Ufa Archaeological Herald

The article substantiates why it is important to commit to a number of characteristics to process and describe fine ceramics from the Modern and Contemporary cultural layers and introduce these ceramics for scientific use. Such characteristics imply the material of products (porcelain, faience, semi-faience, maiolica), morphology and function (cups, saucers, plates, dishes, etc.), decor, including decoration techniques (painting, printing, decal, etc.), manufacturers’ stamps including techniques of their application (printing, decal, stamp, stencil, etc.). Archaeologists and museum experts give specific examples that illustrate what information can be extracted from a detailed description of these parameters in the archaeological porcelain and faience. This information can be used for interpretation of both the finds themselves and the cultural layer where they were discovered. The study offers separate description of specifics and significance for individual and mass finds. Individual finds in the first place serve for historical and cultural affiliation and chronology of an archaeological heritage object. Therefore, it is suggested to describe such finds committing to the characteristics that make it possible to determine the place and period of origin of the artifacts themselves as accurately as possible. Whereas mass finds are severely destroyed objects not subject to restoration. Some of them might be left behind at the site of archaeological excavations, and irretrievably lost as a consequence. That is why the research suggests options for setting out their most important historical, cultural and scientific parameters in statistic tables. The study raises problematic methodological issues regarding the possible interpretation of the statistical data obtained.

archaeological porcelain, archaeological faience, modern archeology, urban archaeology, individual finds, mass finds, fine ceramics

• Andreeva, L.V. 1975, Soviet porcelain. 1920–1930s. Soviet Artist, Moscow, 340 p. (In Russ.)
• Bakhshiev, I.I., Grigoriev, N.N. 2018, “Fine ceramics from the cultural layer of Ufa”, Theory and practice of archaeological research, no. 4 (24), pp. 147–161. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.14258/tpai(2018)4(24).-13  
• Bernts, V.A., Sabirov, T.R. 2020, “Faience tableware with stamps from the cultural layer of the Izhevsk Factory settlement”, Aktual’nye problemy izucheniya istoricheskih gorodov-zavodov: Materialy Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Izhevsk, 22–23 sentyabrya 2020 g. (“Actual problems of studying historical factory towns: Materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical conference. Izhevsk, September 22–23, 2020”), UFIC UrO RAN, Izhevsk, pp. 96–114. (In Russ.)
• Biryukov, V.P. 1930, “From the history of porcelain and faience business in Priisetye”, Isetsko-Pyshminskij kraj: sbornik kraevedcheskih statej. Vyp. 1 (“Isetsko-Pyshminsky Krai: collection of local history articles. Iss. 1”), Dalmatian Society of Local Lore, Shadrinsk, pp. 41–49. (In Russ.)
• Bubnova, E.A. 1973, Old Russian faience. Iskusstvo, Moscow, 188 p. (In Russ.)
• Galukhin, L.L., Volodeeva, Yu.S., Stolbov, V.I., Frolov, I.V. 2020, “Porcelain products from the excavations of the Balandin estate in Yeniseisk”, Trudy VI (XXII) Vserossijskogo arheologicheskogo s”ezda v Samare. Samara, 01–02 oktyabrya 2020 g. T. III (“Trudy VI (XXII) The All-Russian Archaeological Congress in Samara. Samara, October 01–02, 2020. Vol. III”), SGSPU, Samara, pp. 45–47. (In Russ.)
• The city of Yekaterinburg: a collection of historical and statistical information about the city, with an address index and with the addition of some information about the Yekaterinburg district: with plans of Yekaterinburg and its pasture and 10 tables of draw- ings. Edition of the Yekaterinburg mayor I.I. Simanov, Yekaterinburg, 1889, 1051 p. (In Russ.)
• Dulkina, T.I. 2003, Hallmarks of Russian porcelain and faience. 1750–1960. Publishing house of Kasatkina, Moscow, 430 p. (In Russ.)
• Evshin, A.S. 2019, “Morphological description of the archaeological collection of porcelain and faience based on the material of security works on Herzen Street, 28 in Kirov”, Obshchestvo. Nauka. Innovacii (NPK-2019): sbornik statej XIX Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. T. 3 (“Society. Science. Innovations (NPK-2019): collection of articles of the XIX All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference. Vol. 3”), VyatGU, Kirov, pp. 242–254. (In Russ.)
• Zagvazdina, Ya.G. 2022, “Porcelain and faience from the excavations of Neudachin’s estate in Tobolsk”, Theory and practice of archaeological research, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 84–104. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.14258/tpai(2022)34(2).-06 
• Koval, V.Yu. 2016, Primary fixation of mass ceramic material (on monuments of the Middle Ages and Early Iron Age of the forest zone of Eastern Europe). IA RAN, Moscow, 128 p. (In Russ.) 
• Matveev, A.V., Anoshko, O.M., Siryushova, N.F. 2011, “Old porcelaine and faience from a cultural layer of Tobolsk”, Vestnik arheologii, antropologii i etnografii, no. 2 (15), pp. 116–124. (In Russ.)
• Mergeneva, K.N. 2019, “Analysis of the collection of porcelain and faience products from the excavation of urban estates on Kuibyshev St., 21–23 of Kurgan city”, LI Uralo-Povolzhskaya arheologicheskaya studencheskaya konferenciya: materialy Vserossijskoj (s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem) konferencii studentov, aspirantov i molodyh uchenyh (“LI Ural-Volga Archaeological Student Conference: materials of the All-Russian (with international participation) conference of students, postgraduates and young scientists”), KGU, Kurgan, pp. 203–206. (In Russ.)
• Mergeneva, K.N. 2022, “Archeology of the early Soviet period: setting the problem in the context of urban excavations in Kurgan”, LIV Uralo-Povolzhskaya arheologicheskaya studencheskaya konferenciya: Materialy Vserossijskoj (s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem) arheologicheskoj studencheskoj konferencii (“LIV Ural-Volga Archaeological Student Conference: Proceedings of the All-Russian (with international participation) archaeological student Conference”), IP Sorokin R.V., Astrakhan, pp. 255–257. (In Russ.)
• Novikov, I.K., Poryvaev, A.S., Mergeneva, K.N. 2020, “To the problem of interpretation of mass materials of Modern and Contemporary times (based on the materials of the cultural layer of the Kurgan)”, Geoarheologiya i arheologicheskaya mineralogiya. Materialy VII Vserossijskoj nauchnoj konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem imeni V.V. Zajkova. T. 7 (“Geoarchaeology and archaeological mineralogy. Materials of the VII All-Russian Scientific Conference with international participation named after V.V. Zaik- ov. Vol. 7”), YUrGGPU, Miass, Chelyabinsk, pp. 29–32 (In Russ.)
• Noskova, L. 1987, “Ural faience from the collection of the Perm Museum of Local Lore”, Evening Perm, no. 83, p. 3. (In Russ.)
• Panchenko, K.I. 2015, “Statistical processing of ceramics and reliability of the received data (some problems)”, Sovremennye podhody k izucheniyu drevnej keramiki v arheologii. Mezhdunarodnyj simpozium (29–31 oktyabrya 2013 g., Moskva) (“Recent approaches to ancient ceramics in archaeology. International Symposium (October 29–31, 2013, Moscow)”), IA RAN, Moscow, pp. 87–95. (In Russ.)
• Perevozchikova, S.A. 2023,   “Earthenware from the quarters in Krasnaya street of the “Izhevsk plant” settlement”, Proceedings of the Komi Scientific Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The series “History and Philology”, no. 5 (63), pp. 56–66. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.19110/1994-5655-2023-5-56-66 
• Permina, D.A. 2022, “Collection of porcelain and faience from the cultural layer of the archaeological7036 settlement of the Bala tract 1”, LIV Uralo-Povolzhskaya arheologicheskaya studencheskaya konferenciya: Materialy Vserossijskoj (s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem) arheologicheskoj studencheskoj konferencii (“LIV Ural-Volga Archaeological Student Conference: Proceedings of the All-Russian (with international participation) archaeological student Conference”), IP Sorokin R.V., Astrakhan, pp. 261–266. (In Russ.)
• Rosenberg,A. 1980, “Drawing on an old plate”, Zvezda, no. 275, p. 4. (In Russ.)
• Savelev, N.S., Saveleva,A.G., Nikolaev, S.Yu. 2020, “Artifacts of the Modern Era from Pervomaisky-1 Site (Southern Trans-Urals): Typology, Chronology and Ethnocultural Affiliation of the Archaeological Monument Revisited”, Oriental Studies, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 843–865. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2020-50-4-843-865 
• Saltykov, A.B. 1952, Russian ceramics: a guide to the definition of monuments of material culture of the XVIII – early XX century. Goskultprosvetizdat, Moscow, 272 p. (In Russ.)
• Sametskaya, E.B. 2004, Soviet propaganda porcelain: a reference guide. Collector’s Books, Media Inc., Moscow, 480 p. (In Russ.)
• Saukov, G.N., Mergeneva, K.N. 2020, “Faience tableware of Ural manufacturers of the XIX – early XX century from the excavation of the city estate (Kurgan, Kuibyshev str., 21): information possibilities of a material source”, Vserossijskaya nauchnaya konferenciya «Rol’veshchestvennyh istochnikov v informacionnom obespechenii istoricheskoj nauki». Kurgan, 20–21 marta 2020 g. (“All-Russian scientific conference “The role of material sources in the information support of historical science”. Kurgan, March 20-21, 2020”), INION RAN, Moscow, pp. 273–290. (In Russ.)
• Serebrennikov, N.N. 1924, “About the faience factory in the village of Sretensky, Perm county”, Permskij kraevedcheskij sbornik. Vyp. 1 (“The Perm collection of local lore. Iss. 1”), Society for the study of the Northern Territory at Perm University, Perm, pp. 92–96. (In Russ.)
• Stolbov, V.I. 2021, “Ceramic tableware from the excavations of the Balandin estate in Yeniseisk (based on the material of the finds of 2016)”, Kul’tura russkih v arheologicheskih issledovaniyah: arheologiya Seve- ra Rossii. V 2 t. T. 2 (“Culture of Russians in archaeological research: archeology of the North of Russia. In 2 vols. Vol. 2”), ANO “Institute of Archaeology of the North”, Omsk, Surgut, pp. 201–204. (In Russ.)
• Tataurova, L.V., Tataurov, F.S. 2010, “The possibilities of “archaeological” porcelain as a source”, Kul’tura kak sistema v istoricheskom kontekste: Opyt Zapadno-Sibirskih arheologo-etnograficheskih soveshchanij. Materialy XV Mezhdunarodnoj Zapadno-Sibirskoj arheologo-etnograficheskoj konferencii (“Culture as a system in a historical context: The experience of West Siberian archaeological and ethnographic meetings. Proceedings of the XV International West Siberian Archaeological and Ethnographic Conference”), Agraf-Press, Tomsk, pp. 285–288. (In Russ.)
• Tataurov, S.F., Tataurov, F.S. 2019, “Porcelain and Faience in the Cultural Layer of the Town of Tara”, Bylye Gody, no. 54 (4), pp. 1418–1428. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.13187/bg.2019.4.1418 
• Tataurov, F.S. 2023, “Chinese porcelain from Russian archeological sites of the Omsk Irtysh region of the 17^th – 18^th centuries in the archaeological and historical context of Western Siberia”, Theory and practice of archaeological research, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 147–161. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.14258/tpai(2023)35(3).-10 
• Tikhomirova, M.N., Tikhomirov, K.N. 2020, “On the question of attribution of archaeological pottery from fine ceramics of the New age”, Trudy VI (XXII) Vserossijskogo arheologicheskogo s”ezda v Samare. Samara, 01–02 oktyabrya 2020 g. T. III (“Trudy VI (XXII) The All-Russian Archaeological Congress in Samara. Samara, October 01–02, 2020. Vol. III”), SGSPU, Samara, pp. 62–63. (In Russ.)
• Index of works of domestic industry at the first Moscow exhibition in 1831. S. Selivanovsky Printing House, Moscow, 1831, 136 p. (In Russ.)
• Index of the V Moscow exhibition of Russian manufactured works. 1865. Lazarevsky Printing House, Moscow, 1865, 200 p. (In Russ.)
• Tsurenko, I.G., Nasonova, I.S., Nasonov, S.M. 2010, Russian faience and porcelain. The Empire of the Kuznetsovs and Konakovo. From a private collection. Among collectors, Moscow, 510 p. (In Russ.)
• Cherny, N.V. 1970, Verbilok porcelain: from the history of Russian and Soviet porcelain. Fine Arts, Moscow, 296 p. (In Russ.)
• Yanchenko, E.S. 2016, “Porcelain and faience products from the cultural layer of Kurgan on the example of the excavation of estates at the corner of Sovetskaya and Pichugina streets”, Arheologiya Srednego Pritobol’ya i sopredel’nyh territorij: Materialy mezhregional’nogo kruglogo stola, posvyashchennogo 50-letiyu Kurganskoj arheologicheskoj ekspedicii (“Archeology of the Middle Tributary and adjacent territories: Materials of the interregional round table dedicated to the 50^th anniversary of the Kurgan archaeological expedition”), KGU, Kurgan, pp. 119–123. (In Russ.)