ISSN: 1814-1692 eISSN: 2782-2842 DOI: 10.31833/UAV

Abrasive Saws of the Middle Urals and Some Aspects of Their Use in Antiquity

Year: 2024

Pages: 111-123

UDC: 903.21+621.93.026.22(470.51/.54)

Number: Volume 24, issue 1

Type: scientific article

BBK: 63.4стд1-410

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31833/uav/2024.24.2.007

Topic: Composition of Eurasian Ecumene. Pioneers and their Time

Authors: Serikov, Yurii B.

Summary:

In the Middle Transurals, stones started to get sawed with abrasive saws in the Neolithic era and was widely used in the Eneolithic. The author studied 129 abrasive saws and 153 items with traces of sawing. They respectively originate from 26 and 22 archaeological sites. Usually there are one or two saws at the site (11 and 5 sites, respectively). But some sites appeared to have dozens of them (Shaitanskoye Lake I – 13; Ust-Vagilsky hill – 19; Yurino IV – 22). They are found both in settlements, sites, and in sanctuaries. Saws are mainly represented by fragments from 1.5 to 24.5 cm long. Moreover, they were broken intentionally. There are few whole saws preserved, usually their length is 10–20 cm. The thickness of the saws ranges from 0.5 to 2.5 cm. Saws up to 0.6 cm thick predominate and constitute 46.3 %. Fifteen saws have two working blades each. 30 abrasive saws are made of fragments of grinding plates and are both one-sided and two-sided. The saws cut into the processed material from 0.2 to 2.5 cm deep. Most often (56.8 %) the items were sawed 0.2 to 0.5 cm deep. The most intense deterioration (3.6 and 4.4 cm) is found in two saws. The working edges of abrasive saws were usually formed by grinding. At the same time, the opposite edge of the saws nearly always remained untreated. The deterioration of stone saws and sawing traces in various objects were analyzed and showed that sawing boiled down to mostly splitting thin blanks used to make knives and arrowheads. There are very rare traces of saws on polished chopping tools such as axes (1) and adzes (5). Abrasive saws were also used to design teeth on comb stamps or grooves on so-called ironings. Besides, saws could be used to cut out patches out of fragments of richly ornamented broken vessels. Saws were made of 8 types of mineral raw materials. It appeared possible to identify mineral raw materials for102 saws. Two-thirds of them are made of slate (41.2 %) and granodiorite (35.3 %). The next most popular material is mica slate which constitutes 11.8 %. The remaining saws are made of sandstone (5 items), quartzite, carbonaceous shale, brown ironstone (2 items each) and quartzite sandstone (1 item). The experiments made it possible to determine the sawing speed and the deterioration rate of the saw material. It is established how long and how much workforce it took to saw. The research managed to compare the efficiency of sawing different types of stone with saws made of materials with different hardness. The experiment results reveal the peculiarities of abrasive sawing of stone. The peculiarities were the methods for securing the blank and securing the saw in the intended cutting line. Sawing with a two-handed saw, as well as using fine-grained abrasive, significantly increased the processing efficiency.

Keywords:

Neolithic, Eneolithic, Middle Transurals, abrasive saws, sawing technique

References:

  • Aleksashenko, N.A. 2004, "Ironings" under the microscope", Kul'tovye pamyatniki gorno-lesnogo Urala (“Cult sites of the mountain-forest Uralsˮ), UrO RAN, Ekaterinburg, pp. 239–254. (In Russ.)
  • Aleksashenko, N.A., Koksharov, S.F., Morozov, V.M. 2017, ”Nizyamy VIII – the settlement of the Bronze Age in the Lower Ob region”, Vestnik ugrovedeniya, no. 3 (30), pp. 99–118. (In Russ.)
  • Anishchenko, I.V., Ahmatova, R.F. 2007, “Some results of the experiment on the abrasive treatment of stoneˮ, Shag v istoricheskuyu nauku. Opyt otechestvennyh i zarubezhnyh modernizacij: materialy regional'noj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii studentov i aspirantov. Ekaterinburg, 19–20 aprelya 2007 g. (“Step into historical science. The experience of domestic and foreign modernization: materials of the regional scientific and practical conference of students and postgraduates. Yekaterinburg, April 19–20, 2007”), UrGPU, Ekaterinburg, pp. 40–44. (In Russ.)
  • Aref'ev, V.A., Ryzhkova, O.V. 2010, “Study of the VI Beregovaya site on the Gorbunovsky peat bog in 1989–1991ˮ, Drevnosti Gorbunovskogo torfyanika. Ohrannye arheologicheskie issledovaniya na Srednem Urale. Vyp. 6 (“Antiquities of the Gorbunovsky peat bog. Safeguard archaeological research in the Middle Urals. Iss. 6”), Bank kul'turnoj informacii, Ekaterinburg, pp. 76–112. (In Russ.)
  • Bers, E.M. 1963, Archaeological sites of Sverdlovsk and its environs. Sverdlovskoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo, Sverdlovsk, 116 p. (In Russ.)
  • Vinogradov, A.S. 2018, “Archaeological research at the settlement of Kolungtotytor 1 in the Nefteyugansk district of KhMAO – Yugra in 2017ˮ, Hanty-Mansijskij avtonomnyj okrug v zerkale proshlogo. Vyp. 16 (“Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug in the mirror of the past. Iss. 16”), TomGU, Tomsk, Hanty-Mansijsk, pp. 295–312. (In Russ.)
  • Ancient Ustie: fortified settlement of Bronse Age in South Ural. Abris, Chelyabinsk, 2013, 482 p. (In Russ.)
  • Kungurova, N.Yu. 2012, “Stone products from the burials of the burial ground of Kurma XI (according to the results of a tracological study)ˮ, in: Goryunova, O.I., Veber, A.V., Novikov, A.G. Burial complexes of Neolithic and Bronze age of Olchon region: burial site Kurma XI, IGU, Irkutsk, pp. 256–270. (In Russ.)
  • Semenov, S.A. 1957, Primitive technique (the experience of studying the oldest tools and products on the traces of work). AN SSSR, Moscow, Leningrad, 240 p. (MIA. № 54). (In Russ.)
  • Serikov, Yu.B. 1974, “The results of the technical surface analysis of stone tools from Neolithic sites Poludenka Iˮ, Sovetskaya arheologiya, no. 1, pp. 135–147. (In Russ.)
  • Serikov, Yu.B. 1978, “On the question of sawing techniques in the Neolithic and Bronze of the Forest Transurals”, Sovetskaya arheologiya, no. 1, pp. 237–242. (In Russ.)
  • Serikov, Yu.B. 2013, Shaitanskoje lake – sacral lake of the Ancient time. NTGSPA, Nizhnii Tagil, 368 p. (In Russ.)
  • Serikov, Yu.B. 2021, “Stone products of prestigious technologies on the sites of the Stone and Bronze Age of the Urals”, Geoarheologiya i arheologicheskaya mineralogiya – 2021. Materialy VIII Vserossijskoj nauchnoj konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem imeni professora V.V. Zajkova, (“Geoarchaeology and Archaeological Mineralogy – 2021. Materials of the VIII All-Russian Scientific Conference with international participation named after Professor V.V. Zaikov”), YuUrGGPU, Miass, Chelyabinsk, pp. 49–55. (In Russ.)
  • Chairkina, N.M. 2005, Eneolithic of the Middle Ural. UrO RAN, Ekaterinburg, 313 p. (In Russ.)
  • Shahnovich, M.M., Tarasov, A.Yu. 2000, “Saws and sawing: some observations on aspects of technology and features of existence in the Stone Age of Kareliaˮ, Tverskoj arheologicheskij sbornik (“Tver archaeological collection of articles”), vol. 4, Tverskoj ob”edinennyj gosudarstvennyj muzej, Tver,, pp. 151–160. (In Russ.)
Download pdf
up
Search
ISSN: 1814-1692 eISSN: 2782-2842 DOI: 10.31833/UAV