Ufa Archaeological Herald

From the ancient times and until the 2–3 centuries AC the leading part in the ethnocultural history of the Middle Kama region was played by local populations of the Pyany Bor culture. In the 3rd century AC their role started changing due to active interactions between the peoples of the forest-steppe Cis-Urals and the Late Sarmatians from the Southern Ural steppes. Some cultural shifts in the region, which also happened in the 3rd – 5th centuries AC, can be considered as a result of Western (Goths and Slavic) infusions. During this period members of the Pyany Bor cultural community began to disseminate expanding their settlement area. Discoveries of their sites along small tributaries of the Kama river indicate the main directions of migrations: to the north, north-east and north-west. While slowly abandoning territories near the Ik and Syun rivers, peoples were activity exploring the right bank of the lower Belaya river and the areas in the middle reaches of the Bystry Tanyp river. Migrations of the late Pyany Bor culture bearers show the patterns of “selective” colonization. Archaeological and anthropological data obtained during the excavations of the two newly discovered necropolises of the Mazunino type – Boyarsky and Dubrovsky – are of particular interest in the context of studying the internal migrations of the Cheganda culture. These two necropolises are not identical from the point of craniology; however both of them contain skulls with the features typical for the representatives of the Kara-Abyz and Pyany Bor cultures. While the samples from Boyarsky necropolis are heterogeneous, bone remains from the cemetery of Dubrovsky are more unified and reflect characteristics of some specific forest and forest-steppe Cis-Urals populations. Blank sports on the anthropological map of the Middle Kama region don’t allow to reconstruct the exact migration paths of the Cheganda peoples. However, it could be noted that craniological samples from both Boyarsky and Dubrovsky necropolises refer to the “western cluster” of the Mazunino culture and have much in common with the Cheganda culture. Some features of the Cheganda culture bearers are also of an evident similarity with those of the Azelin culture. Though female samples of the Mazunino and
Azelin type have in fact no differences, male samples differ significantly. Probably, male populations of both cultures were influenced by foreign groups with distinctive anthropological characteristics. As for the anthropological similarities between the Mazunino and the Kara-Abyz peoples, they are rather the consequence of a common substrate, than the direct participation of Kara-Abyz descendants in the formation of Mazunino culture. This can be proved by the fact that samples from late Kara-Abyz groups don’t converge with samples from Mazunino groups, in contrast to ones from the early Kara-Abyz groups.

Kama region, Pyany Bor cultural-historical community, Mazunino culture/stage, migrations

• Ageev, B.B. 1992, The Pyany Bor culture. BNC UrO RAN, Ufa, 140 p. (In Russ.)
• Akimova, M.S. 1968, Anthropology of ancient people in the Pre-Urals area. Nauka, Moscow, 120 p. (In Russ.)
• Alekseev, V.P. 1969, Origin of the peoples of Eastern Europe (Craniological research). Nauka, Moscow, 324 p. (In Russ.)
• Bugrov, D.G. 1994, “Objects with champlevé from the Lower Kama region”, Istoriko-archeologicheskoe izuchenie Povolzhya (“Historical and archaeological study of the Volga region”), YoshkarOla, pp. 33–39. (In Russ.)
• Bugrov, D.G. 2006, Settlements of the Pyany Bor Culture in the Ik-Belaya interfluve. Dissertation abstract … Candidate of Historical Sciences. Kazan, 20 p. (In Russ.)
• Bugrov, D.G., Asylgarayeva, G.S. 2020, “Animals in the burial rite of the Lower Kama region populations in the first half of the 1st millennium AD (based on the assemblages from Gulyukovo necropolis)”, The Volga River Region Archaeology, no.1, pp. 146–166. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24852/pa2020.1.31.146.166
• Gening, V.F. 1967, “Mazunino culture in the Middle Kama region”, Pamyatniki mazuninskoy kultury, (“Archaeological sites of the Mazunino culture”), USU, Izhevsk, Sverdlovsk, pp. 7–84. (In Russ.)
• Gening, V.F. 1970, History of the Udmurt Kama region in the Pyany Bor stage. Part 1. Cheganda culture (3rd century BC – 2nd century AD). USU, UdmNII IELYa, Sverdlovsk, Izhevsk, pp. 3–224. (In Russ.)
• Gening, V.F. 1972, “Southern Cis-Urals in the 3–7 centuries AD (The problem of ethnos and its origin)”, Problemy archeologii i drevney istorii ugrov. Sbornik statey Sovetskih i Vengerskih Archeologov (“Problems of archeology and ancient history of Ugrians. А collection of papers written by Soviet and Hungarian archaeologists”), Nauka, Moscow, pp. 221–295. (In Russ.)
• Goldina, E.V., Goldina, R.D. 2010, «Distant Import» in the Kama region – peculiarities of interactions between the peoples of Eurasia (8th century BC – 9th century AD)”, Goldina E.V. Busy mogilnikov nevolinskoy kultury (konets 4 – 9vv.) (in book “Goldina E.V. Beads from the Nevolino culture necropolises (the end of the 4th – 9th centuries)”), Izhevsk, pp. 156–247. (In Russ.)
• Goldina, R.D. 2006, “On the interaction models of various ethnic groups of the Kama region during the migration period”, Vzaimodeystvie Narodov Evrazii v Epohu Velikogo pereseleniya narodov (“Interactions between peoples of Eurasia during the migration period”), Izhevsk, pp. 281–304. (In Russ.)
• Goldina, R.D. 2019, “Fibulae from Tarasovsky necropolis in the Middle Kama region (3–5 centuries AD)”, Stratum Plus, no. 4, pp. 169–186. (In Russ.)
• Goldina, R.D. 2020, Dissemination of FinnoPermyaks in the Middle Kama region in the 8th century BC – 2nd century AD, Yearbook of Finno-Ugric Studies, vol. 14, iss. 2, pp. 304–323. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.35634/2224-9443-2020-14-2-304-323
• Goldina, R.D., Bernts, V.A. 2010, Turaevsky I necropolis – a unique settlement of the migration period in the Middle Kama region (barrow less graves). Izhevsk, 499 p. (In Russ.)
• Goldina, R.D., Bernts, V.A. 2016, “Chronology of male burials of Tarasovsky necropolis dated to the 3th – 5th centuries AD”,The Volga River Region Archaeology, no. 3 (17), pp.17–58. (In Russ.)
• Goldina, R.D., Leshchinskaya, N.A. 2018, “About the Pyany Bor cultural and historical community”, Archeology of the Eurasian steppes, no. 1, pp. 17–55. (In Russ.)
• Efimova, S.G. 1981, “To the craniology of the Early Iron Age of Volga-Kama region”, Voprosy antropologii, vol. 67, pp. 64–73. (In Russ.)
• Krasnoperov, A.A. 2018a, “Anachronisms in funeral inventory. Items of the Pyany Bor culture in the Mazunino burials: the change of eras in the Kama region”, Archeology of the Eurasian steppes, no. 1, pp. 56–86. (In Russ.)
• Krasnoperov, A.A. 2018b, “Azelin culture: moving eastwards. Items of Azelin type found to the east of the primary area”, Archeology of the Eurasian steppes, no. 1, pp.130–177. (In Russ.)
• Kufterin, V.V., Vorobyova, S.L. 2019, “To the paleodemography of the Pyany Bor culture”, The Volga River Region Archaeology, no.1 (27), pp. 164–179. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24852/2019.1.27.164.179
• Kufterin, V.V. 2020, “Craniology of NovoSasykul necropolis”, Perm University Herald. History, vol.48, iss. 1, pp. 82–96. (In Russ.)
• Malashev, V.Y. 2014, “Some aspects of contacts of the Late Sarmatians from the South Ural steppes with the populations from the forest-steppe zones of the Volga and Cis-Ural regions”, Ufa Archaeological Herald, vol. 14, pp. 130–140. (In Russ.)
• Mingalev, V.V., Pereskokov, M.L. 2021, “Fortification of settlements with multiple hillforts in the Perm Cis-Urals during the migration period: theory and interpretations”, The Volga River Region Archaeology, no.1 (35), pp. 155–169. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24852/pa2021.1.35.155.169
• Nechvaloda, A.I. 2012, “New craniological materials of Kara-Abyz culture from Kara-Abyz II burial ground”, Etnos. Obshchestvo. Civilizaciya: III Kuzeevskie chteniya. Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii (g. Ufa, 28 sentyabrya 2012 g.) (“Ethnos. Society. Civilization: III Kuzeev’s readings. Materials of the international scientific conference (Ufa, 28 September 2012)”), Ufimskij poligrafkombinat, Ufa, pp. 249−251. (In Russ.)
• Nechvaloda, A.I., Vorobyova, S.L. 2018, “Male and female burials of the representatives of the KaraAbyz culture according to the materials found at the Okhlebinino burial site: anthropological evidence and burial clothing“, Muzhskoj i zhenskij mir v otrazhe- nii arheologii: Materialy Vserossijskoj s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem nauchnoj konferencii (g. Ufa, 19–22 noyabrya 2018 g.) (“Male and female world in the reflection of archeology: Proceedings of the All-Russian scientific conference with international participation (Ufa, November 19–22, 2018)”), IIYaL UFIC RAN, Ufa, pp. 152–170. (In Russ.)
• Ovsyannikov, V.V. 2009, “On the identification of zones of active interaction between settled and nomadic populations of Trans-Urals during the Savromato-Sarmatian era”, Ufa Archaeological Herald, vol. 9, pp. 144–156. (In Russ.)
• Ovsyannikov, V.V., Savelev, N.S., Akbulatov, I.M., Vasiliev, V.N. 2007, Shipovo necropolis in the forest-steppe Cis-Urals. Gilem, Ufa, 166 p. (In Russ.)
• Ostanina, T.I. 1997, Population of the Middle Kama region in the 3rd – 5th centuries. UIIYaL UrO RAN, Izhevsk, 326 p. (In Russ.)
• Pshenichnyuk, A.H. 1987, “Studies of the Early Iron Age”, Voprosy drevney i srednevekovoy istorii Yuzhnogo Urala (“Problems of ancient and medieval history of the Southern Urals”), BFAN SSSR, Ufa, pp. 67–76. (In Russ.)
• Rykushina, G.V., Tikhonov, A.G. 2000, “Preliminary report about anthropological materials from Mazunino culture burial site Pokrovka”, Narody Rossii: ot proshlogo k nastoyashchemu. Antropologiya (“Peoples of Russia: from past to present. Anthropology”), vol. 2, Stary sad, Moscow, pp.170–188. (In Russ.)
• Sabirova, T.M. 2019, Fibulae of the Middle Kama region: first half of the 1st millennium AD. UdmFIC UrO RAN, Izhevsk, 248 p. (In Russ.)
• Stavitsky, V.V. 2015, “To the question of chronology of the burials with fibulae from Novo-Sasykul’ necropolis”, Ufa Archaeological Herald, vol.15, pp. 111–116. (In Russ.)
• Sungatov, F.A., Garustovich, G.N., Yusupov, R.M. 2004, Cis-Urals Region during the Great Migration (Staraya Myshta barrow-ground necropolis). Ufimskij poligrafkombinat, Ufa, 172 p.(In Russ.)
• Sungatov, F.A., Garustovich, G.N., Yusupov, R.M. 2004, Cis-Urals during the migration period (StaroMushtinsky barrow necropolis). IIYaL UNC RAN, Ufa, 172 p. (In Russ.)
• Fattakhov, R.M. 1978, “Anthropological charac- teristic of population of Udmurt Kama region in the middle of the 1st millennium AD”, Problemy etnografii i etnicheskoj antropologii (“Problems of Ethnography and Ethnical Anthropology”), Nauka, Moscow, pp. 206–215. (In Russ.)
• Fattakhov, R.M. 1980, “New anthropological materials from Middle and Lower Kama region”, Issledovaniya po paleoantropologii i kraniologii SSSR (“Research on paleoanthropology and craniology of the USSR”), vol. 36, Nauka, Leningrad, pp. 130–138. (In Russ.)
• Fattakhov, R.M. 1981, “Craniological study of the materials from Staryy Chekmak burial site”, Ob istoricheskih pamyatnikah po dolinam Kamy i Beloj (“On the historical sites in Kama and Belaya river valleys”), IYaLI KFAN SSSR, Kazan, pp. 94–109. (In Russ.)
• Khokhlov, A.A., Gazimzyanov, I.R., Stashenkov, D.A. 2022, “On the spread of the tradition of artificial deformation of the scull in the northern part of the Volga-Ural region (the Bronze and Early Iron Ages)”, The Volga River Region Archaeology, no.1 (39), pp. 204–220. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24852/pa2022.1.39.204.220
• Chernykh, E.M., Khairullina, O.F. 2018, “Boyarsky («Aray») necropolis – a newly discovered site of the migration period in the Middle Kama region”, Archaeology of the Eurasian Steppes, no.1, pp. 86–106. (In Russ.)
• Chernykh, E.M., Khairullina, O.F. 2020, “Arrowheads from the 3rd – 5th century burials of the Boyarsky («Aray») necropolis in the Middle Kama region”, Veshch v kontekste pogrebalnogo obryada (“Items in the burial rite context”), RGGU, Moscow, pp. 203–216. (In Russ.)
• Shirobokov, I.G, Chernikh, E.M. 2016, “Physical anthropology data on the origin of the Kama region population of the middle of the 1st millennium AD (according to the finds from Boyarskiy «Aray» necropolis)”, Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series History and Philology, vol. 26, iss.1, pp. 25–34. (In Russ.)
• Shirobokov, I.G., Chernykh, E.M., Nechvaloda, A.I. 2018, “Anthropological characteristic of skeletal remains from excavation of Dubrovsky necropolis”, Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series History and Philology, vol. 28, iss. 4, pp. 499–512. (In Russ.)
• Rightmire,G.P. 1969, “On the computation of Mahalanobis’ generalized distance (D2)”, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 30, pp. 157–160.