981, “On the Origin of the Volosov Culture”, Sovetskaya arheologiya, no.2, pp.5–20.
  • Kulkova, M.A., Shalapinin, A.A., 2018, “New data on absolute chronology of the archaeological monuments of Volosovo culture of the Middle Volga forest area”, Izvestiya of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, vol.20, no.3–2(93), pp. 507–509.
  • Lozovskaya, O.V., Lozovsky, V.M., Mazurkevich, A.N., 2013, “Paleoenvironment at transition of Mesolithic-Neolithic in Zamostje 2 site (Upper Volga Bassin)”, VIII All-Russian Conference on the Study of the Quaternary Period “Fundamental Problems of the Quaternary, Results of Research, and Main Directions for Further Studies”, YuNC RAN, Rostov-on-Don, pp. 379–382.
  • Lozovskaya, O.V., Lozovsky, V.M., 2018, “Environment and subsistence conditions in late Mesolithic and Neolithic at site Zamostje 2”, Site of Zamostye 2, and the Development of the Natural Environment of the Volga-Oka Interfluve in the Holocene, IIMK RAN, St.Petersburg, pp. 73–165.
  • Nikitin, V.V., 2017, On the Edge of the Stone and Metal Ages. The Middle Volga variant of the Volosovo cultural and historical community. MarGU, Yoshkar-Ola, 765 p. (Archaeology of the Volga Region and the Urals. Materials and Research, iss.10)
  • Rauschenbach, V.M., 1969, “Nikolo-Perevoz II parking lot on Dubna in the Moscow region”, Expeditions of the State Historical Museum. Reports at the session of the Scientific Council of the GIM on February 5–7, 1969, GIM, Moscow, pp. 80–93.
  • Sidorov, V.V., Engovatova, A.V., 1996, “Protovolosovsky stage or culture?”, Tver Archaeological Collection, vol. 2, TGOM, Tver, pp. 164–182.
  • Utkin, A.V., 2020, “Once Again on the Radiocarbon Chronology of Neo-Chalcolithic Burials at the Sakhtysh IIA Site”, Archaeology: History and Prospects. The Ninth Interregional Conference: Collection of Articles, Yaroslavl State Historical, Architectural, and Art Museum-Reserve, Yaroslavl, pp. 211–227. https://doi.org/10.25681/IARAS.2020.978-5-91730-000-9.211–226
  • Tsetlin, Yu.B., 2012, Ancient Ceramics. Theory and Methods of the Historical and Cultural Approach. IA RAN, Moscow, 379 p.
  • Zeng, T.C., Vyazov, L.A., Kim, A. et al., 2023, “Postglacial genomes from foragers across Northern Eurasia reveal prehistoric mobility associated with the spread of the Uralic and Yeniseian languages”, bioRxiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.01.560332
  • Piezonka, H., Kostyleva, E., Zhilin, M.G., Maria, D., Thomas,T., 2013, “Flesh or fish? First results of archaeometric research of prehistoric burials from Sakhtysh IIa, Upper Volga region, Russia”, Documenta Praehistorica, vol.40, pp. 57–73. https://doi.org/10.4312/dp.40.6
Download pdf
up
Search
ISSN: 1814-1692 eISSN: 2782-2842 DOI: 10.31833/UAV