ISSN: 1814-1692 eISSN: 2782-2842 DOI: 10.31833/UAV

Internal conflict of dual symbolism or the conflict in societypaired horse sacrifices from the necropolises of the intachta and petrovka culture in the Southern Trans-Urals and Kazakhstan

Year: 2021

Pages: 274-297

UDC: 902/904

Number: Volume 21, issue 2

Type: scientific article

BBK: 63.4

DOI: https://doi. org/10.31833/uav/2021.21.2.007

Topic: The bronze age: researchers and research

Authors: Kupriyanova, Elena V.

Summary:

The Sintashta and Petrovka archaeological cultures could be viewed as one of the most famous phenomena of the Bronze Age period in the Eurasian steppe zone and the present day archaeologist are engaged in a series of lively debates over their social structure, origins and interactions with each other. This article contributes new data to the topic, based on the analysis of similarities and differences in the rite of paired horse sacrifices in the Sintashta and Petrovka cultures. It also presents an archaeologically based interpretation of the ancient Indo-European mythological narrative, namely the twin myth. Most of the Sintashta paired horse sacrifices (including those with chariot symbols) accompany collective burials. They contain only some parts of the horse, namely heads and legs. Paired horse sacrifices of the Petrovka culture, by contrast, usually accompany individual burials and contain whole horse carcasses. We suggest that the aforementioned differences reflect key differences in the social systems of two cultures, expressing them in a ritual form. It seems that in the Sintashta society the cult of the horse and charioting were linked to a group of people, while in the Petrovka society these phenomena were associated with the particular individuals. Notably, only about a half of the discovered horse sacrifices contain chariot symbols such as horse harness remains, traces of chariot wheels, ranged weapons, etc. Others contain symbols of fertility. Thus, the paired horse burials in the two analyzed cultures not only differ not only in the character of their organization, but also in their symbolic meaning – war/death versus fertility/life. This symbolic antagonism is referenced to the Indo-European variant of the myth about the Divine Twins, which are closely related to the topic of charioting/horse riding and embody the following antitheses: the cults of war and fertility, the warrior’s horse and the farmer’s horse, producing and destructive functions of society.

Keywords:

Southern Trans-Urals, Bronze Age, Sintashta culture, Petrovka culture, funerary rite, paired horse sacrifices

References:

  • Abramyan, L.A. “The world of men and the world of women: divergences and synergies”, Etnicheskie stereotipy muzhskogo i zhenskogo povedeniya (“Ethnic stereotypes of male and female behavior”). St. Petersburg, 1991, pp. 109–131. (In Russ.)
  • Berseneva, N.A. “Family” (?) burials of the Sintashta culture (the Bronze Age in the Southern Urals)”, Kazahskoe hanstvo v potoke istorii: Sbornik  nauchnyh statej, posvyashchennyj 550-letiyu obrazovaniya Kazahskogo hanstva (“The Kazakh Khanate in the flow of history: Collection of scientific papers dedicated to the 550th anniversary of the formation of the Kazakh Khanate”). Almaty, 2015, pp. 335–341. (In Russ.)
  • Botalov, S.G., Grigoriev, S.A., & Zdanovich, G.B. “Burials of the Bronze Age of Bolshekaragansky necropolis (results of the archaeological excavations in 1988)”, Materialy po arheologii i etnografii Yuzhnogo Urala (“Materials on the archeology and ethnography of the Southern Urals”). Chelyabinsk, 1996, pp. 64–88. (In Russ.)
  • Bochkarev, V.S., Kuznetsov, P.F. The main stages of the development of shield cheek-pieces of Northern Eurasia, Process kul'turogeneza nachal'noj pory pozdnego bronzovogo veka Volgo-Ural'skogo regiona (voprosy hronologii, periodizacii, istoriografii). Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii 12–14 maya 2014 g. (“The process of cultural genesis of the first stage of the Late Bronze Age in the Volga-Ural region (questions of chronology, periodization, historiography. Proceedings of the international scientific conference May 12–14, 2014”). Samara, 2014, pp. 5–10. (In Russ.)
  • Vasiliev, I.B. 2015, “Necropolis of the Yamnaya-Poltavka times near the village of Utevka in the Middle Volga region”, Voprosy arheologii Povolzh'ya, iss. 5, pp. 4–46. (In Russ.)
  • Vinogradov, N.B. 2003, The Bronze Age necropolis Krivoe Ozero in the Southern Trans-Urals region. Yuzhno-Ural'skoe kn. izd-vo, Chelyabinsk, 362 p. (In Russ.)
  • Gening, V.F., Zdanovich, G.B., & Gening, V.V. 1992, Sintashta: Archaeological sites of the Aryan tribes of the Ural-Kazakhstan steppes. Part 1. Yuzhno-Ural'skoe kn. izd-vo, Chelyabinsk, 408 p.
  • Dudko, D.M. 2002, “Paired gods-riders among the Slavs and the Iranian influence”, Vostok, no. 5, pp. 5–16. (In Russ.)
  • Dumezil, J. 1989, The supreme gods of the Indo-Europeans. Nauka, Moscow, 234 p. (In Russ.)
  • Epimakhov, A.V. “Barrow cemetery Solntse II – a necropolis of the fortified Medieval settlement Ust’ye”, Materialy po arheologii i etnografii Yuzhnogo Urala (“Materials on the archeology and ethnography of the Southern Urals”). Chelyabinsk, 1996, pp. 22–42. (In Russ.)
  • Epimakhov, A.V. 2004, “On the question of the "degradation" of the chariot complex in the Late Bronze Age in the Southern Trans-Urals (based on the assemblages from Nikolaevka II necropolis)”, Vestnik CGPU, iss.2, pp. 105–111. (In Russ.)
  • Epimakhov, A.V. 2005, Early complex societies in the Northern part of Central Eurasia (based on the assemblages from Kamenny Ambar-5 necropolis). Vol. 1.” Chelyabinskij dom pechati, Chelyabinsk, 192 p. (In Russ.)
  • Epimakhov, A.V., Kupriyanova, E.V., & Hommel, P., Hanks, B. K. “From the ideas about cultural evolution to the mosaic of cultural traditions (the Bronze Age Urals in the light of a large series of radiocarbon dates)”, Materialy I Mezhdunarodnoj mezhdisciplinarnoj konferencii «Drevnie i tradicionnye kul'tury vo vzaimodejstvii so sredoj obitaniya: problemy istoricheskoj rekonstrukcii» (“Proceedings of the 1st International Interdisciplinary Conference "Ancient and traditional cultures and their interactions with the environment: problems of historical reconstruction". Chelyabinsk, 2021, pp. 7–29. (In Russ.)
  • Epimakhov, A.V., Novikov, I.K. 2017, “The problem of interpretation of the chariot symbolism of the Bronze Age in the forest-steppe Trans-Urals (based on the assemblages from Ozernoye-1 necropolis”, Archaeological News, no. 23, pp. 345–354. (In Russ.)
  • Zdanovich, D.G. “Archeology of barrow 25 of Bolshekaragansky necropolis”, Arkaim: nekropol' (po materialam kurgana 25 Bol'shekaraganskogo mogil'nika) (“Arkaim: necropolis (based on the assemblages from barrow 25 of Bolshekaragansky cemetery)”). Chelyabinsk, 2002, pp. 17–106. (In Russ.)
  • Zdanovich D.G., Kupriyanova E.V. “Double horse sacrifices dated to the Bronze Age in Central Eurasia: archeology, mythology and ritual”, Proiskhozhdenie i rasprostranenie kolesnichestva (“The origins and spread of chariots”). Lugansk, 2008, pp. 188–197. (In Russ.)
  • Zdanovich, D.G., Kupriyanova, E.V. “Horses and Twins: to the "archeology of the ritual" of Central Eurasia in the Bronze Age”, Arkaim–Sintashta: drevnee nasledie Yuzhnogo Urala. K 70-letiyu G.B. Zdanovicha: sbornik nauchnyh trudov (“Arkaim-Sintashta: the ancient heritage of the Southern Urals. To the 70th anniversary of G.B. Zdanovich: a collection of scientific papers. Part 1”). Chelyabinsk, 2010, pp. 130–161. (In Russ.)
  • Zolotarev, A.M. 1964, Clan society and the primitive mythology. Nauka, Moscow, 328 p. (In Russ.)
  • Ivanov, V.V. “Twin myths”, Mify narodov mira (“Myths of the peoples of the world. Vol. 1”). Moscow, 1991, pp. 174–176. (In Russ.)
  • Ivanov, V.V. “Odd and even”, Izbrannye trudy po semiotike i istorii kul'tury (“Selected works on semiotics and cultural history”). Moscow, 1999, pp. 381–602. (In Russ.)
  • Ivanov, V.V., Toporov, V.N. “Indo-European mythology”, Mify narodov mira (“Myths of the peoples of the world”). Moscow, 1991. pp. 527–533. (In Russ.)
  • Yettmar, K. 1986, Religions of the Hindu Kush. Nauka, Moscow, 524 p. (In Russ.)
  • Kukushkin, I.A. “Ayapbergen necropolis – a site of the early Andronovo culture in Central Kazakhstan”, Izuchenie pamyatnikov arheologii Pavlodarskogo Priirtysh'ya (“The study of archaeological sites of the Irtysh river region near Pavlodar”). Pavlodar, 2006, pp. 50–69. (In Russ.)
  • Kukushkin, I.A. “Archaeological study of Ashchisu necropolis. Barrow 1”, Istoriko-kul'turnoe nasledie Saryarki (“Historical and cultural heritage of Saryarka”). Karaganda, 2007, pp. 40–64. (In Russ.)
  • Kupriyanova, E.V. 2016, Funerary rites of the Bronze Age in the Southern Trans-Urals: Stepnoye-1 necropolis (excavations 2008, 2010-2011, 2014). Encyclopedia, Chelyabinsk, 119 p. (In Russ.)
  • Kupriyanova, E.V. "Male" and "female" models in the funerary rites of the Bronze Age in the Southern Trans-Urals”, Muzhskoj i zhenskij mir v otrazhenii arheologii. Materialy vseros. s mezhdunar. uchastiem konf. v g. Ufa 19–22 noyabrya 2018 g. (“Male and female world as reflected by archeology. Proceedings of the All-Russian conference with foreign participants, Ufa, November 19–22 2018”). Ufa, 2018, pp. 33–43. (In Russ.)
  • Kupriyanova, E.V., Zdanovich, D.G. 2015, Antiquities of the forest-steppe Trans-Urals: Stepnoye VII necropolis. Encyclopedia, Chelyabinsk, 196 p. (In Russ.)
  • Kupriyanova, E.V., Usachuk, A.N. 2020, “Cheek-pieces from Stepnoye 1 necropolis: practical and semantic aspects of use”, Archeoastronomy and Ancient Technologies, no. 8(1), pp. 69–100. (In Russ.)
  • Levi-Strauss, K. 1999, Primitive mentality. Republic, Moscow, 392 p. (In Russ.)
  • Logvin, A.V. 2019, Sintashta-Petrovka antiquities of the Turgai trough. Dissertation… Candidate of Historical Sciences. Kemerovo, 429 p. (In Russ.)
  • Matveev, A.V. 1998, The first Andronovo tribes in the forests of the Trans-Urals. Nauka, Novosibirsk, 417 p. (In Russ.)
  • Mikhailova, O.V., Kuzmina, O.V. “New sites of the Bronze Age in the Volga river region near Samara”, Ohrana i izuchenie pamyatnikov istorii i kul'tury v Samarskoj oblasti (“Preservation and study of historical and cultural sites in the Samara region”). Samara, 1999, pp. 98–141. (In Russ.)
  • Novozhenov, V.A. 1994, Rock paintings of carts in Central Asia. Argumenty i fakty Kazahstan, Almaty, 297 p. (In Russ.)
  • Potemkina, T.M. 1985, The forest-steppe Tobol river region in the Bronze Age. Nauka, Moscow, 375 p. (In Russ.)
  • Pyslaru, I.A. 2000, “Indo-Europeans, horse and bridle in the Bronze Age”, Stratum plus, no. 2, pp. 322–345. (In Russ.)
  • Rafikova, Y.V. “Double burials of the Alakul culture in the Southern Urals”, Arii stepej Evrazii: epoha bronzy i rannego zheleza v stepyah Evrazii i na sopredel'nyh territoriyah (“Aryan of the steppes of Eurasia: the steppes of Eurasia and the adjacent territories in the Bronze and Early Iron Age”). Barnaul, 2014, pp. 228–243. (In Russ.)
  • Salnikov, K.V. 1952, “Barrows near lake Alakul”, MIA, no. 24, pp. 51–71. (In Russ.)
  • Sotnikova, S.V. 2014, “To the question of the double horse burials in the Bronze Age chariot cultures: reconstruction of the rituals and beliefs (based on the assemblages from the sites of the Sintashta and Petrovka type)”, Problems of history, philology and culture, no. 2(44), pp. 176–189. (In Russ.)
  • Sotnikova, S.V. 2014, “Images of chariots and charioteers in the rituals of the Bronze Age population of Eurasian steppes (reconstruction of rites and beliefs)”, Tomsk State University Journal, no. 380, pp. 102–108. (In Russ.)
  • Sotnikova, S.V. “To the questions of the Sintashta tradition of double horse burials”, Arheologiya Severnoj i Central'noj Azii: novye otkrytiya i rezul'taty mezhdisciplinarnyh issledovanij (“Archaeology of North and Central Asia: recent discoveries and results of the interdisciplinary studies”). Barnaul, 2021, pp. 175–179. (In Russ.)
  • Terenozhkin, A.I., Mozolevsky, B.N. 1988, Melitopol barrow. Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 264 p. (In Russ.)
  • Tkachev, A.A. 2002, Central Kazakhstan in the Bronze Age. Part 1. TumGNGU, Tyumen, 289 p. (In Russ.)
  • Tkachev, A.A. 2019, Maitan – a necropolis of the Bronze Age period. SO RAN, Novosibirsk, 529 p. (In Russ.)
  • Tkachev V.V. 2007, Steppes of the Southern Cis-Urals and Western Kazakhstan at the turn of the Middle and Late Bronze Ages. Aktyubinskij oblastnoj centr istorii, etnografii i arheologii, Aktobe, 384 p. (In Russ.)
  • Terner, V. 1983, Symbol and ritual. Nauka, Moscow, 277 p. (In Russ.)
  • Usachuk, A.N. 2013, The oldest cheek-pieces (production and use). IA NANU, Kiev, Donetsk, 304 p. (In Russ.)
  • Cherlenok, E.A. 2000, “Burials of chariot horses of the Late Bronze Age on the territory of Eastern Europe and Kazakhstan”, Stratum plus, no. 2, pp. 346–349. (In Russ.)
  • Cherlenok, E.A. 2001, “Chariots in the funerary rite (the beginning of the Late Bronze Age in the Eurasian steppes)”, Vestnik molodyh uchenyh. Ser. Istoricheskie nauki, no. 1, pp. 22–29. (In Russ.)
  • Chechushkov I.V. 2011, “Chariots of the Eurasian steppes of the Bronze Age”, Bulletin of Archeology, Anthropology and Ethnography, iss. 2(15), pp. 57–65. (In Russ.)
  • Chechushkov, I.V. 2013, The chariot complex of the Late Bronze Age of steppe and forest-steppe Eurasia (from the Dnieper to the Irtysh). Avtoref. dis. … kand. ist. nauk. Moscow, 26 p. (In Russ.)
  • Chechushkov, I.V., Epimakhov, A.B. “The chariot complex of the Ural-Kazakhstan steppes”, Koni, kolesnicy i kolesnichie stepej Evrazii. Kollektivnaya monografiya (“Horses, chariots and charioteers of the Eurasian steppes. A collective monograph”). Yekaterinburg, 2010, pp. 182–229. (In Russ.)
  • Sternberg, L.Y. 1936, Prehistoric religion in the light of ethnography. Nauka, Leningrad, 571 p. (In Russ.)
  • Day, L.P. 1984, “Dog burials in the Greek world”, American journal archaeology, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 21–32.
  • Kupriyanova, E., Epimakhov, A., & Berseneva, N., Bersenev, A. 2017, “Bronze Age Charioteers of the Eurasian Steppe: A Part-time Occupation for Select Men?”, Praehistorische Zeitschrift, no. 92(1), pp. 40–65.
  • Makkay, J. 1996, “Mycenaean burial sacrifices and the origins of the Proto-Greeks”, Atti e Memorie del Secondo Congresso Internazionale de Micenologia. Roma – Napoli, 1991, pp. 777–784.
  • Narasimhan, V.M., Patterson, N., & Moorjani, P., Rohland, N., Bernardos, R., Mallick, S., Lazaridis,, I., Nakatsuka, N., et al. 2019, “The formation of human population in South and Central Asia”, Science, 365. Eaat7487, pp. 341. doi: 10.1126/science.aat7487.
  • Scott Littleton, C. “Some possible Indo-European themes in the Iliad”, Myth and Law among the Indo-Europeans. Berkley, Los Angeles, London, 1970, pp. 229–246.
  • Vanderpool, E. 1959, “New letter from Greece”, American journal archaeology, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 279–283.
  • Vermeule, E. 1979, Aspects of death in early Greek art and poetry. University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London, 270 p.
  • Ward, D. “The separate function of the Indo-European Divine Twins”, Myth and Law among the Indo-Europeans. Berkley, Los Angeles, London, 1970, pp. 193–202.
  • Wikander, S. 1957. “Nakula et Sahadeva”, Orientalia Suecana, vol. 6, pp. 66–96.
  • Zdanovich, D.G., Gayduchenko, L.L. “Sintashta burial sacrifice: The Bolshekaragansky cemetery in focus”, Complex societies of Central Eurasia from the 3rd to the 1st Millenium BC: Regional specifics in light of global models, vol. I. Washington DC, 2002, pp. 202–231.
Download pdf
up
Search
ISSN: 1814-1692 eISSN: 2782-2842 DOI: 10.31833/UAV