ISSN: 1814-1692 eISSN: 2782-2842 DOI: 10.31833/UAV

Barrows of the Sintashta culture: planigraphic analysis of the under-mound burials

Year: 2022

Pages: 92-99

UDC: 903.5 (470.55/58)

Number: Volume 22, issue 1

Type: scientific article

BBK: 63.4 (235.55)

DOI: https://doi. org/10.31833/uav/2022.22.1.010

Topic: Ancient times fnd the modern era

Authors: Khavansky, Alexey I.

Summary:

This article presents a recently developed classification of the Sintashta barrows, which includes the four the main types of barrows with under-mound burials. Type 1 encompasses barrows with several burials in pits, two of which are located in the middle of the under-mound space. The rest of the burials form one or more concentric rings around the central ones. The overall numbers of graves in these barrows can vary from 8 to 40. In most cases (up to 80%), they are surrounded by a ditch. Barrows of the first type have the average diameter of 25 metres and the height of 0.7–1.0 metres. They account for approximately 30% percent of all burial assemblages of the Sintashta culture. Type 2 consists of barrows with a simple rounded structure. Buri- als in such barrows are organized in circles or semicircles around the central point of the under-mound space. Within this type the average diameter of barrows is 13 meters and the height is 0.3 metres. They account for 16% percent of all Sintashta burial assemblages. Type 3 includes barrows with two burials in pits. Usually, one burial is found in the core part and the other one at the periphery of the under-mound space. The average diameter of such barrows equals 17.5 meters, the height – 0.5 metres. They account for 24% percent of all burial assemblages of the Sintashta culture. Type 4 contains barrows, which display only one burial placed in the middle of the under-mound space. These burials can be surrounded by a ditch or an earthwork enclosure. Some of them contain the remnants of animal sacrifices. The burials discovered in barrows of the fourth type are, on average, much larger in size than those from the other types of barrows (types 1-3). Additionally, all such barrows excavated so far have been robbed or disturbed. This fact can serve as indirect evidence of their richness. The average diameter of type 4 barrows is 17.5 meters and their height is 0.7 metres. They account for 30% percent of all Sintashta burial assemblages. The outlined differences in structures of burials and barrows reflect the social heterogeneity of the Sintashta culture. Specifically, barrows of the first type contain mostly graves of warriors or members of elite social communities. Barrows of the second type include elite burials of the representatives of the poorer and smaller communities/families. Barrows of the third and fourth types display burials of honored people, whose social status or occupation did not allow them to be buried in a mass grave. One of such isolated groups was metallurgists.

Keywords:

синташтинская культура, погребальный обряд, курган, планиграфия, типология

References:

  • Zdanovich, D.G., Kirillov,A.K., & Gutkov, A.I., Petrov, F.N., Gaiduchenko, L.L., Kupriyanova, E.V., Bushmakin, A.Ph., Popov, V.A., Lindstrom, Rich- ard W., Mednikova, M.B., Privat, Karen. 2002, “Arkaim: necropolis (based on the assemblages from the mound 25 of the Bolshekaragansky buri- al ground)”. Vol. 1, Yuzhnoural’skoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo, Chelyabinsk, 216 p. (In Russ.)
  • Botalov, S.G., Grigoriev, S.A., Zdanovich, G.B. 1996, “The Bronze age burial assemblages from the Bolshekaragansky burial ground (on the results of ar- chaeological excavations in 1988)”, Materialy po arheologii i etnografii Yuzhnogo Urala (“Materials on archeology and ethnography of the Southern Urals”). Kamennyj poyas, Chelyabinsk, pp. 64–88. (In Russ.)
  • Vinogradov, N.B. 2003, “The Bronze Age ne- cropolis Krivoe Ozero in the Southern Trans-Urals region”. Yuzhnoural’skoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo, Che- lyabinsk, 362 p. (In Russ.)
  • Vinogradov, N.B. 2011, “Steppes of the Southern Urals and Kazakhstan in the first centuries of the 2nd millennium BC (archaeological sites of the Sintash- ta and Petrovka type)”. Abris, Chelyabinsk, 175 p. (In Russ.) 
  • Gening, V.F., Zdanovich, G.B., Gening, V.V. 1992, “Sintashta. Archaeological sites of the Aryan tribes of the Ural-Kazakhstan steppes. Part 1”. CHelGU, Che- lyabinsk, 408 p. (In Russ.)
  • Epimakhov,A.V. 1996, “Barrow necropolis Soln- tse 2 – a burial assemblage of the fortified settlement Ust’e dated to the Middle Bronze Age”, Materialy po arheologii i etnografii Yuzhnogo Urala (“Materials on archeology and ethnography of the Southern Urals”). Kamennyj poyas, Chelyabinsk, pp. 22–42. (In Russ.)
  • Epimakhov,A.V. 2005, “Early Complex Societies in Northern Central Eurasia (Based on Material from the Necropole Kamennyi Ambar-5). Book 1». Chely- abinskij dom pechati, Chelyabinsk, 192 p. (In Russ.)
  • Zdanovich, D.G.  1997,  “Sintashta     soci- ety: social foundations of the “quasi-urban” cul- ture of Middle Bronze Age in the Southern Trans- Urals”. SPLiAC “Arkaim”,   Chelyabinsk,   93 p. (In Russ.)
  • Kalieva, S.S., Logvin, V.N. 2009, “A new ne- cropolis near the settlement of Bestamak (preliminary data)”, Vestnik Archeologii, Antropologii i Etnografii, no. 9, pp. 32–58. (In Russ.)
  • Korenevsky, S.N. 2010, “The phenomenon of big Maykop barrows: social and religious aspects of con- struction”, KSIA, iss. 224, pp. 149–170. (In Russ.)
  • Kupriyanova, E.V. 2016, “The Bronze Age fu- nerary rites in the Southern Trans-Urals: necropolis of Stepnoye-1 (results of excavations in 2008, 2010- 2011, 2014)”. Entsiklopediya, Chelyabinsk, 119 p. (In Russ.)
  • Kupriyanova, E.V., Stokolos, V.S., & Petrov, N.F., Batanina, N.S. 2020, “Necropolis of Stepnoye 25: cultural syncretism on the border of the steppe”. CHelGU, Chelyabinsk, 155 p. (In Russ.)
  • Malyutina, T.S.,  Zdanovich, G.B.,  Gavrily- uk, A.G. 2010, “Necropolises of Arkaim fortified set- tlements: Alexandrovsky IV. Burials of the patriarchs in the Arkaim Valley”, Arkaim – Sintashta: drevnee nasledie Yuzhnogo Urala: k 70-letiyu G.B. Zdanovicha (“Arkaim - Sintashta: ancient heritage of the Southern Urals: to the 70th anniversary of G.B. Zdanovich”). CHelGU, Chelyabinsk, pp. 179–206. (In Russ.)
  • Porokhova, O.I. 1992, “2nd Gerasimovsky necrop- olis in the Orenburg region”, Drevnyaya istoriya naseleniya Volgo-Ural’skih stepej (“The ancient history of the population in the Volga-Ural steppes”). OGPI, Orenburg, pp. 92–107. (In Russ.)
  • Evgeniev,A.A., Kuptsova, L.V., & Mukhamet- dinov, V.I., Roslyakova, N.V., Usachuk,A.N., Faizyl- lin, I.A., Hohlov,A.A. 2016, “Maloyuldashevo 1 – the Neolithic and Late Bronze age settlement in Western Orenburg region”. Izdatel’skij centr OGAU, Oren- burg, 196 p. (In Russ.)
  • Rostunov, V.L. 2004, “On the question of con- struction techniques and semantics of the big Maykop barrows in Central Caucasus region (based on the as- semblage from the mound No.3 near the village of Brut)”, Materialy i issledovaniya po arheologii Sever- nogo Kavkaza. (“Materials and research on the arche- ology of the North Caucasus”). Iss. 4, AGPI, Armavir, pp. 29–45. (In Russ.)
  • Stefanov, V.I., Epimakhov,A.V. 2006, “Sintashtin- sky 3rd (small) barrow: some details and new aspects of study”, Voprosy arheologii Povolzh’ya. (“Questions of archeology of the Volga region”). Iss. 4, Nauchno- tekhnicheskij centr, Samara, pp. 263–273. (In Russ.)
  • Smirnov, K.F., Kuzmina, E.E. 1977, “The origin of the Indo-Iranians in light of the latest archaeologi- cal discoveries”. Nauka, Moscow, 84 p. (In Russ.)
  • Tkachev, V.V. 2007, “Steppes of the Southern Urals and Western Kazakhstan at the turn of the Middle and Late Bronze Ages”. Aktyubinskij oblast- noj centr istorii, etnografii i arheologii, Aktobe, 384 p. (In Russ.)
  • Khavansky,A.I. 2019, “ To the question of the social stratification of Sintashta burials”, Drevnosti Vostochnoj Evropy, Central’noj Azii i Yuzhnoj Sibiri v kontekste svyazej i vzaimodejstvij v evrazijskom kul’turnom prostranstve (novye dannye i koncepcii): Materialy Mezhdunar. konf., 18–22 noyabrya 2019 g., Sankt-Peterburg. Svyazi, kontakty i vzaimodejstviya drevnih kul’tur Severnoj Evrazii i civilizacij Vostoka v epohu paleometalla (IV–I tys. do n.e.). K 80-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya vydayushchegosya arheologa V.S. Bochkaryova. (“Antiquities of East Europe, South Asia and South Siberia in the context of connections and interactions within the Eurasian cultural space (new data and concepts) Proceedings of the Interna- tional Conference, November 18–22, 2019, St. Peters- burg. Contacts, relations and interactions of the ancient cultures of Northern Eurasia and civilizations of the East during the Early Metal age (4th -1st millennia BC).To the 80th anniversary of an outstanding archae- ologist V.S. Bochkarev”). Vol. II, IIMK RAN, Saint Petersburg, pp. 233–234 (In Russ.)
  • Shevnina, I.V., Logvin,A.V. 2015, “Bronze age burial ground Halvay III in North Kazakhstan”, Mate- rialy i issledovaniya po arheologii Kazahstana (“Ma- terials and researches on archeology of Kazakhstan”). Vol. VII, Izdatel’skaya gruppa filiala Instituta arheologii im. A.H. Margulana, Astana, 247 p. (In Russ.)
Download pdf
up
Search
ISSN: 1814-1692 eISSN: 2782-2842 DOI: 10.31833/UAV