ISSN: 1814-1692 eISSN: 2782-2842 DOI: 10.31833/UAV

A new find of red jasper projectile point from the zilim river in the Southern Cis-Urals

Year: 22

Pages: 35-40

UDC: 903.01 (470.57)

Number: Volume 22, issue 1

Type: scientific article

BBK: 63.4 (235.55)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31833/uav/2022.22.1.004

Topic: The stone age: time, tecnologies,art, ritual

Authors: Akhmetova, Ekaterina A.

Summary:

This article examines the results of archaeological excavations at the burial ground of the early nomadic elite in the Aktobe region of the Republic of Kazakhstan. In the course of last two years several burial grounds have been studied in this region, near Taskopa settlement. One of them is the Taskopa-V burial ground, the Mound 1 of which was 2.2 meters tall and had a diameter of 33 meters. It was surrounded by a water trench 2 to 5 meters wide and 1 meter deep. A single grave was located right in the centre of the mound in a square pit. The pit’s perimeter was 6 meters. From the south side the pit was joined by an underground passage-dromos. A collective pit grave contained remains of five individuals. Remains of the three of them were disturbed by robbers. All of the dead lay stretched out on their backs, four individuals lay with their heads oriented to the south, one – with his head oriented to the northeast. Funerary inventory consisted of three quivers with arrows (two of them contained over 100 arrows each), short iron sword (acinaces), bronze mirrors and a ceramic vessel with round bottom. Two of the dead were wearing bracelets and beads made of semi-precious stones. One possessed both jewelry and a weapon (a quiver with arrows). The central part of the burial pit was occupied by a ritual complex consisting of several objects. The most unique artefact was an iron rod with a bone handle depicting a predator preparing to jump. It was placed next to a ritual iron “spade” accompanied by a decorated animal skin. Skin’s decorations included a row of golden plates in the animal (zoomorphic) style, showing the heads of ungulates (hoofed mammals), and large multicolored stone beads. The age of the ritual complex is determined by the quivers containing large three-edged and tribladed arrowheads with projecting and interior sockets and excurvate heads, by the iron acinaces with a bar-shaped rectangular pommel and kidney-shaped (lobed) cross-guard and by the bronze mirrors with the wide edge. It is also worth mentioning a discovery of a double-edged arrowhead with a stem socket. Based on the characteristics of the funerary ritual and artefacts the ritual complex could be dated to the early Sarmatian archaeological culture, ca. the middle – third quarter of the V century BC. Materials from the Taskopa-V burial ground look very similar to those from the Filippovka-1 burial ground. For example, the golden plates from the two sites look almost identical and could have been made in the same place. Although the Taskopa-V burial ground chronologically precedes Filippovka-1 burial ground. Perhaps Taskopa-V marks the trajectory of the ancient peoples’ movement from Western Kazakhstan to Cis-Urals. Burial with dromos made in a square pit and the presence of golden items and symbols of authority (a rod and, possibly, a military banner) indicate that the Taskopa-V burial ground contains a collective grave of the representatives of the elite of the early nomads of the early Iron Age.

Keywords:

Chalcolithic, Southern Urals, Cis-Urals, stone projectile point, accidental discovery

References:

  • Akhatov,A.T. Scientific report on the archaeological exploration in the Gafuriysky district of the Re- public of Bashkortostan in 2014. Ufa, 2015 (In Russ.)
  • Akhmetova, E.A. 2014, “Archaeological sites in the mountain stream of the Belaya river (South- ern Urals)”, Trudy IV (XX) Vserossijskogo arheologicheskogo s’ezda v Kazani (“Proceedings of the 4th (20th) All-Russian Archaeological Congress in Kazan”), vol. 1, Otechestvo, Kazan’, pp. 198–202 (In Russ.)
  • Akhmetova, E.A. 2018a, “To the history of studying the Neolithe-Eneolithis of the mountain-forest zone of the South Urals”, Ufa Archaeological Her- ald, vol. 18, pp. 108–119. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi. org/10.31833/uav.2018.18.009
  • Akhmetova, E.A. 2018b, “Neolithic and Eneo- lithic of the Bashkir Urals”, Drevnosti Bashkirskogo Urala (“Antiquities of the Bashkir Urals region: a col- lective monograph”), Ufa, pp. 161–163 (In Russ.)
  • Bibikov, S.N. 1940, “Paleolithic cave sites of the river basin Yuryuzan (South Urals)”, KSIIMK, vol. III, pp.35–39 (In Russ.)
  • Bibikov, S.N. 1950, “Neolithic and Eneolithic cultural remains in caves of the Southern Urals”, Sovetskaya arheologiya, XIII, pp. 95–138 (In Russ.)
  • Vorob’yova, S.L. 2014, Scientific report on the archaeological exploration in the Gafuriysky district of the Republic of Bashkortostan according to the permit no. 995 dated by 01.08.2013, Ufa (In Russ.)
  • Kuznetsova, L.V., LastovskyA.A. & Mamontov,A.E., Vybornov,A.A., Vasiliev, I.B., Ovchinnikova, N.V., Khokhlov,A.A., Yablonsky, L.T. 2000, A his- tory of the Samara Volga region from Ancient times to the present day. Stone Age. SNC RAN, Samara, 312 p. (In Russ.)
  • The catalog of archeological monuments of Bash- kiria discovered in 1971-1980. BRO VOOPIK, Ufa, 1982. 80 p. (In Russ.)
  • Konovalov,A.V. 1965, Report on the archaeo- logical exploration of the Zilim river from July 20 to August 13, 1965, Ufa (In Russ.)
  • Krizhevskaya, L.Ya. 1977, The Early Bronze Age in the Southern Trans-Urals. LGU, Leningrad, 129 p. (In Russ.)
  • Morozov, Yu.A. 1980, Scientific report on the results of archaeological research in 1980, Ufa (In Russ.)
  • Morozov, Yu.A. 1981, Scientific report on the results of archaeological research in 1981, Ufa (In Russ.)
  • Morozov, Yu.A. 1992, “Materials  on  the Stone Age in the Ufa Plateau”, Materialy po arheolo- gii Yuzhnogo Urala (“Materials on the archaeol- ogy of the Southern Urals”), BashGU, Ufa, pp. 5–23 (In Russ.)
  • Morozov, Yu.A. 2000, “Trans-Ural Chalcolithic population in the Cis-Urals region”, Etnosy i kul’tury na styke Azii i Evropy: Sb. statej k 50-letiyu nauchnoj deyatel’nosti chlena-korrespondenta RAN R.G. Ku- zeeva (“Ethnic groups and cultures at the border of Asia and Europe: a collection of papers to the 50th an- niversary of the scientific career of the Corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences R.G. Kuzeev”), Gilem, Ufa, pp. 110–116 (In Russ.) Mosin, V.S. 2019, The Southern Urals in the
  • Stone Age. SUSU, Chelyabinsk, 408 p. (History of the Southern Urals: in 8 vols. Vol. 1) (In Russ.)
  • Mosin, B.C., Nikolsky, V.Yu. 2005, “Distribu- tion of siliceous rocks (silicites) – raw materials for the manufacturing of Stone Age tools in the Southern Urals”, Izvestiya Chelyabinskogo nauchnogo centra, Iss. (29), pp. 96–100 (In Russ.)
  • Rauschenbach, V.M. 1950, “The Neolithic site near the village of Bolshoye Bun’kovo” KSIIMK, Iss. XXXII. pp. 151–156 (In Russ.)
  • Ruslanov, E.V. 2019, “Beregovka archaeological microdistrict in the system of antiquities in the Southern Urals, Dissertation for the degree of the Candi- date of Historical Sciences”, Ufa, 463 p. (In Russ.)
  • Sidorov, V.V. 2013, “Specificity of stone technol- ogy Volosovo culture”, The Volga River Region Ar- chaeology, n. 1(3), pp. 96–113 (In Russ.) DOI: https:// doi.org/10.24852/pa2013.1.3.96.112
  • Sluchainye nakhodki: khronologiya, atributsiya, istoriko-kul’turnyi kontekst (“Accidental finds: chro- nology, attribution, historical and cultural context”). Materials of the thematic scientific conference. St. Pe- tersburg, December 16–19, 2008. St. Petersburg, 2008, 285 p. (in Russ.)
Download pdf
up
Search
ISSN: 1814-1692 eISSN: 2782-2842 DOI: 10.31833/UAV