Ufa Archaeological Herald

The aim of this paper is to reflect on the role and functions of pottery fragments in the funerary rite of the Alakul culture on the basis of the artifacts recovered in Novoil’inovsky II necropolis (Kostanay region, Kazakhstan). Pottery fragments are viewed as an important element of the Alakul funerary rite, playing an independent ritual role in the process. Analysis of findings from the burials suggests that pottery fragmentation was not performed during the funerary rite. Instead of this pottery fragments were collected in advance and specially brought to the ritual site. The studied Novoil’inovsky II necropolis displays three main locations of pottery fragments: in the grave, in the ditch and in the burial pit. Most fragments discovered in the two later locations show the same features: no decoration, chipped rims and body, thick walls containing traces of fire. They could be interpreted as parts of pottery vessels used for everyday purposes like food cooking and transportation. Most likely such fragments were collected by settlers after pottery smashing to be later used in the funerary rite. Pottery fragments found at Novoil’inovsky II necropolis are widely spread around the territory of necropolis. Such pattern points to the presence of a mortuary ritual in the Andronovo culture, in which the pottery fragments were scattered around the grave. Similar rituals (called “shashu”) could be found in the traditional Kazakh culture. There people throw around small pieces of fried dough, spreading joy and blessing. Ethnographic evidence suggests that, pottery fragments have a symbolic meaning in life cycle rituals, marking a transition of a person from one stage of life to another, playing a role of a talisman, which gives an opportunity to increase wealth and happiness. In the rites of passage such as wedding of funerals pottery fragments function as a symbol of change in an individual’s social status. It is considered that in the Bronze Age funerary rite pottery fragment served as a symbolic medium between the living and the dead. It was an archetype of culture, born in the depths of the archaic rituals.

pottery fragment, ditch, burial pit, funerary rite, pottery smaching, shashu

• Argynbayev, K. 1974, “Kazakh wedding and wedding ceremonies in the past and present”, Sovetskaya etnografiya, no. 6, pp. 69–77. (In Russ.)
• Bayburin, A.K. 1993, “Ritual in the traditional culture. Structural and semantic analysis of the East Slavic rites”. Nauka, St. Petersburg, 253 p. (In Russ.)
• Butanayev, V.Y. 1999, “Khakassian-Russian historical and ethnographic dictionary”. Khakassia, Abakan, 240 p. (In Russ.)
• Gennep van, A. 1999, “The rites of passage. A systematic study of rites”. Vostochnaya literature, Moscow, 198 p. (In Russ.)
• Gern von, V. 1899, “From the notebooks. Ethnographic notes. The character and the customs of the Kyrgyz-Cossacks”, Pamyatnaya knizhka Semipalatinskoj oblasti na 1899 g. (“The Memorial book of the Semipalatinsk region of 1899”). Semipalatinsk, pp. 1–33. (In Russ.)
• Downs, D. 1978, “California”, Severoamerikanskiye indeytsy (“North American Indians”). Moscow, pp. 286–318. (In Russ.)
• Demidov, S.M. 1962, “On the question of some elements of pre-Islamic rites and beliefs among the Southwestern Turkmens”, Trudy instituta istorii, arkheologii i etnografii (“Proceedings of the Institute of History, Archaeology and Ethnography”), vol. 6. Ashkhabad, pp. 183–219. (In Russ.)
• Suleymanov R.B., Masanov E.A., & Argynbaev H.A. 1967, “The culture and everyday life of the Kazakh collective farm aul”. Nauka, Alma-Ata, 303 p. (In Russ.)
• Polidovich, Y.B. 2005, “On some semiotic aspects of vessels functionality in the funerary rites of pre-Scythian times”, Strukturno-semioticheskiye issledovaniya v arkheologii (“Structural and semiotic studies in archaeology”), vol. 2. Donetsk, pp. 197–218. (In Russ.)
• Poshyvaylo, O. 1993, “Ethnography of the Ukrainian pottery (Left-bank Ukraine)”. Molod, Kyiv, 408 p. (In Russ.)
• Sveshnikova, T.N., Tsivyan, T.V. 1997, “On the function of tableware in Eastern Roman folklore”, Iz rabot moskovskogo semioticheskogo kruga (“From the works of Moscow semiotic circle”). Moscow, pp. 344–375. (In Russ.)
• Snitkovskaya, P.A., Usmanova, E.R. 2019, “Funerary rites of the Petrovka culture based on the assemblages from Novoilinovsky II necropolis”, Perm University Herald, no. 1, vol. 44. pp. 73–86. doi: 10.17072/2219-3111-2019-1-73-86 (In Russ.)
• Usmanova, E.R. 2005, “Lisakovsk necropolis. Facts and parallels”. KarGU, Karaganda, Lisakovsk, 232 p. (In Russ.)
• Usmanova, E.R. 2013, “Description of the archaeological objects”, Pamyatniki Lisakovskoy okrugi: arkheologicheskiye syuzhety (“Sites of the Lisakovsk region: archaeological patterns”). Karaganda, Lisakovsk, pp. 20–88. (In Russ.)
• Evans-Pritchard, E. 2003, “History of anthropological thought”. Vostochnaya literature, Moscow, 358 p. (In Russ.)