Ufa Archaeological Herald

From 6th through early 2nd century the Fore-Tian-Shan region was occupied by an authentic Saka Culture. It had close ethnical and cultural associations with the contemporary population of Eastern Kazakhstan. They left specific Bukon Culture-type monuments. Besides, the Tian-Shan Sakas made a significant contribution to Kamenskaya Culture in forest-steppe Altai (Ob & Irtysh Interfluve). They maintained regular connections. However, in the 4th century BC the Pazyryk political union from the mountain Altai became stronger and started sustainably expanding to the south – Eastern Kazakhstan, northern Xinjiang and the Mongolian Altai Mountains. This leads to broken connection between the Sakas of the Tian-Shan region and their kin from the forest-steppe Altai. It results in the lost control over Bukon Cultue type tribes in Eastern Kazakhstan. It causes reduced influence in adjacent areas of Xinjiang. Pazyryk and Kara-Koba Culture people were migrating in the Eastern Kazakhstan at the turn of 4th–3rd centuries BC. This migration causes a hybrid Kula-Zhurga Culture. Bearers of this culture were a part of the Pazyryk political union. Obviously, these processes were accompanied by large military conflicts between the Fore-Tian-Shan Sakas and the Pazyrykets’. It resulted in the Sakas losing control over a number of territories in the North-East of their union – North-East Zhetysu. This territory is evident with family burials with Pazyryk (Songshugoukou) and Kula-Zhurga (Tausamaly) appearance. This directly proves the migration and relatively long stay of newly arrived northern populations. Long-standing rivals against the Pazyryks, regular and large conflicts with Hellenic states weaken the political union of the Tian-Shan Sakas. Therefore, in around 165 BC they were defeated by Yuezhi that had come from the East. The majority of the Sakas was pushed to the southern Central Asia. Their this nation took part in the so-called ‘nomad invasion’ of Greco-Bactria.

Early Iron Age, Saka period, Saka culture of Tian Shan, migrations, ethnic and cultural contacts

• Akishev,A.K. 1984, Art and Mythology of the Saka peoples. Nauka, Alma-Ata, 176p. (In Russ.)
• Batsukh, D., Erdene-Diamond, N. 2017, “Weapons of Mongol Altai Pazyryk Warriors”, Studia Ar- chaeologica, vol.XXXVI, fasc.10, Ulaanbaatar, pp. 139–168. (In Mongolian)
• Beisenov, A.Z. 1996, “Korgantass burials dated to the end of the 1st millenium BC in Central Kazakhstan and the problem of studying intra-grave head altars”, 100 let gunnskoy arkheologii. Nomadizm: proshloe, nastoyashchee v globalnom kontekste i istoricheskoy perspektive. Gunnskiy fenomen. Ch. I. Mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya (12–19 avgusta 1996 g., UlanUde). Tezisy dokladov (“100 Years of Hunnic Archeology. Nomadism: Past, Present in a Global Context and Historical Perspective. The Hunnish Phenomenon. PartI. International Conference (August 12–19, 1996, Ulan-Ude). Abstracts of reports”), Oleon, Ulan-Ude, pp. 89–94. (In Russ.)
• Beisenov, A.Z., Ismagilova, O.A., Kitov, E.P., Kotova,A.O. 2015, Population of Central Kazakhstan in the 1st millennium BC. A.H. Margulan Institute of Archaeology, Almaty, 188 p. (In Russ.)
• Bernard, P., Abdullaev, K. 1997, “Nomads on Border of Bactria (to the issue of ethnic and cultural identification)”, Russian Archaeology, no.1, pp. 68–86. (In Russ.)
• Bokovenko, N.A., Zadneprovsky, Yu.A. 1992, “Early Nomads of East Kazakhstan”, Arkheologiya SSSR. Stepnaya polosa Aziatskoy chasti SSSR v skifosarmatskoe vremya (“Archaeology of USSR. Steppe Strip of Asian Part of USSR during Scythian-Sarma- tian Time”), Nauka, Moscow, pp. 140–149. (In Russ.)
• Zadneprovsky, Y.A. 1971, “On Ethnicity of Monuments of Nomads of Semirechye during Usun Period, 2nd Century BC – 5th Century AD”, Strany i narody Vostoka. T. X. Srednyaya i Centralnaya Aziya. Geografiya, etnografiya, istoriya (“Countries and Peoples of East. Vol.X. Middle and Central Asia. Geography, Ethnography, History”), Nauka, Moscow, pp. 27–36. (In Russ.)
• Zadneprovsky, Y.A. 2007, “Migration Path of Yuezhi according to New Archaeological Data”, Zadneprovskiy Yu.A. Drevnie nomady Centralnoy Azii (“Zadneprovsky Y.A. Ancient Nomads of Central Asia”), IIMK RAN, St.Petersburg, pp. 74–79. (In Russ.)
• Ivanov, S.S. 2012, “Military-Political Relations of the Saks from Semirechye and Tien Shan with GrecoBactria”, Bilim zhana tarbiya, no. 1 (13), pp. 35–38. (In Russ.)
• Ivanov, S.S. 2013, “The campaign of Seleucid general Demodamas against Saka of Semirechie and Tien-Shan region”, Bulletin of KSU I. Arabaev, Spe- cial issue, part 2, pp. 71–74. (In Russ.)
• Ivanov, S.S. 2014, “Military-Political Relations of Alexander the Great and Saks of SemirechenskTianshan Region”, Kyrgyzskij i Karahanidskij kaganaty: neizgladimye sledy. Sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii (“Kyrgyz and Karakhanid Kaganates: Indelible Traces. Proceedings of the International scientific conference”), Maxprint, Bishkek, pp. 93–96. (In Russ.)
• Ivanov, S.S. 2019а, “The Culture of Saka Tribes of Tien Shan Region: Present State and General Prob- lems of Research”, Scripta antiqua. Ancient History, Philology, Arts and Material Culture, vol. 7, pp. 11–23. (In Russ.)
• Ivanov, S.S. 2019b, “The distinction of local vari- ations of Saka culture of Tien Shan region”, SCYTHICA et SARMATIA, MAKS Press, Moscow, pp. 71–78. (In Russ.)
• Kitov, E.P., Tur, S.S., Ivanov, S.S. 2019, The paleoanthropology of Saka cultures of Tien Shan region (VIII – early half of II centuries BC). Hikari, Almaty, 300 p. (In Russ.)
• Kovalev, A.A. 1999, “On relations between populations in the 5th - 3rd centuries BC”, Itogi izucheniya skifskoy epokhi Altaya i sopredelnykh territoriy (“Results of Studying Scythian Epoch of Altai and Adjacent Territories”), AltGU, Barnaul, pp.75–82. (In Russ.)
• Kushaev, G.A. 1968, “Early Burials of Alakul Depression”, Novoe v arkheologii Kazakhstana (“New in Archeology of Kazakhstan”), Nauka, Alma-Ata, pp. 135–145. (In Russ.)
• Litvinsky, B.A. 1972, Ancient Nomads of the “Roofs of the World”. Nauka, Moscow, 270 p. (In Russ.)
• Mogilnikov, V.A. 1997, Population of the Upper Ob region in the middle - second half of the 1st millenium BC, IA RAN, Moscow, 195 p. (In Russ.)
• Mu, J. 2020, “The sites of Pazyryk Culture in Xin- jian”, Theory and practice of archaeological research, no. 2 (30), pp. 138–147. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.14258/tpai(2020)2(30).-10
• Mu, J. 2022, “Pazyryk burial mounds with ce- ramic vessels from Songshugou grave field (Xinjiang, China)”, Evraziya v eneolite – rannem srednevekov’e (innovacii, kontakty, translyacii idej i tekhnologij): Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii, posvyashchennoj 120-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya vydayushchegosya issledovatelya drevnostej Yuzhnoj Sibiri i Central’noj Azii Mihaila Petrovicha Gryaznova (1902–1984) (“Eurasia from the Aeneolithic (Chalcolithic) Era to the Early Middle Ages (Innovations, Contacts, Transmission of Ideas and Technologies): Proceedings of the International conference dedicated to the 120th anniversary of the outstanding researcher of Southern Siberian and Central Asian antiquities Mikhail Petrovich Gryaznov (1902–1984)”), IIMK RAN, St.Petersburg, pp. 226–228. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31600/978-5-6047952-5-5.226-228
• Samashev, Z.S. 1987, “Monuments of the Kulazhurginsky type”, Arkheologicheskie pamyatniki v zone zatopleniya Shulbinskoy GES (“Archaeological monuments in the zone of flooding of the Shulbinskaya HPP”), Nauka, Alma-Ata, pp. 95–114. (In Russ.)
• Samashev, Z.S. 2011, Berel. Tajmas, Almaty, 236 p. (In Russ.)
• Samashev, Z.S. 2017, “Kazakh Altai in the I millennium BC”, Kazakhstan v sakskuyu epohu (“Kazakhstan in the Saka epoch”), A.X.Margulan Institute of Archaeology, Almaty, pp. 101–156. (In Russ.)
• Chernikov,S.S. 1951, “Report on the works of the East Kazakhstan expedition in 1948”, Izvestiya AN KazSSR. Seriya arkheologicheskaya (“Izvestiya AN KazSSR. Archaeological Series”), iss. 3, no. 108, pp. 64–81. (In Russ.)
• Chernikov,S.S. 1959, “Works of the East Ka- zakhstan archaeological expedition in 1956”, KSI- IMK, vol. 73, pp. 99–106. (In Russ.)
• Chernikov,S.S. 1975, “To the question of chron- ological periods during the era of early nomads (according to the archaeological materials from Eastern Kazakhstan)”, Pervobytnaya arkheologiya Sibiri (“Primitive Archaeology of Siberia”), Nauka, Leningrad, pp. 132–137. (In Russ.)
• Shulga, P.I. 2003, Necropolisof the Scythian time Lokot’-4a. AltGU, Barnaul, 204 p. (In Russ.)
• Shulga, P.I. 2010, Xinjiang in the VIII–III centu- ries BC (Burial grounds. Chronology and periodiza- tion). AltGTU, Barnaul, 238p. (In Russ.)
• Shulga, P.I. 2015, “About the graves of Korgantass type”, Sakskaya kultura Saryarki v kontekste izucheniya etnosociokulturnykh protsessov Stepnoy Evrazii (“The Saka culture of Saryarka in the Context of Studying Ethnosociocultural Processes of Steppe Eurasia”), NICIA Begazy-Tasmola, Almaty, pp. 405–418. (In Russ.)
• Shulga, P.I., Myglan, V.S., Slyusarenko, I.Yu. 2016, “Chronology of Burial Grounds during the Late Pazyryk Culture: Dendrochronological Scale and Archaeological Aspect”, Altay v krugu evraziyskikh drevnostey (“Altai among Eurasian Antiquities”), IAET SO RAN, Novosibirsk, pp. 272–285. (In Russ.)
• Shulga, P.I., Shulga, D.P. 2017, “Pazyryk entry into Xinjiang”, Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, vol.16, no. 4: Oriental Studies, pp. 24–29. (In Russ.)
• Yarygin, S.A., Ilderyakov, N. N. 2021, “Burial of the “Pazyryk type” at the Tausamaly burial ground”, Nations and religions of Eurasia, no. 2 (27), pp. 23–39. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.14258/nreur(2021)2–02
• Törbat, Ts., Giscard, P.H., Batsükh, D. 2009, “First Excavation of Pazyryk Kurgans in Mongolian Altai”, Current Archaeological Research in Mongolia, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Bonn, pp. 221–230.