Ufa Archaeological Herald

Archaeology of the Early Iron Age cultures of the Kama region and Cis-Urals is over 150 years old. It is characterized by a rich historiography and a wide range of material artefacts, which need to be studied using modern analytical methods. Those methods were developed by Soviet archaeologists (V. Gening, G. Fedorov-Davydov, V. Kovalevskaya, Y. Sher, I. Kamenetsky, B. Marshak etc.) in the 1960’s and 1970’s and have been actively used by the author of the current paper for many years. In relation to the Early Iron Age cultures such as the Ananyino culture (ACWC), the Kara-Abyz culture and the P’yanyy Bor culture those study methods were repeatedly used for comparative typological analysis of funerary rituals and ceramics. The results obtained and published by the author to date contradict the common idea of genetic continuity between the Ananyino (ACWC), the Kara-Abyz and the P’yanyy Bor cultures and suggest that this idea should be revised.
The current paper summarizes key views of the author and present-day researchers of the Kama region and Cis-Urals on the problem of the origins as well as genetic relationship of the Ananyino, the Kara-Abyz and the P’yanyy Bor cultures. It also contains the results of comparative typological analysis of ceramics and funerary rituals of the Glyadenovo culture.
According to the present research, it could be generally claimed that representatives of the Ananyino culture, who migrated to the Kama region from Northern Cis-Urals, occupied there a rather small territory. Ethnocultural processes in the Southern Cis-Urals occurring in the middle – second half of the First Millennium BC were aused by internal migration of the populations from the Volga-Kama region, which were genetically related to the Akhmylovo and Post-Maklasheevo cultures. Those populations formed the basis of the Kara-Abyz culture in basin of the Belaya river.
The formation of the P’yanyy Bor culture is believed to be determined by the migration of representatives of Pit-Comb Ware culture from the Volga-Vyatka-Vetluga territories around the Kama region and their ethnocultural integration with the late Sarmatians of the Ural-Volga region.

the Ananyino culture, the Kara-Abyz culture, the P’yanyy Bor culture, the Glyadenovo archaeological culture, funerary rituals, ceramics, statistical analysis

• Ashihmina, L.I. 2014, “The genesis of Ananyino culture in the Middle Kama region (on the basis of ceramic material and dwellings)”, Archaeology of the Eurasian Steppes, no. 19, 300 p. (In Russ.)
• Belavin, A.M., Ivanov, V.A., Krylasova, N.B. 2009, The Ugrians of the Cis-Urals in Ancient history and the Middle Ages. Izdatel’skij dom BGPU, Ufa, 285 p. (In Russ.)
• Vorob’eva, S.L. 2014, “Ananyinsky elements of the Kara-Abyz culture (on the basis of clothing items)”, Archeology of the Eurasian Steppes, vol. 20, pp. 314-330. (In Russ.)
• Garustovich, G.N., Mineeva, I.M. 2003, “Notes on the history of archaeological research in Bashkortostan: Vera Vladimirovna Golmsten”, Ufa Archaeological Bulletin, vol. 4, pp. 6-15. (In Russ.)
• Garustovich, G.N., Savelev, N.S. 2004, “A study of the Bronze Age – Early Iron Age monuments located in the Mountain course of the Belaya river (on the issue of the ethnocultural relicts in the South Urals”, Ufa Archaeological Bulletin, vol. 5, pp. 93-118. (In Russ.)
• Gening, V.F. 1973, “A program for statistical processing of ceramic data from archaeological sites, Sovetskaya arheologiya, no. 1, pp. 114-136. (In Russ.)
• Gening, V.F., Goldina, R.D. 1973, “Burial mounds of the Kharinsky type in the Upper Kama region”, Voprosy archeologii Urala, vol. 12, pp. 58-87. (In Russ.)
• Goldina, R.D., Vodolago, N.V. 1990, Burial grounds of the Nevola culture in the Cis-Urals. Izd-vo Un-ta, Irkutsk, 176 p. (In Russ.)
• Zubov, S.E. 2009, “The Pianoborskaya culture”, Istoriya bashkirskogo naroda v 7 tomah, 1, pp. 255-267. (In Russ.)
• Ivanov, V.A. 2010, “A review on the history of studying the Ananyino era monuments located in the basin of the Belaya river”, Ufa Archaeological Bulletin, vol. 10, pp. 12-21. (In Russ.)
• Ivanov, V.A. 2017, “Ceramics of the “Ananyino type” in the Kama region and Cis-Urals”, Izvestiya Komi nauchnogo centra UrO RAN, vol. 1(29), pp. 82-88. (In Russ.)
• Ivanov, V.A. 2017, “Notes on the local variants of the Ananyino culture-historical region (AKHR) (How many Ananyino cultures do we study?)”, Archeology of the Eurasian Steppes, vol. 4, pp. 175-182. (In Russ.)
• Ivanov, V.A. 2019, “Ananyino Corded Ware culture (ACWC) as a component of the Ananyino culture-historical region (AKHR): problems of correlation”, Archeology of the Eurasian Steppes, vol. 4, pp. 317-337. (In Russ.)
• Ivanov, V.A. 2021, “Comparative typological characteristics of the Early Iron Age ceramics in the Kama region and Cis-Urals (on the problem of genetic continuity”, Archeology of the Eurasian Steppes, (in press). (In Russ.)
• Ivanov, V.A., Procenko, A.S. 2017, “Funerary rituals as an indicator of genetic continuity of the Early Iron Age cultures of the Kama region and Cis-Urals”, Archeology of the Eurasian Steppes, vol. 1, pp. 117-129. (In Russ.)
• Ivanov, V.A., Chichko, T.V. 2019, “Statistical and typological analysis of ceramics from the Late Bronze Age settlements located in the Lower course of the Belaya river (returning to the research problem about the genesis of the Early Ananyino Corded Ware culture – ACWC”, Povolzhskaya arheologiya, 1(27), pp. 121-135. (In Russ.)
• Kazanceva, O.A. “Kudashevsky burial ground – the monument of The Migration Period located in the Middle Kama region”, Udmurtskoj arheologicheskoj ekspedicii – 50 let. Materialy Vserossijskoj nauchnoj konferencii, posvyashchennoj 50-letiyu Udmurtskojarheologicheskoj ekspedicii i 80-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya Vladimira Fedorovicha Geninga (“50 years of the Udmurt Archaeological expedition. Materials of the All-Russian scientific conference marking the 50th anniversary of the Udmurt Archaeological expedition and the 80th anniversary Vladimir Fedorovich Gening’s birth”). Izhevsk, 2004, pp. 132-139. (In Russ.)
• Kazanceva, O.A. 2012, “Krasnoyarsk burial ground of the I-V centuries AD located in the basin of the Tulva river in the Middle Kama region”, Materialy i issledovaniya Kamsko-Vyatskoj arheologicheskoj ekspedicii, vol. 24, 180 p. (In Russ.)
• Kuz’minyh, S.V. “Archaeological study of the Ananyino world in the XX century: main outcomes and problems”, Rossijskaya arheologiya: dostizheniya XX i perspektivy XXI vv.: Materialy nauchnoj konferencii «75 let so dnya rozhdeniya V.F. Geninga» (“Russian archeology: breakthroughs of the XX century and the prospects for the XXI century: Materialsof the scientific conference “75 years since the birth of V.F. Gening”). Izhevsk, 2000, pp. 104-113. (In Russ.)
• Kuz’minyh, S.V., Chizhevskij, A.A. 2008, “Ananyino burial ground: main research milestones, collections description and the data on the nature of the monument”, Archeology of the Eurasian Steppes, vol. 8, pp. 6-12. (In Russ.)
• Kuz’minyh, S.V., Chizhevskij, A.A. 2008, “Ananyino world: a review of the current state of the research problem”, Archeology of the Eurasian Steppes, vol. 8, pp. 29-55. (In Russ.)
• Markov, V.N. 2007, “The Lower Kama region in the Ananyino era (Notes on the ethnocultural components of the Ananyino community)”, Archeology of the Eurasian Steppes, vol. 4, 136 p. (In Russ.)
• Ovsyannikov, V.V. 2009, “The Kara-Abyz culture”, Istoriya bashkirskogo naroda v 7 tomah, 1, pp. 223-245 (In Russ.)
• Ovsyannikov, V.V., Yaminov, A.F. 2003, A study of the burial ground near Chertovo Gorodishche in Ufa (1911-1912), Ufa Archaeological Bulletin, vol. 4, pp. 16-57. (In Russ.)
• Pereskokov, M.L. 2018, Perm Cis-Ural region at the end of the Early Iron Age. Izdatel’skij centr «PermUniversityPress », Perm’, 320 p. (In Russ.)
• Savelev, N.S. 2018, “Monuments of the Gamayun and Kurmantau cultures of the south-western limits of the Ural region”, Ufa Archaeological Bulletin, vol. 18, pp. 24-42. (In Russ.)
• Chizhevskij, A.A. 2008, “Funerary monuments of the Volga-Kama region populations in the end of the Bronze - Early Iron Ages: Pre-Ananyino and Ananyino culture historical regions”, Archeology of the Eurasian Steppes, vol. 5, 172 p. (In Russ.)