UDC: 903.2 (4/5)
Number: Volume 22, issue 1
Type: scientific article
BBK: 63.4 (235.55)
Authors: Grigoriev, Stanislav A.
At the beginning of the 2nd millennium BC, chariots spread over the vast spaces of Eurasia from the Balkans-Carpathians to Kazakhstan. It is generally accepted that chariots were invented in the Urals, by the Sintashta culture and they are often found in the Sintashta burial complexes. From the Urals, they were distributed around Eastern Europe, and then to the Carpathians and Mycenaean Greece. In the other areas the remains of chariots have not been found. However, some artefacts that imply their presence (like the elements of the bridle, horn and bone cheekpieces) were discovered. Sintashta cheekpieces are disc-shaped (round or with a plank) and have spikes. On their basis, cheekpieces of the Petrovka and Alakul cultures were created and spread in the Trans-Urals and Kazakhstan. At the same time, cheekpieces in these cultures often have some western features (Carpatho-Mycenaean ornaments, a rod-shaped plank, a hole in another plane or several holes along the plank). These features were typical for the cheekpieces of the Carpathian Basin which date back to the period of the formation of the Sintashta culture in the Urals. There also appeared rod-shaped cheekpieces and cheekpieces that combine the features of rod-shaped and disc-shaped ones. Therefore, the idea that the tradition of chariots using came to the Carpathians from the steppe zone has no chronological and typological grounds. In the forest-steppe and steppe zones of Eastern Europe chariots appeared in the Abashevo culture of the Don-Volga region as well as in the Potapovka culture of the Volga region. Chronologically these processes correspond to the final stage of the Sintashta culture. The cheekpieces combine the features of the Carpathian and Sintashta ones, which is explained by the impulses from both of these regions to Eastern Europe. Subse- quently, on this basis, cheekpieces of the Pokrovsk type of the early Srubnaya culture were formed. The cheek- pieces from Mycenaean Greece have no reliable parallels in the steppe. They are comparable to cheekpieces of the Carpathian Basin. This suggests that the skills of using chariots came to Greece not from the steppe, but from the Carpathians. The idea is also supported by the fact that the wheels used in Greece and the Carpathians had four spokes while the wheels used in the Urals displayed 10 to 12. Therefore, initially the chariots ap- peared independently in the west and east, and only at the end of the Sintashta period the two traditions began to intertwine.
chariots, evolution of cheekpieces, MBA–LBA transition, chronology and periodization
Bakhshiev, I.I., Usachuk,A.N., Verbovsky,A.V. 2020, “Plate cheekpiece from the Late Bronze Age settlement in the Bashkir Cis-Urals”, Voprosy arhe- ologii Povolzh’ja (“Problems of archaeology of the Volga region”), Slovo, Samara iss. 8, pp. 128–136 (In Russ.)
Bochkarev, V.S. 2017, “Stages of development of metal production of the Late Bronze Age in the south of Eastern Europe”, Stratum plus, no. 2, pp. 159–204 (In Russ.)
Bochkarev, V.S., Kuznetsov, P.F. 2010, “Grooved cheek pieces of the Late Bronze Age from Eurasian steppes”, Koni, kolesnicy i kolesnichie stepej Evrazii (“Horses, chariots and charioteers of the steppes of Eurasia”). Rifei, Yekaterinburg, Samara, Donetsk, pp. 292–343 (In Russ.)
Bochkarev, V.S., Kuznetsov, P.F. 2013, “Cultural and typological characteristics of the oldest disc- shaped cheekpieces of Northern Eurasia”, Problemy periodizacii i hronologii v arheologii epohi rannego metalla Vostochnoj Evropy: materialy tematicheskoj nauchnoj konferencii (“Problems of periodization and chronology in the archeology of the Early Metal Age of Eastern Europe: materials of the thematic sci- entific conference”). Skifia-Print, Saint-Petersburg, pp. 61–79 (In Russ.)
Bochkarev, V.S., Kuznetsov, P.F. 2019a, “Stag- es of development of disc-shaped cheekpieces in Northern Eurasia”. Drevnosti Vostochnoj Evropy, Central’noj Azii i Juzhnoj Sibiri v kontekste svjazej i vzaimodejstvij v evrazijskom kul’turnom prostranstve (novye dannye i koncepcii) (“Antiquities of Eastern Europe, Central Asia and Southern Siberia in the con- text of connections and interactions in the Eurasian cultural space (new data and concepts)”). IIMK RAN, Sankt Petersburg, pp. 160–162 (In Russ.)
Bochkarev, V.S., Kuznetsov, P.F. 2019b, “About one variety of the Late Bronze Age cheekpieces from Eastern Europe”, Arheologija Vostochno-Evropejskoj stepi (“Archeology of the East European steppe”), SGU, Saratov, iss. 15, pp. 44–58 (In Russ.)
Gening, V.F., Zdanovich, G.B., Gening, V.V. 1992, “Sintashta: Archaeological sites of the Aryan tribes of the Ural-Kazakhstan steppes”, P. 1, Yuzhno-Ural’skoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo, Chelyabinsk, 408 p. (In Russ.) Grigoriev, S.A. 2018, “The problem of chronol-
ogy of the Sintashta culture”, Stepnaya Evraziya v epohu bronzy: kul’tury, idei, tekhnologii: Sbornik nauchnyh trudov k 80-letiyu Gennadiya Borisovicha Zdanovicha, (“Steppe Eurasia in the Bronze Age: cultures, ideas, technologies: Collection of scientific papers dedicated to the 80th anniversary of Gennady Borisovich Zdanovich”). CHelGU, Chelyabinsk, pp. 37–61 (In Russ.)
Grigoriev, S.A., Petrova, L.Yu. & Pleshanov, M.L., Gushchina, E.V., Vasina, Yu.V. 2018, “The settlement of Mochishche and the Andronovo prob- lem”. Cicero, Chelyabinsk, 398 p. (In Russ.)
Denisov, I.V. 2001, “Bronze Age necropolises at Obilkin Lug near Sol-Iletsk”, Arheologicheskie pamjatniki Orenburzh’ja (“Archaeological sites of the Orenburg region”), iss. V. OGPU, Orenburg, pp. 38– 48 (In Russ.)
Zdanovich, G.B. 1988, “Ural-Kazakhstan steppes in the Bronze Age (bases of periodization)”. UrGU, Sverdlovsk, 184 p. (In Russ.)
Kalieva, S.S., Logvin, V.N. 2009, “Necropolis near the settlement of Bestamak (preliminary report)”, Vestnik Arheologii, Antropologii i Etnografii (“News of Archaeology, Anthropology and Ethnography”), iss. 9, pp. 32–58. (In Russ.)
Kuz’mina, E.E. 1980, “Once again about the disc- shaped cheekpieces from the Eurasian steppes”, Krat- kie soobshhenija Instituta arheologii (“Brief reports of the Institute of Archeology”), iss. 161, pp. 8–21 (In Russ.)
Pryakhin, A.D., Besedin, V.I. 1992, “Plate (discshaped) cheekpieces with inserted spikes from the territory of Eastern Europe”, Studia minora facultatis philosophical Universitatis Brunensis, no. 37, pp. 1–60 (In Russ.)
Pryakhin, A.D., Besedin, V.I. 1998, “Middle Bronze Age horse bridle in the Eastern European forest-steppe and steppe”, Russian Archaeology, no. 3, pp. 22–35 (In Russ.)
Tkachev, V.V. 2004, “Burial assemblages with plate cheekpieces in the Steppe Cis-Urals”, Psalii. Elementy upryazhi i konskogo snaryazheniya v drevnosti. Arheologicheskij al’manah (“Cheekpieces. Elements of harness and horse equipment in ancient times. Archaeological Almanac”), no. 15. Donetsk, pp. 7–30 (In Russ.)
Usachuk, A.N. 1999, “Regional varieties in the technology of plate cheekpieces manufacturing”, Kompleksnye obshhestva Central’noj Evrazii v III-I tys. do n.je.: regional’nye osobennosti v svete universal’nyh modelej (“Complex societies of Central Eurasia in the 3rd – 1st millennia BC: regional features in light of universal models”). CHelGU, Chelyabinsk, pp. 154–158 (In Russ.)
Usachuk, A.N. 2013, Ancient cheekpieces (manufacturing and usage). IA NANU, Kiev, Donetsk, 304 p. (In Russ.)
Chechushkov, I.V. 2013, “Chariot complex of the Eurasian steppes (from the Dnieper to the Irtysh)”. Dissertation ... Candidate of Historical Sciences. IA RAS, Moscow, 495 p.
Chechushkov, I.V., Yepimakhov,A.V. 2010, The chariot complex of the Ural-Kazakhstan steppes, Koni, kolesnicy i kolesnichie stepej Evrazii (“Horses, chariots and charioteers of the steppes of Eurasia”). Rifei, Yekaterinburg, Samara, Donetsk, pp. 182–229 (In Russ.)
Bátora, J. 2018, Slovensko v staršej dobe bronzovej. Bratislava: KO & KA, 445 p.
Bondár, M. Prehistoric wagon models in the Car- pathian Basin (3500–1500 BC). Archaeolingua, Budapest, 2012, 143 p.
Boroffka, N. 1998, “Bronze- und früheisenzeitliche Geweihtrensenknebel aus Rumänien und ihre Beziehungen. Alte Funde aus dem Museum für Geschichte Aiud, Teil II”, Eurasia Antiqua, no. 4, pp. 81– 135.
David, W. 2001, “Zu den Beziehungen zwischen Donau-Karpatenraum, osteuropäischen Steppengebieten und ägäisch-anatolischem Raum zur Zeit der mykenischen Schachtgräber unter Berücksichtigung neuerer Funde aus Südbayern”, The Mediterranean and Central Europe in contacts and confrontations (from the Bronze Age until the End of Antique). ANO∆OΣ, Trnava, pp. 51–80.
Grigoriev, S.A. 2021, “The evolution of antler and bone cheekpieces from the Balkan-Carpathian region to Central Kazakhstan: chronology of “chariot” cultures and Mycenaean Greece”, Journal of ancient history and archaeology. № 8.2, pp. 148–189. http:// dx.doi.org/10.14795/j.v8i2.633
Güneri, S. 2016, “An antler ‘cheek piece’ from Konya Karahöyük, Turkey: some remarks on horse and horse-drawn vehicle”, Altaj v krugu evrazijskih drevnostej (“Altai in the circle of Eurasian antiquities”). IAET SO RAN, Novosibirsk, pp. 152–167.
Hüttel, H.-G. 1981, “Bronzezeitliche Trensen in Mittel- und Osteuropa. Grundzüge ihrer Entwicklung. Prähistorische Bronzefunde”. Abt. XVI, B.2. Beck Verlag, München, 209 p.
Karo, G. 1930, “Die Schachgräber von Mykenai”. Bruckmann, München, 372 p.
Littauer, M.A., Crouwel, J.H. 1979, “Wheeled Vehicles and Ridden Animals in the Ancient Near East”. Brill, Leiden, 185 p.
Maran, J. 2020, “The Introduction of the Horse- Drawn Light Chariot – Divergent Responses to a Tech- nological Innovation in Societies between the Carpathian Basin and the East Mediterranean”, Objects, ideas and travelers: contacts between the Balkans, the Aegean and Western Anatolia during the Bronze and Early Iron Age. Habelt GmbH, Bonn, pp. 505–528.
Moorey, P.R.S. 1986, “The Emergence of the Light, Horse-Drawn Chariot in the Near-East c. 2000- 1500 B.C.”, World Archaeology, no. 18 (2), pp. 196– 215.
Penner, S. 1998, „Schliemanns Schlachtgräber- rund und der Europäische Nordosten“. Rudolf Ha- belt, Bonn, 240 p.
Penner, S. 2004, „Die Wagenscheiben aus Mykkene und ihre nordöstlichen Beziehungen“, Arheologicheskij al‘manah („Archaeological Almanac“), no. 15. Donetsk, pp. 62–91.