Ufa Archaeological Herald

There are two main hypotheses about the localization of the Indo-European homeland. The first one connects the spread of the Indo-Europeans with the migrations of the “Kurgan” cultures of the PontoCaspian steppes, especially the Yamnaya culture. Therefore, it is called the “Kurgan” hypothesis. The second hypothesis claims that the Indo-European homeland is localized at the Near East. According to the “Kurgan” hypothesis, the Yamnaya migration at the beginning of the Early Bronze Age led to the formation of the Corded Ware cultures from the Rhine to the Volga regions. This, in turn, caused the generation and spread of modern European dialects. The Chalcolithic period in the steppe zone of Eastern Europe began with the Sredny Stog and Khvalynsk cultures. At this time, up to half of the genes identified in the Chalcolithic populations were Caucasian-Iranian, which indicated migrations from the south. At the same time, small groups of steppe peoples penetrated the Balkans, but these infiltrations were insignificant. New migrations from the Near East at the beginning of the Early Bronze Age are marked by the appearance of Maikop and Anatolian genes. More noticeable were the migrations of the Zhivotilovka-Volchanskoe group to the Carpatho-Danubian region at the end of the 4th millennium BC. Data suggests that there are no reasons to assume that the Codred Ware cultures were formed on the basis of the Yamnaya culture. They were formed partly on the basis of the Neolithic European cultures and partly on the basis of the impulses from the steppe zone in the pre-Yamnaya time.The leading force in the formation process was the Zhivotilovka-Volchanskoe group from the Northern Pontic region. Its penetration into the Balkan-Carpathian area contributed to the establishment of strong connections with the steppe zone of the Pontic region, and subsequent deep contacts, preserved in the Yamnaya period.

Indo-European problem, Yamnaya migration, Corded Ware cultures, Chalcolithic period

• Balanovskii, O.P. 2015, European gene pool. KMK, Moscow, 354 p. (In Russ.)
• Vasiliev, I.B. 1979, “The Middle Volga Region in the Early and Middle Bronze Age”, Drevnyaya istoriya Povolzh’ya (“Ancient History of the Volga Region”), KGPI, Samara, pp. 24–56. (In Russ.)
• Ivanova, S.V. 2021, The history of the population of the North-Western Black Sea region at the end of the 4th – 3rd millennium BC. Buk-Druk, Zhitomir, 424 p. (In Russ.)
• Ivanova, S.V., Nikitin, A.G., Kiosak, D.V. 2018, “Pendulum migrations in the Circumpontic steppe and Central Europe in the era of paleometal and the problem of the Yamnaya culture origins”, Archeology and old history of Ukraine, no. 1(26), pp. 101–146. (In Russ.)
• Klein, L.S. 2017, “Yamnaya, not Yamnaya (review of modern works on barrow burials of the Danube region)”, Stratum plus, no. 2, pp. 361–378. (In Russ.)
• Korenevsky, S.N., Morgunova, N.L. 2022, “To the discussion about the origin and cultural affiliation of the first barrows in the steppes of Eastern Europe and Ciscaucasia”, Science Journal of Volgograd StateUniversity. History. Area Studies. International Relations, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 16–27. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2022.3.2
• Korolev, A.I., Stavitsky, V.V. 2021, “Khvalynsk culture”, Arheologiya Volgo-Ural’ya. T. 2. Eneolit i bronzovyj vek (“Archeology of the Volga-Urals region. Vol. 2. Chalcolithic and Bronze Age”), AN RT, Kazan, pp. 40–60. (In Russ.)
• Kotova, N.S. 2006, Early Chalcolithic of the steppe Dnieper and Sea of Azov. SNU, Lugansk, 328 p. (In Russ.)
• Kotova, N.S. 2013, Dereivka culture and sites of the Nizhnemikhailovsky type. Maidan, Kyiv, Kharkov, 486 p. (In Russ.)
• Litvinenko, R.A. 2006, “An attempt to reveal spatial-semantic structures in the funeral rite of the Babino culture”, Strukturno-semioticheskie issledovaniya v arkheologii (“Structural and semiotic studies in archaeology”), vol. 3, DonNU, Donetsk, pp. 215–236. (In Russ.)
• Manzura, I.V. 2000, “Owning the scepters”, Stratum plus, no. 2, pp. 237–295. (In Russ.)
• Molodin, V.I., Epimakhov, A.V., Marchenko, Zh.V. 2014, “Radiocarbon chronology of the Bronze Age cultures of the Urals and the South of Western Siberia: principles and approaches, achievements and challenges”, Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, no. 13(3), pp. 136–167. (In Russ.)
• Morgunova, N.L. 2014, “On the cultural status and chronology of the Repin culture sites in the TransVolga and Urals regions”, News of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Historical Sciences, no. 16, 3(2), pp. 585–591. (In Russ.)
• Morgunova, N.L. 2021, “The Yamnaya culture between the Volga and the Urals”, Arheologiya VolgoUral’ya. T.  2. Eneolit i bronzovyj vek (“Archeology of the Volga-Urals. Vol. 2. Chalcolithic and Bronze Age”), AN RT, Kazan, pp. 272–295. (In Russ.)
• Mochalov, O.D. 2008, Ceramic assemblages from the Bronze Age burial sites in the forest-steppe of the Volga-Ural interfluve. SGPU, Samara, 252 p. (In Russ.)
• Munchaev, R.M. 1987, Caucasus at the beginning of the Bronze Age. Nauka, Moscow, 416 p. (In Russ.)
• Nedoluzhko, A.V., Bulygina, E.S., Sokolov, A.S., Cygankova, S.V., Gruzdeva, N.M. 2014, “Sequencing of the complete mitochondrial genome of ancient man of the Novosvobodnaya culture, indicates its possible connection with the Funnel Beaker culture”, Acta Naturae, no. 2(21), vol. 6, pp. 34–39. (In Russ.)
• Rezepkin, A.D. 2012, Novosvobodenskaya culture (based on the materials from the “Klady” burial ground). Nestor, Sankt-Peterburg, 344 p. (In Russ.)
• Rezepkin, A.D. 2020, “Maikop – Novosvobodnaya: community, stages, or cultures?”, Trudy VI (XXII) Vserossijskogo arheologicheskogo s”ezda v Samare (“Proceedings of the VI (XXII) All-Russian Archaeological Congress in Samara”), SGSPU, Samara, pp. 328–332. (In Russ.)
• Ryndina, N.V. 2010, “Copper finds of the Khvalynsk 1 cemetery (results of a technological study)”, Khvalynskie eneoliticheskie mogil’niki i khvalynskaya eneoliticheskaya kul’tura. Issledovaniya materialov (“Khvalynsk Chalcolithic cemeteries and the Khvalynsk Chalcolithic culture. Materials research”), Povolzh’e, Samara, pp. 234–256. (In Russ.)
• Salugina, N.P., Morgunova, N.L., Turetsky, M.A. 2016, “Large Bronze Age vessels from the Turganik settlement in the Orenburg oblast”, Samara Journal of Science, no. 4(17), pp. 91–98. (In Russ.)
• Trifonov, V.A. 1996, “The Repin culture and the process of the formation of the Yamnaya cultural and historical community”, Drevnosti volgo-donskih stepej v sisteme evropejskogo bronzovogo veka. Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii (Volgograd, 15–17 apr. 1996 g.) (“Antiquities of the Volga-Don steppes in the system of the European Bronze Age. Proceedings of the international scientific conference.
  (Volgograd, April 15–17, 1996)”), Peremena, Volgograd, pp. 3–5. (In Russ.)
• Khokhlov, A.A. 2021, “Paleoanthropology of the Volga-Urals in the Chalcolithic period”, Arheologiya Volgo-Ural’ya. T. 2. Eneolit i bronzovyj vek (“Archeology of the Volga-Urals. Vol.2. Chalcolithic and Bronze Age”), AN RT, Kazan, pp. 263–269. (In Russ.)
• Khokhlov, A.A., Kitov, E.P. 2021, “Paleoanthropology of the steppe and forest-steppe zone of the Volga-Urals region in the Bronze Age”, Arheologiya Volgo-Ural’ya. T. 2. Eneolit i bronzovyj vek (“Archeology of the Volga-Urals. Vol.2. Chalcolithic and Bronze Age”), AN RT, Kazan, pp. 638–647.(In Russ.)
• Chernykh, E.N. 2010, “Copper from the Khvalynsk cemeteries and its parallels (according to spectral analyses)”, Khvalynskie eneoliticheskie mogil’niki i khvalynskaya eneoliticheskaya kul’tura. Issledovaniya materialov (“Khvalynsk Chalcolithic cemeteries and the Khvalynsk Chalcolithic culture. Materials Research”), Povolzh’e, Samara, pp. 219–233. (In Russ.)
• Allentoft,M. et al. 2015, “Population genomics of Bronze Age Eurasia”, Nature, no. 522, pp. 167–172.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14507
• Allentoft,M.E. et al. 2022, “Population genomics of Stone Age Eurasia”, BioRxiv preprint DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.04.490594
• Anthony, D.W. 2007, The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze Age riders from the Eurasian Steppes shaped the modern world. University press, Princeton, 568 p.
• Anthony, D.W., Khokhlov, A.A., Agapov, S.A., Agapov, D.S., Schulting, R., Olalde, I., Reich, D. 2022, “The Eneolithic cemetery at Khvalynsk on the Volga River”, Praehistorische Zeitschrift, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 22–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pz-2022-2034
• Budziszewski, J., Włodarczak, P. 2011, “Die schnurkeramischen Beile aus den kleinpolnischen Gräbern”, Dechsel, Axt, Beil & Co-Werkzeug, Waffe, Kultgegenstand, Aktuellesaus der Neolithforschung, Beier&Beran, Langenweissbach, pp. 55–64.
• Dani, J. 2011, “Research of Pit–Grave culture kurgans in Hungary in the last three decades”, Kurgan Studies. An environmental and archaeological multiproxy study of burial mounds in the Eurasian steppe zone, BAR, Oxford, pp. 25–69.
• Frînculeasa, A., Preda, B., Heyd, V. 2015, “PitGraves, Yamnaya and Kurgans along the Lower Danube: Disentangling IVth and IIIrd Millennium BC Burial Customs, Equipment and Chronology”, Praehistorische Zeitschrift, no. 90(1–2), pp. 45–113.
• Furholt, M. 2003, Die absolutchronologische Datierung der Schnurkeramik in Mitteleuropa und Südskandinavien. Habelt, Bonn, 283 p.
• Gamkrelidze, T.V., Ivanov, V.V. 1995, IndoEuropean and the Indo-Europeans. De Gruyter. De Gruyter, Berlin-New York, 1274 p.
• Gelabert, P., Schmidt, R.W., Fernandes, D.M., Karsten, J.K., Harper, T.K., Madden, G.D., Ledogar, S.H., Sokhatsky, M., Oota, H., Kennett, D.J., Pinhasi, R. 2022, “Genomes from Verteba cave suggest diversity within the Trypillians in Ukraine”, Scientific Reports, 12:7242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11117-8
• Gerling, C., Banffy, E., Dani, J., Kohler, K., Kulcsar, G., Pike, A.W.G., Szeverenyi, V., Heyd, V. 2012, “Immigration and transhumance in the Early Bronze Age Carpathian Basin: the occupants of a kurgan”, Antiquity, no. 86, pp.1097–1111.
• Gimbutas, M. 1956, The prehistory of Eastern Europe. Mesolithic, neolithic and copper age cultures in Russia and the Baltic area. Peabody Museum, Cambridge, 241 p.
• Grigoriev, S. 2002, Ancient Indo-Europeans. Rifei, Chelyabinsk, 498 p.
• Grigoriev, S. 2021, “Archeology, language and genes: the Indo-European perspective”, Journal of Indo-European studies, no. 1 & 2, pp. 187–230.
• Haak, W. et al. 2015, “Massive migration from the steppe was a source for Indo-European languages in Europe”, Nature, no. 522(7555), pp. 207–211.
• Häusler, A. 2014, “Bemerkungen zu den ostlichen Regionalgruppen der schnurkeramischen Becherkulturen”, Jahresschrift für Mitteldeutsche Vorgeschichte, no. 94, pp. 83–123.
• Heyd, V. 2016, “Das Zeitalter der Ideologien: Migration, Interaktion und Expansion im prähistorischen Europa des 4. und 3. Jahrtausends v. Chr. Transitional landscapes: the 3rd millennium BC in Europe”, Proceedings of the International Workshop “Socio-Environmental Dynamics over the Last 12,000 Years: The Creation of Landscapes III (15th – 18th April 2013)” in Kiel, Bonn, pp. 53–84.
• Heyd, V. 2021, “Yamnaya, Corded Wares, and Bell Beakers on the move”, Yamnaya interactions. Proceedings of the International Workshop held in Helsinki, 25–26 April 2019, Budapest, pp. 383–414.
• Immel, A., Țerna, S., Simalcsik, A., Susat, J., Šarov, O., Sîrbu, G., Hofmann, R., Müller, J., Nebel, A., Krause-Kyora, B. 2020, “Gene-flow from steppe individuals into Cucuteni-Trypillia associated populations indicates longstanding contacts and gradual admixture”, Scientific Reports, 10:4253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61190-0
• Ivanova, S., Kos’ko, O., Włodarczak, P. 2014, “Component of the Corded Ware traditions. Amphorae in burials of Yamnaya culture in the North-west Pontic”, Naddniestrzanskie kompleksy cmentarzysk kurhanowych spolecznosci z III i z pierwszejpolowy II tysiqcleciaprzed Chr. w okolicach Jampola, obwod winnicki. Z badan nadpolnocno-zachodniq rubiezq osadnictwa spolecznosci krggu kultur „wczesnobrqzowych” strefypontyjskiej, Nauka i innowacje, Poznan, pp. 351–386.
• Juras, A., Chyleński, M., Ehler, E., Malmström, H., Żurkiewicz, D., Włodarczak, P., Wilk, S., Peška, J., Fojtík, P., Králík, M., Libera, J., Bagińska, J., Tunia, K., Klochko, V.I., Dabert, M., Jakobsson, M., Kośko, A. 2018, “Mitochondrial genomes reveal an east to west cline of steppe ancestry in Corded Ware populations”, Nature. Scientific Reports, 8:11603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29914-5
• Kaiser, E. 2016, “Migrationen von Ost nach West. Die Archäologie von Wanderungsbewegungen im 3. Jahrtausend v. Chr.”, Mitteilungen der Berliner Gesellschaft für Anthropologie, Ethnologie und Urgeschichte, no. 37, pp. 31–44.
• Kotova, N.S. 2016, “The contacts of the Eastern European steppe people with the Balkan population during the transition period from Neolithic to Eneolithic”, Der Schwarzmeerraum vom Neolithikum bis in die Früheisenzeit (6000–600 v. Chr.). Kulturelle Interferenzen in der zirkumpontischen Zone und Kontakte mit ihren Nachbargebieten, Leidorf, Rahden/Westf, pp. 311–321.
• Linderholm, A., Kılınç, G.M., Szczepanek, A., Włodarczak, P., Jarosz, P., Belka, Z., Dopieralska, J.,Werens, K., Górski, J., Mazurek, M., Hozer, M., Rybicka, M., Ostrowski, M., Bagińska, J., Koman, W., Rodríguez-Varela, R., Storå, J., Götherström, A., Krzewińska, M. 2020, “Corded Ware cultural complexity uncovered using genomic and isotopic analysis from southeastern Poland”, Nature. Scientific Reports, 10:6885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63138-w
• Manzura, I.V. 2016, “North Pontic steppes at the end of the 4th millennium BC: the epoch of broken borders”, Man, Culture and Society from the Copper Age until the Early Iron Age in Northern Eurasia, Tyragetia International, Chisinău, pp. 149–171.
• Mathieson, I. et al. 2015, “Genome-wide patterns of selection in 230 ancient Eurasians”, Nature, no. 528, pp. 499–503.
• Mathieson, I. et al. 2018, “The genomic history of southeastern Europe”, Nature, no. 555(7695), pp. 197–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25778
• Müller, J. 2001, Soziochronologische Studien zum Spätneolithikum im Mittelelbe-Saale-Gebiet (4100 – 2700 v. Chr.). Leidorf, Rahden, 620 p.
• Nordqvist, K., Heyd, V. 2020, “The forgotten child of the wider Corded Ware family: Russian Fatyanovo Culture in context”, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, no. 86, pp. 65–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ppr.2020.9
• Papac, L. et al. 2021, “Dynamic changes in genomic and social structures in third millennium BCE central Europe”, Science Advances, no. 7, eabi6941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abi6941
• Poulmarc’h, M., Le Mort, F. 2016, “Diversification of the funerary practices in the Southern Caucasus from the Neolithic to the Chalcolithic”, Quaternary International, no. 395, pp. 184–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.04.040
• Rassamakin, Y. 1994, “The main directions of the development of early pastoral societies of Northern Pontic zone: 4500–2450 B.C. (Pre-Yamnaya cultures and Yamnaya culture)”, Baltic-Pontic Studies, vol. 2, pp. 29–70.
• Rassamakin, Y. 2012, “Eneolithic Burial Mounds in the Black Sea Steppe: from the First Burial Symbols to Monumental Ritual Architecture”, Ancestral Landscape. Burial mounds in the Copper and Bronze Ages (Central and Eastern Europe – Balkans – Adriatic – Aegean, 4th–2nd millennium B.C.). Proceedings of the International Conference held in Udine, May 15th–18th 2008, Maison de l’Orient et de la Méditerranée Jean Pouilloux, Lyon, pp. 293–305.
• Scorrano, G., Yediay, F.E., Pinotti, T., Feizabadifarahani,M., Kristiansen,K. 2021, “The genetic and cultural impact of the Steppe migration into Europe”, Annals of Human Biology, no. 48/3, pp. 223–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03014460.2021.1942984
• Tassi, F. et al. 2017, “Genome diversity in the Neolithic Globular Amphorae culture and the spread of Indo-European languages”, Proceedings of the Royal Society B, no. 284:20171540. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1540
• Wang,Chuan-Chao et al. 2019, “Ancient human genome-wide data from a 3000-year interval in the Caucasus corresponds with eco-geographic regions”, Nature communications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-08220-8
• Włodarczak, P. 2001, “The Absolute Chronology of the Poland”, Die absolute Chronologie in Mitteleuropa 3000–2000 v. Chr, Leidorf, Poznań–Bamberg–Rahden, pp. 103–129.
• Włodarczak, P. 2006, Kultura ceramiki sznurowej na Wyżynie Małopolskiej. Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology, Krakow, 346 p.
• Włodarczak, P. 2010, “Dunajski szlak kultury grobów jamowych a problem genezy kultury ceramiki sznurowej”, Mente et rutro. Studia archeologica Johanni Machnik viro doctissimo octogesimo vitae anno ab amicis, collegis et discipulis oblate, Archaeologica Ressoviensis, Rzeszów, pp. 299–325.
• Włodarczak, P. 2012, “Die Gliederung der Schnurkeramik im Zürcher Raum und in Mitteleuropa – Probleme der Synchronisation”, Antiqua, vol. 50, pp. 127–138.
• Włodarczak, P. 2017, “Battle-axes and beakers. The Final Eneolithic societies”, The past societies. 5500 – 2000 bc. Polish lands from the first evidence of human presence to the early Middle Ages, Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology, Warszawa, pp. 275–336.
• Włodarczak, P. 2021a, “Eneolithic and Early Bronze Age barrows in Vojvodina”, Danubian route of the Yamnaya culture. The barrows of Vojvodina, Archaeolingua, Budapest, pp. 215–256.
• Włodarczak, P. 2021b, “Eastern impulses in cultural and demographic change during the end of the south-eastern Polish Eneolithic”, Yamnaya interactions. Proceedings of the International Workshop held in Helsinki, 25–26 April 2019, Archaeolingua, Budapest, pp. 435–462.