ISSN: 1814-1692 eISSN: 2782-2842 DOI: 10.31833/UAV

Ceramics of Koshkino Site: 60 Years Later

Year: 2025

Pages: 102-112

UDC: 902

Number: Volume 25, issue 1

Type: scientific article

Summary:

The eponymous Neolithic Koshkino V site is a significant monument in the Neolithic historiography both in the forest-steppe Pritobolye and in the Urals and the south of Western Siberia. To obtain new data about the site, one of the authors conducted field surveys and small-scale excavations in 2021–2022 aiming to acquire a relevant ceramic assemblage. This paper consolidates all available published data on the archive (so far lost), and briefly analyzes the Koshkinskiy type of ceramics in the historiographical context. The study also compares the obtained data with the findings of the new fieldwork. The materials under discussion are extremely limited in number; however, the historiographical context renders their examination quite significant. The ceramic items were exposed to typological and technical & technological tests. The excavation operates two well-coordinated radiocarbon dates established through direct dating of the ceramics and the excavated soil. The dates allow to attribute the explored complex to the Late Neolithic. Additionally, the new excavation discovered a group of textile ceramics. There is nothing similar anywhere else in the Pritobolye. Similar complexes in adjacent territories are associated with the Eneolithic to the Early Bronze Age. Since the discussed materials are too scarce for far-reaching conclusions, the authors consider it appropriate to adhere to the Neolithic dating obtained through radiocarbon dating until more representative data on textile ceramics in the region is acquired. The attempt to compare the new materials with the lost archival collection is highly challenging and does not allow establishing direct parallels. Although similarities in the typological composition are clearly present. Overall, the obtained data necessitate more fieldwork in the region under consideration, including reconnaissance surveys.

Keywords:

Neolithic, Pritobolye, Koshkinsky type of the ceramics, technical & technological analysis, textile ceramics

References:

  • Bobrinsky, A.A., 1978, Pottery of Eastern Europe. Sources and methods of study. Nauka, Moscow, 272 p. (In Russ.)
  • Bushueva, T.G., Yurovskaya, V.T., 1962. Report on archaeological surveys in the middle reaches of the Tobol River, conducted in the summer of 1962. (YuUrGGPU Archive) (In Russ.)
  • Vasilyeva, I.N., 2011, “On the technology of making ceramics of the Koksharovsky Hill”, Ural Archaeology Issues, iss. 26, ed. Yu.P. Chemyakin, Magellan, Ekaterinburg, Surgut, pp. 103–124. (In Russ.)
  • Vybornov, A.A., Mosin, V.S., Epimakhov, A.V., 2014, “Chronology of the Uralian Neolithic”, Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia, no. 42 (1), pp. 33–48. (In Russ.)
  • Glushkov, I.G., Glushkova, T.N., 2009, Textile ceramics as a historical source (based on materials from the Bronze Age of Western Siberia). SurGPU, Surgut, 190 p. (In Russ.)
  • Dubovtseva, E.N., 2013, “Ornamental traditions of Ural-West Siberian region (an experience of experimental modeling)”, Vestnik Arheologii, Antropologii i Etnografii, no. 4 (23), pp. 52–58. (In Russ.)
  • Dubovtseva, E.N., 2015, “The use of ochre in ceramic production in the North of Western Siberia”, Samara Journal of Science, no. 4 (4), pp. 37–47. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/snv20154204
  • Yenshin, D.N., 2020, “The Chronological Positions of the Boborykino and Koshkino Complexes in the Lower Ishim River Region (Based on Materials of the Mergen-6 Settlement)”, Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 203–215. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2020-19-7-203-215
  • Zhilin, M.G., Antipina, T.G., Zaretskaya, N.E., Kosinskaya, L.L., Kosintsev, P.A., Ivanova, N.K., Savchenko, S.N., Uspenskaya, O.N., Chirkina, N.M., 2007, Varga 2: Early Neolithic Site in the Middle Transurals: (Experience of Complex Analysis). Rezhevskoy pechatnyy dom, Ekaterinburg, 99 р. (In Russ.)
  • Zhilin, M.G., Kosinskaya, L.L., Ryzhkova, O.V., Savchenko, S.N., Ustinova, E.A., 2020, “Neolithic complex of the site Beregovaya II at the Gorbunovski Peat Bog and problems of the Neolithic of the Trans-Urals”, Camera praehistorica, no. 1 (4), pp. 27–60. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31250/2658-3828-2020-1-27-60
  • Zakh, V.A., 2009, Chronostratigraphy of the Neolithic and Early Metal of the Forest Tobolo-Ishim. Nauka, Novosibirsk, 320 p. (In Russ.)
  • Zdanovich, G.B., 1973, “Bronze Age ceramics of the North Kazakhstan region”, Ural Archaeology Issues, iss. 12, ed. V.F. Gening, UrGU, Sverdlovsk, pp. 21–43. (In Russ.)
  • Klementyeva, T.Y., Pogodin, A.A., 2020, “Stratification of Neolithic ceramic complexes in the Konda River Basin”, Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 216–228. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2020-19-7-216-228
  • Kovaleva, V.T., 1981, “On the Neolithic development schemes of the Forest Trans-Urals”, Ural Archaeology Issues, iss. 15, ed. V.E. Stoyanov, UrGU, Sverdlovsk, pp. 57–61. (In Russ.)
  • Kovaleva, V.T., 1989, The Neolithic of the Middle Urals. UrGU, Sverdlovsk, 80 p. (In Russ.)
  • Kovaleva, V.T., Zyryanova, S.Yu., 1998, Historiography and debatable problems of Boborykin culture, Ural Archaeology Issues, iss. 23, ed. A.V. Shamanaev, UrGU, Ekaterinburg, pp. 162–183. (In Russ.)
  • Kovaleva, V.T., Zyryanova, S.Yu., 2001, “Neolithic cultures of the Middle Urals: genesis, correlation, interaction”, Problems of studying the Neolithic of Western Siberia, ed. V.A. Zakh, IPOS SO RAN, Tyumen, pp. 46–56. (In Russ.)
  • Kovaleva, V.T., Zyryanova, S.Yu., 2008, “Historiography and review of the main monuments of the Koshkin culture of the Middle Trans-Urals”, Ural Archaeology Issues, iss. 25, ed. V.T. Kovaleva, Magellan, Eka­terinburg, Surgut, pp. 73–113. (In Russ.)
  • Kraeva, L.A., 2018, “The pottery of the Sarmatian tribes of Western Kazakhstan and problems of studying ceramics”, Archeology of the Early Nomads of Eurasia, ed. V.N. Myshkin, Book Publishing House, Samara, pp. 140–151. (In Russ.)
  • Krizhevskaya, L.Ya., 1970, “Some data on the Neolithic and Early Bronze Age of the West Siberian forest-Steppe”, Siberia and its neighbors in Ancient Times, ed. V.E. Larichev, Nauka, Novosibirsk, pp. 153–162. (Ancient Siberia. Materials on the history of Siberia. Iss. 3) (In Russ.)
  • Krizhevskaya, L.Ya., 1977, Early Bronze age in the Southern Trans-Urals. LGU, Leningrad, 159 p. (In Russ.)
  • Mosin, V.S., 2016, “Sociocultural Space in the Late Stone Age”, Perm University Herald. History, no. 1 (32), pp. 19–27. (In Russ.)
  • Chirkina, N.M., Besprozvanny, E.M., Molodin, V.I., 2020, “The Complexes with Flat-Bottomed Ceramics in the Neolithic of the Urals and Western Siberia: Current State of the Problems of Study”, Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 34–43. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2020-19-7-34-43
  • Chalaya, L.A., 1973, “Late Neolithic inventory and economy of the Iman-Burluk site”, Archaeological research in Kazakhstan, ed. A.K. Akishev, Nauka, Alma-Ata, pp. 188–203. (In Russ.)
  • Shorin, A.F., Shorina, A.A., 2018, “Radiocarbon dating of the Koksharov Hill Neolithic complexes”, Ural Historical Journal, no. 3 (60), pp. 97–107. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.30759/1728-9718-2018-3(60)-97-107
  • Shorin, A.F., Shorina, A.A. 2019, “Neolithic complexes of the Koksharovsky hill: genesis, stages of development and cultural continuity”, Samara Journal of Science, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 262–268. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/2309-4370-2019-12223
Download pdf
up
Search
ISSN: 1814-1692 eISSN: 2782-2842 DOI: 10.31833/UAV