Ufa Archaeological Herald

Migration processes played a crucial role in shaping cultural identities of peoples of the Indian subcontinent. Since the start of the 1^st century BC, the Saka tribes massively migrated to the Northwestern part of Hindustan, subsequently founding there the Indo-Scythian kingdom. Later, in the 1^st century AD this terri- tory became a part of the Kushan Empire formed by the Kushans. The influence of these Central Asian peoples is seen in all forms of Ancient Indian culture, however only a few studies so far have examined its features and manifestations. This article discusses the ways and mechanisms of the Indo-Scythian and Kushan cultures development and determines the role of independent historical and cultural regions in this process, using data from the study of large-scale and small-scale sculpture. The aim of the study is to analyze the transformation of images of the Central Asian peoples in sculpture on the territory of Northwestern Hindustan, based on the arte- facts from the sites of Khalchayan, Dalverzin Tepe, Dilberjin Tepe, Airatam, Surkh Kotal, Gandhara, Mathura, Sangola, Sematan, Ushkur and Kanishpur. The first part of the article describes the features the sculptural im- ages of the Saka and Yuezhi peoples (the end of the 2^nd – the beginning of the 1^st century BC), which come from Bactria and Sughd region. These sculptures are characterized by a wide range of topics – both religious and secular. Large-scale sculptures are created in expressive realistic style, which was formed in India due to the influence of the Greeks. The second part of the article presents a complex characteristics of the sculpture from the cites of Gandhara, Mathura and Kashmir. Large-scale and small-scale sculpture from this region shows images of the Indo-Scythians (1^st century BC – 3^rd century AD) and the Kushans (from 1^st century onwards). These peoples are usually depicted with beards, wearing cone-shaped hats, dressing-gowns with belts, sirwals and shoes. It should be noted that Indo-Scythians usually have more slim-waisted garments and less number of decorations on them. This period saw the flourishing of the Gandhara and Mathura schools of sculpture. One of their key results was the creation of the first anthropomorphic image of the Buddha. Before that, Buddha had never been represented in an anthropomorphic form, but only through symbols. The significant influence of Buddhism contributed to the development of sculpture throughout the Kushan Empire.

anthropomorphic sculpture, Yuezhi, Indo-Scythians, Kushans, Central Asia, North India

• Deshpande, O.P. 2008, “Indian sculpture from the Hermitage. Antiquity and the Middle Ages”. Izdatel’stvo Gosudarstvennogo Ermitazha, St. Peters- burg, 87 p. (In Russ.)
• Kruglikova, I.T. 1974, “Dilberjin Tepe. Excava- tions 1970-1972”. Part 1. Nauka, Moscow, 112 p. (In Russ.)
• Meshkeris, V.A. 2004, “Indian traditions in the artistic culture of Central Asia”. Nestor-Istoriya, St. Petersburg, 164 p. (In Russ.)
• Omel’chenko, A.V. 2021, “On the terracotta plastics of antique Sogdiana”, Archeological News, Iss. 32, pp. 255–273 (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi. org/10.31600/1817-6976-2021-32-255-273
• Pugachenkova, G.A. 1979, “The Art of Bac- tria during the Kushan period”. Iskusstvo, Moscow, 248 p. (In Russ.)
• Pugachenkova, G.A. 1982, “The Art of Gandha- ra”. Iskusstvo, Moscow, 196 p. (In Russ.)
• Rtveladze, E.V. 2019, “Kushan kingdom. Dynas- ties, states, people, language, writing, religions”. Is- toricheskaya biblioteka, Tashkent, 133 p. (In Russ.)
• Stavisky, B.Ya. 1968, “Central Asia and Ancient India (historical and cultural interactions and connec- tions)”, Doklady otdelenij i komissij Geografichesk- ogo obshchestva SSSR. Etnografiya (“Reports of de- partments and commissions of the Geographical So- ciety of the USSR. Ethnography.”). Iss. 5, Leningrad, pp. 55–67 (In Russ.)
• Stavisky, B.Ya. 1977, “Kushan Bactria: prob- lems of history and culture”. Nauka, Moscow, 296 p. (In Russ.)
• Suleymanov, R.K. 2000, “Ancient Nakhshab. Problems of civilization of Uzbekistan 7^th century BC
• – 7^th century AD”. Fan, Samarkand; Tashkent, 343 p.
• (In Russ.)
• Shah, M.A. 2014, “Revisiting the chronology of the early sculptural art of Kashmir, India”. Archaeol- ogy, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia. no. 59(3), pp. 80–86. (In Russ.)
• Yatsenko, S.A. 2006, “Costumes of Ancient Eur- asia (the Iranian-Speaking Peoples)”. Vostochnaya literatura, Moscow, 661 p. (In Russ.)
• Abdullaev K. 2007, “Nomad migration in Cen- tral Asia”, After Alexander: Central Asia before Islam. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 73–98.
• Albery, H. 2020, “Buddhism and Society in the Indic North and Northwest: 2nd Century BCE – 3rd Century CE”. Front Cover Ludwig-Maximilians-Uni- versität, 673 p.
• Asthana, S., Swaraj, P., Gupta, S.P. 1985, “The Kushāṇa Art from Mathura”, Kushāṇa Sculptures from Sanghol”. New Delhi, pp. 33–48.
• Basham, A.L. 1981, “The Evolution of the Con- cept of the Bodhisattva”, The Bodhisattva Doctrine in Buddhism. Wilfred Laurier University Press, Water- loo, pp. 19–59.
•  
• Benjamin, C. 2006, “The Yuezhi: Origin, Migra- tion and the Conquest of Northern Bactria”. Brepols, Louvain, 245 p.
• Dani, A.H. 1968, “Chakdara Fort and Gandhara Art: Introduction”, Ancient Pakistan. Vol. 4, pp. 1–32.
• Goldman, B. 1978, “Parthians at Gandhāra”, East and West. Vol. 28, no. 1/4, pp. 189–202.
• Kak, R.C. 1985, Handbook of the Archaeologi- cal and Numismatic Sections of the ShriPratap Singh Museum Srinagar. Eastern Book House, Patna, 165 p. Kidd, F. 2002, “The Chronology and Style of a Group of Sogdian Statuettes”, Walls and Frontiers in Inner Asian History. Silk Roads Studies, Turnhout, vol. 1, pp. 197–214.
• Konow, S. 1929, “Kharoshthi Inscriptions with the Exception of Those of Asoka”. Corpus Inscriptio- num Indicarum, Vol. 2. Part 1. Calcutta: Government of India, 351 p.
• Linrothe, R. 1993, “Inquiries into the Origin of the Buddha Image”, East and West. Vol. 43, pp. 241–256. Liu, X. 2001, “Migration and Settlement of the Yuezhi-Kushan: Interaction and Interdependence of Nomadic and Sedentary Societies”. Journal of World History, University  of Hawaii  Press. Vol. 12, no. 2, 261–292.
• Lohuizen-de Leeuw, J.E. 1972, “Gandhara and Mathura: Their Cultural Relationship”, Aspects of In- dian Art. E.J. Brill, Leiden, pp. 27–43.
• Mani, B.R. 2004, “Excavation at Ambaran and Akhnurterracottas”. Buddhism and Gandhara Art. In- dian Inst, of Advanced Study, Shimla, pp. 83–102.
• Marshall, J. 1960, “The Buddhist art of Gandhāra: the story of the early school, its birth, growth and de- cline”. University Press for the Department of Archae- ology in Pakistan, Cambridge, 118 p.
• Nikonorov, V.P. 1997, “The Armies of Bactria, 700 BC – 450 AD”. Vol. 1–2. Stockport, 144 p.
• Olbrycht, M.J. 2015, “Arsacid Iran and the No- mads of Central Asia”, Ways of Cultural Transfer. Complexity of Interaction along the Eurasian Steppe Zone in the First Millennium CE. Bonn Contributions to Asian Archaeology. Vol. 7, pp. 333–390.
• Pons, J. 2014, “The Figure with a Bow in Gandhāran Great Departure Scenes. Some New Read- ings”, Entangled Religions. Vol. 1, pp. 15–94.
• Pugachenkova, G.A. 1989, “The Terra-Cotta Horses of Bactria-Tokharistan: Semantics and Im- age”, Bulletin of the Asia Institute. New Series, Vol. 3, pp. 15–19.
• Pugachenkova, G.A., Dar, S.R. & Sharma, R.C., Joyenda, M.A., Siddiqi, H. 1994, “Kushan art”, Histo- ry of Civilizations of Central Asia. Vol. 2, pp. 331–395.
• Ray, S. 2005, “Scythian elements in early Indian art”. University of Calcutta, 266 p.
• Rezakhani, K. 2017, “East Iran in Late Antiqui- ty”, Reorienting the Sasanians: East Iran in Late An- tiquity. Edinburgh University Press, pp. 1–256.
• Rhi, J.H. 1994, “From Bodhisattva to Buddha: The Beginning of Iconic Representation in Buddhist Art”, ArtibusAsiae. Vol. 54, no. 3/4, pp. 207–225.
• Rostovtzeff, M.I. 1929, “The Animal Style in South Russia and China”. Princeton, Leipzig, Lon- don, 112 p.
• Stronge, S., Smith, N., Harle, J.C. 1988, “A Gold- en Treasury: Jewellery from the India subcontinent”. Victoria and Albert Museum, London, 144 p. “The Geography of Gandhāran Art. Proceed- ings of the Second International Workshop of the Gandhāra Connections Project”, University of Ox- ford, 2019. 186 p.
• Zadneprovsky, Y.A. 1999, “Migration Paths of the Yueh-chih based on Archaeological Evidence”, Circle of Inner Asian Art Newsletter, no. 8, pp. 3–16.