Ufa Archaeological Herald

Petrographic methods are often considered as a useful tool in archaeological studies of the Early Neolithic pottery. This paper presents some results of the petrographic analysis of pottery assemblages from the territory encompassing Ladoga and Onega Lake basins and Belomor’e. Earlier studies have found that Sper- rings pottery is made of clay tempered with grus and rarely with sand or chamotte. The current study expands prior research, by comparing pottery from the two archaeological sites (Derevyannoe 1a and Orovnavolok 8) belonging to different periods. The first site exhibits a pottery assemblage characterized by retreating-drawn ornaments and is dated to the early – mid-4^th millennium BC. The second site displays pottery assemblages with vertebral ornamentation dated to the end of the 5^th – the beginning of the 4^th millennium BC. A set of samples from Derevyannoe 1a and Orovnavolok 8 were viewed under Binocular MBS-1 in Herzen University using ×16, ×24 and ×140 magnification modes. Petrographic analysis has shown no differences between the tempers in pottery sherds from the two sites. Some clay variations, however, have been identified. It was found that Sperrings pottery from Orovnavolok 8 is made mostly of fat clays containing hydrous mica and smectite mine- rals, while Sperrings pottery from Derevyannoe 1a is made of lean hydrous mica and smectite clays. Lean clays are less plastic than fat clays and therefore, less suitable for pottery production. Probably, they were used due to the lack of fat clay deposits near Derevyannoe 1a settlement. Alternatively, the choice of clay type can be viewed as a chronological sign of the late stage of the Sperrings culture.

petrographic analysis, fat clay, lean clay, Sperrings pottery

• Vasilyeva, T.A. 2019, “Ancient pottery production technology in Neolithic Karelia”, Proceedings of Petrozavodsk state university, no. 2 (179), pp. 8–17. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15393/uchz. art.2019.284
• Vitenkova, I.F. 1996, “The Sperrings culture”, Arheologiya Karelii (“Archaeology of Karelia”), KarNC RAN, Petrozavodsk, pp. 65–81. (In Russ.)
• German, K.E.       2002,       “Chronology       and periodization of the Sperrings culture”, Tverskoj arheologicheskij           sbornik     (“Tver      archaeological collection of articles”), vol. 5, Tverskoj ob”edinennyj gosudarstvennyj muzej, Tver, pp. 264–273. (In Russ.) German, K.E.,  Kulkova, M.A.    2019,    “New petrographic study of the Sperrings ceramics of the monuments of Lake Оnega basin”, Proceedings of Petrozavodsk state university, no. 6 (183), pp. 12–21.(In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15393/uchz. art.2019.366
• German, K.E., Kulkova, М.А. 2020,“Petrographic studies of the Sperrings ceramics from south- western Karelia”, Proceedings of Petrozavodsk State University, Vol. 42, no. 8 (183), pp. 8–14. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15393/uchz.art.2019.366
• Ivanishchev,A.M., Ivanishcheva, M.V. 2000a, “Tudozero 5 – the Late Mesolithic – Early Neolithic settlement site in the Southern part of the Onega basin”, Tverskoj arheologicheskij sbornik (“Tver archaeological collection of articles”), vol. 4, Tverskoj ob”edinennyj gosudarstvennyj muzej, Tver, pp. 284–295.(In Russ.).
• Ivanishchev,A.M., Ivanishcheva, M.V. 2000b, “Early Neolithic settlement near Lake Kemskoye”, Tverskoj arheologicheskij sbornik (“Tver archaeological collection of articles”), vol. 4, Tverskoj ob”edinennyj gosudarstvennyj muzej, Tver, pp. 297–305(In Russ.)
• Ivanishcheva, M.V., Kulkova, M.A., Ivanishcheva, E.A. 2016, “Results of the micromorphological analysis of the Early Neolithic pottery from the Southeastern area of the Onega basin”, Tradicii i innovacii v izuchenii drevnejshej keramiki: materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii 24–27 maya 2016 goda, Sankt-Peterburg (“Traditions and innovations in the study of the ancient pottery: Proceedings of the International scientific conference, May 24–27, 2016, Saint Petersburg”), IIMK RAN, St. Petersburg, pp. 88-99. (In Russ.)
• Kulkova, M.A. 2015, “Household and sacred use of the pottery by the sarmatian tribes of the Southern Urals and Western Kazakhstan”, Samara Journal of Science, no. 3 (12), pp. 100–107. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/snv20153208
• Kosmenko, M.G. Report on the  field  work of the Medvezhegorsky detachment of Karelian archaeological expedition and the archaeological detachment of Kostomuksha united expedition in 1975, Archive IA RAN, F–1, R–1, no 6054. (In Russ.)
• Lobanova, N.V. Report on the archaeological research of the Onega detachment in the Pryazhinsky, Prionezhsky, Pudozhsky and Medvezhyegorsky districts of the Republic of Karelia in 1995, Archive IA RAN, F–1, R–1, no. 20011. (In Russ.)
• Pankrushev, G.A. Report on the field work of Karelian archaeological expedition in 1957, Archive IA RAN, F–1, R–1, no. 1610. (In Russ.)
• Pankrushev, G.A. Report on the field work of the archaeological expedition in 1958, Archive IA RAN, F–1, R–1, no. 1812. (In Russ.)
• Pesonen, P.E. 1991, “Chronology and periodization of the Sperrings culture”, Hronologiya i periodizaciya arheologicheskih pamyatnikov Karelii (“Chronology and periodization of the archaeological sites in Karelia”), KarNC RAN, Petrozavodsk, pp. 65–85. (In Russ.)
• Filatova, V.F. Report on the field work of the Povenetsky detachment of Karelian archaeological expedition in 1970, Archive IA RAN, F–1, R–1, no. 4116. (In Russ.)